Development of Management Quality Assessment Methodology in the Public Sector: Problems and Contradictions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2015-3-4Keywords:
public sector, organization of social processes, the characteristics of management quality, algorithmization, contradictions of management quality assessment, management quality assessment in the public sectorAbstract
The development management quality assessment methodology in the public sector is relevant scientific and practical problem of economic research. The utilization of the results of the assessment on the basis of the authors' methodology allows us to rate the public sector organizations, to justify decisions on the reorganization and privatization, and to monitor changes in the level of the management quality of the public sector organizations. The study determined the place of the quality of the control processes of the public sector organization in the system of “Quality of public administration - the effective operation of the public sector organization,'' the contradictions associated with the assessment of management quality are revealed, the conditions for effective functioning of the public sector organizations are proved, a mechanism of comprehensive assessment and algorithm for constructing and evaluating the control models of management quality are developed, the criteria for assessing the management quality in the public sector organizations, including economic, budgetary, social and public, informational, innovation and institutional criteria are empirically grounded. By utilizing the proposed algorithm, the assessment model of quality management in the public sector organizations, including the financial, economic, social, innovation, informational and institutional indicators is developed. For each indicator of quality management, the coefficients of importance in the management quality assessment model, as well as comprehensive and partial evaluation indicators are determined on the basis of the expert evaluations. The main conclusion of the article is that management quality assessment for the public sector organizations should be based not only on the indicators achieved in the dynamics and utilized for analyzing the effectiveness of management, but also should take into account the reference levels for the values of these parameters. The comparison of the indicators will allow to assess not only the degree of the achievement of objectives and results but also the quality of conformance of the chosen development strategy from a position of management quality.References
Galbraith, J. K. (1973). Economics and the Public Purpose. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 334.
Stiglitz, J. E. (1995). Economics of the Public Sector. NY, London, 1995.
Friedman, M. (2002). Capitalism and Freedom. The University of Chicago Press Chicago.
Eskaus, R. S. (1972). Basis Economycs. Boston. USA, 18.
Kamenskiy, A. A. (2005). Effektivnost gosudarstvennogo sektora v rynochnoy ekonomike [Efficiency of public sector in the market economy]. St. Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University of Economics and Finance Publ., 5.
Wollmann, H. (2003). Evaluation in Public-sector reform: Toward a ‘third wave’ of evaluation? In: Hellmut Wollmann (Ed.). Evaluation in Public Sector Reform, Cheltenham. Northampton: Edward Elgar, 1-11.
Pollitt, C. & Bouckaert, G. (2003). Evaluating public management reforms: An international perspective. Evaluation in Public-Sector Reform. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 12-35.
Artemov, A. V., Brykin, A. V. & Shumaev, V. A. (2007). Upravlenie ekonomikoy na osnove gosudarstvennogo sektora [Management of economy on the basis of public sector]. Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom [Management in Russia and Abroad], 6, 89-103.
Pogosov, I. A. (2009). Tselevyye ustanovki i institutsionalnyye edinitsy obshchestvennogo sektora ekonomiki [Purposes and institutional units of public sector of economy]. Voprosy statistiki [Questions of statistics], 5, 32-41.
Karpov, D. Yu. (2010). Rol gosudarstvennogo sektora na sovremennom etape razvitiya rossiyskoy ekonomiki [Role of public sector at the present stage of the Russian economy development]. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Samara State Economic University], 8, 33-36.
Repich, O. B. (2009). Razvitie konkurentnykh nachal v gosudarstvennom sektore regionalnoy ekonomiki: metodicheskie podkhody k otsenke [Development of the competitive beginnings in the public sector of regional economy: methodical approaches to an assessment]. Ekonomicheskie nauki [Economic sciences], 10, 187-191.
Prosvirina, M. E. (2004). Razrabotka metodov kompleksnoy otsenki sistemy menedzhmenta kachestva predpriyatiya: dis. ... kand. ekon. nauk [Method development of quality management system complex assessment for the enterprise: PhD thesis in Economics]. Moscow, 221.
Gukasyan, Z. O. (2008). Formirovanie sistemy otsenki kachestva upravleniya na predpriyatii na printsipakh ravnovesiya ekonomicheskikh interesov: dis. ... kand. ekon. nauk [System development of management quality evaluation at the enterprise according to the principles of balance of economic interests: PhD thesis in Economics]. Moscow, 200.
Hans de Bruijn (2005). Upravlenie po rezultatam v gosudarstvennom sektore [Managing Performance in the Public Sector]. Trans. from English by I. Popesko, O. Sinitsynoy. Moscow: Economic Research Institute Publ. (Biblioteka IKSI [Library of Economic Research Institut]).
Yakobson, L. I. (1996). Ekonomika obshchestvennogo sektora: osnovy teorii gosudarstvennykh finansov: uchebnik dlya vuzov po napravleniyu «Ekonomika» [The public sector economy: bases of the theory of public finances: the textbook for higher education institutions in the direction of Economy]. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 556.
Osborne, D. & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government. Massachusetts, 146.
Kozhevina, O. & Sirotenko, M. (2014). Formation of metodological based of the Balanced Scorecard in strategic management development Pablic Sector mesoscale. Institution framework of the economy functioning in conditions of transformation, 2. Verlag SWG imex GmbH, Nurnberg, Deutschland, 31-34.
Kozhevina, O. V., Balunova, N. V. & Yurchenko, E. V. (2015). Razrabotka metodologicheskogo podkhoda k otsenke kachestva upravleniya v gosudarstvennom sektore ekonomiki [Development of methodological approach to the management quality assessment in the public sector of economy]. Finansovyy menedzhment [Financial management], 1, 23-26.
Nagimova, A. M. (2009). Effektivnost deyatelnosti gosudarstvennykh organov upravleniya kak faktor povysheniya kachestva zhizni v regione: problemy otsenki i izmereniya [The government efficiency as a factor of improvement of quality of life in the region: problems of assessment and measurement]. TsPEI AN RT [Center of Advanced Economic Research of Academy of Sciences of Republic of Tatarstan]; In: M.R. Safiullin (Ed.). Kazan: Kazan State University Publ.
Burkov, V. N. et al. (2011). Mekhanizmy upravleniya. Multifunktsionalnoye uchebnoye posobie [The management mechanisms. Multifunctional manual]. In: D. A. Novikov, Academician of RAS (Ed.). Moscow: URSS (Editorial URSS) Publ., 216. (Umnoe upravlenie [Celver management]).
Ishchenko, M. M. & Krylov, M. G. (2007). Teoreticheskie osnovy formirovaniya mekhanizma otsenki effektivnosti sistemy upravleniya predpriyatiem [Theoretical essentials of development of the assessment mechanism of system effectiveness of business management]. Audit i finansovyy analiz [Audit and financial analysis], 4, 350-354.
Kurnikova, A. V. (2012). Sushchnost mekhanizma upravleniya innovatsionnym razvitiem regiona [Essence of the region innovative development management mechanism]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University], 3 (257), 7, 9-13 (Upravlenie [Management]).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Olga Vladimirovna Kozhevina, Evgeniya Vitalyevna Yurchenko, Nataliya Vladimirovna Balunova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
