Substantiation of Resource Territories Development: Complex "Meso-Level" Problem
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2015-4-21Keywords:
region, mineral resource complex, infrastructure, cluster, impact investing, inclusive economic development, public-private partnership, financial and economic evaluation, real options analysis, fuzzy cognitive modelAbstract
The paper presents an approach to the analysis and evaluation of integrated investment projects, which consist of infrastructure facilities and industrial clusters, allocated in poorly developed areas rich with natural resources. It shows the feasibility of a public-private partnership during the construction of infrastructure facilities in order to minimize the risks and maximize the benefits. The conceptual framework of developed approach is associated with the ideas and principles of the «impact investing» («creating shared values») and inclusive economic development. These are increasingly used in the world, especially to accelerate the socio-economic development of the backward countries and territories. The article describes an international experience and justifies the relevance of the application of these concepts to the Russian context. We revealed methodical problems associated with the applying of traditional methods to evaluate economic effects of the project investment in conditions of high uncertainty. It is necessary to use models and methods (real options analysis, fuzzy cognitive models), which allow directly to take into account uncertainty and project risks. The novelty of the article consists in methodical tools for evaluating the socio-economic efficiency of the complex projects for infrastructure development and resources development. The elaborated approach has been applied for substantiation of the road construction project in the Berezovsky district of Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug. It is shown that there are opportunities to generate a complex of institutional, organizational and financial conditions, under which the implementation of the project will be attractive for investors and for the state and will bring socio-economic benefits to the territory. The proposed approach and tools can be used in the socio-economic strategic planning under the justification of infrastructure projects in the new development areas of resource rich regions.References
Kryukov, V. A., Sevastyanova, A. E., Shmat, V. V. (2006). Problemy vybora napravleniy diversifikatsii ekonomiki neftegazovoy territorii [Choice of the directions of economic diversification for the oil and gas territory]. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika [Spatial economy], 2, 33–44.
Tatarkin, A. I. & Romanova, O. A. (2014). Promyshlennaya politika: genezis, regionalnyye osobennosti i zakonodatelnoye obespechenie [Industrial policy: genesis, regional features and legislative support]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 2, 9–20.
Kryukov, V. A., Silkin, V. Yu., Tokarev, A. N. & Shmat, V. V. (2011). Mineralno-syryevoy kompleks Rossii. Realizatsiya preimushchestv i vozmozhnostey razvitiya [Mineral and raw complex of Russia. Realization of advantages and opportunities for development]. Mineralnyye resursy Rossii. Ekonomika i upravlenie [Mineral resources of Russia. Series: economics and management], 5, 3–13.
Varnavskiy, V. G. (2005). Partnerstvo gosudarstva i chastnogo sektora. Formy, proekty, riski [Partnership of the state and private sector. Forms, projects, risks]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 315.
Matveev, D. B. (2007). Gosudarstvenno-chastnoye partnerstvo. Zarubezhnyy i rossiyskiy opyt [Public-private partnership. Foreign and Russian experience]. St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ., 171.
Zinchenko, V. P. (2007). Tolerantnost k neopredelennosti. Novost ili psikhologicheskaya traditsiya? [Tolerance to uncertainty. News or psychological tradition?]. Voprosy psikhologii [Psychology questions], 6, 3–20.
Hoekman, B. (2012). Trade Policy for Inclusive Growth. Policy Dialogue. Redefining the Role of the Government in Tomorrow’s International Trade. Geneva: UNCTAD, Retrieved from: http://unctad.org/meetings/en/SessionalDocuments/ditc_dir_2012d1a_Hoekman.pdf (date of access: 11.05.2015).
Porter, M. & Kramer, M. (2011). Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review, 1. Reprint R1101C, 17. Retrieved from: http://www.hks.harvard.edu/m-rcbg/fellows/N_Lovegrove_Study_Group/Session_1/Michael_Porter_Creating_Shared_Value.pdf (date of access: 11.05.2015).
Impact Investing Policy in 2014. A Snapshot of Global Activity. (2014). IIPC, 100. Retrieved from: http://globalpolicy.iipcollaborative.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2014/12/2014-IIPC_Full-v6.pdf (date of access: 11.05.2015).
Höchstädter, A. K. & Scheck, B. (2014). Mapping the Social Impact Investing Market in Germany. An Overview of Opportunities in the Education Space. IIPC, 52. Retrieved from: http://gle.iipcollaborative.org/mapping-social-impact-investing-market-germany-overview-opportunities-education-space/ (date of access: 30.06.2015).
Harji, K., Reynolds, J., Best, H. & Jeyaloganathan, M. (2014). Impact Investing in Canada. RBC Foundation, 17. Retrieved from: http://www.rbc.com/community-sustainability/_assets-custom/pdf/2014-Impact-Investing-in-Canada.pdf (date of access: 30.06.2015).
Ngoasong, M., Korda, A. & Paton, R. (2014). Impact Investing and Inclusive Business Development in Africa. A research agenda. IKD Working Paper, 2014. UK: Open University Business School, 23. Retrieved from: http://www.open.ac.uk/ikd/documents/working-papers/ikd-working-paper-76.pdf (date of access: 30.06.2015).
The Roles and Opportunities for the Private Sector in Africa’s Agro-Food Industry. (2012). UNDP African Facility for Inclusive Markets. UN: United Nations Development Program, 100. Retrieved from: http://www.undp.org/.content/dam/undp/library/corporate/Partnerships/Private%20Sector/Market%20Study.pdf (date of access: 30.06.2015).
Laughton, D. G. (1998). The Potential for Use of Modern Asset Pricing Methods for Upstream Petroleum Project Evaluation. Introductory Remarks. The Energy Journal, 19(1), 1–11.
Shmat, V. V. (2015). O metodakh ekonomicheskoy otsenki regionalnykh energeticheskikh proektov GChP s uchetom faktorov neopredelennosti i riska [On the methods of economic assessment of the regional PPP energy projects taking into account factors of uncertainty and risk]. Energeticheskaya politika [The energy policy], 3, 47–58.
Gamba, A. & Sick, G. (2010). Some important issues involving real options. An overview. Multinational Finance Journal, 14(1/2), 73–123.
Kosko, B. (1986). Fuzzy cognitive maps. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 24, 65–75. Retrieved from: http://sipi.usc.edu/~kosko/FCM.pdf (date of access: 30.06.2015).
Silov, V. B. (1995). Prinyatie strategicheskikh resheniy v nechetkoy obstanovke [Adoption of strategic decisions in the indistinct situation]. Moscow: INPRO — RES Publ., 228.
Belan, A. K. & Shmat, V. V. (2015). Analiz vliyaniya resursnykh i neresursnykh faktorov na rost ekonomiki Tomskoy oblasti s primeneniem kognitivnogo podkhoda [The analysis of influence of resource and non-resource factors on economic growth of the Tomsk region with application of cognitive approach]. Vestnik NGU [Messenger of NSU], 15(1), 78–93. (Series: Social and economic sciences).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Valeriy Anatolievich Kryukov, Anastasiya Yegorovna Sevastyanova, Anatoliy Nikolaevich Tokarev, Vladimir Vitalyevich Shmat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
