The Main Directions to Overcome the Challenges of the 21st Century in Agriculture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2016-1-8Keywords:
unbalanced diet, preservation of the natural balance, genetic potential of productivity, expansion of range of crops, expansion of animal species, output of nutrients, economic and mathematical modeling, commodity structure of production, principle of multiculturalism, vertical integration, import substitution, small forms of productionAbstract
In the article, on the basis of the world and national approaches to the solution of the food problem, the main vectors of the agricultural development aimed at overcoming the challenges of the XXI century and eventually attain the food independence of Russia are proved. The reasons for the decline per capita food production in the world are revealed; the increasing influence, in addition to the population growth, of the equalization of level and quality of food on its dynamics is noted. The dominant current public incentives form the growth rate of demand in advance the production. It is proposed to correct the strategy of agrarian development, while maintaining the principles of multiculturalism in the economy, focusing on the leading role of the large, vertically integrated business entities, and on the import substitution of the basic foodstuffs through the involvement of regional internal resources, including the development of cooperation principles, historically attended the emergence of commodity-money relations in the village. The growth of productivity of production factors is grounded as the main vector that may rectify the situation. It is recommended to diversify a set of cultivated plants and breeds of animals, as well as to develop a new commodity structure of production. 7he need for food imports is stressed in view of the fact that for the imported products, which are manufactured using primarily the renewable resources, Russia has to pay the price of the potential non-renewable natural resources, making it strategically disadvantageous. In order to achieve the sustainability of the basic parameters and enhance the results of the agricultural activity, it is recommended to use the tools of economic and mathematical modeling of the distribution of economic resources. The findings will be reflected in the justification of the strategy for the regional agricultural development.References
Figurovskaya, N. E. (2010). Ekonomicheskaya strategiya agrarnogo razvitiya [Economic strategy of agrarian developmen]. Ekonomist [Economist], 8, 82–86.
Emelyanov, A. (2003). Vzaimodeystvie form khozyaystv v agrarnoy ekonomike [Interaction of economic forms in agrarian economy]. Voprosy ekonomiki [Questions of economy], 11, 120–132.
Amosov, A. (2008). O strategii razvitiya agrarnoy sfery [On the development strategy of the agrarian sphere]. Ekonomist [Economist], 9, 48–53.
Surovtsev, V. & Nikulina, Yu. (2010). Innovatsionnoye razvitie kak faktor prodovolstvennoy bezopasnosti [Innovative development as a factor of food security]. Ekonomist [Economist], 6, 79–84.
Taran, V. (1998). Sravnitelnyy analiz energeticheskoy effektivnosti selskokhozyaystvennogo proizvodstva Rossii i promyshlenno razvitykh stran [Comparative analysis of the power efficiency of Russian agricultural production and industrialized countries]. Mezhdunarodnyy selskokhozyaystvennyy zhurnal [International agricultural journal], 1, 67–71.
Mindrin, A. (1996). Energeticheskie ekvivalenty proizvodstva prodovolstviya [Power equivalents of food production]. Mezhdunarodnyy selskokhozyaystvennyy zhurnal [International agricultural journal], 2, 42–45.
Kovalev, E. V. (2005). Ekonomika, ekonomicheskaya teoriya. Novyye aspekty mirovoy prodovolstvennoy problemy [Economics, economic theory. New aspects of a world food problem]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya [Economics, economic theory. New aspects of a world food problem], 3, 3–7.
Selskoye khozyaystvo, okhota i lesovodstvo v Respublike Bashkortostan: stat. sb. [Agriculture, hunting and forestry in the Republic of Bashkortostan: collection of articles]. (2013). Ufa: Bashkortostanstat, 190.
Braun, L. (2010). Kak izbezhat klimaticheskikh katastrof? Plan B. 4.0. Spasenie tsivilizatsii: per. s angl. [How to avoid the climatic disasters? B 4.0. plan Saving the civilization: trans. from English]. Moscow: Eksmo Publ., 416.
Takumbetov, M. I., Gubaydullin, M. S. et al. (1980). Metodika razmeshcheniya plana gosudarstvennykh zakupok selskokhozyaystvennykh produktov po rayonam i khozyaystvam BASSR na KhI pyatiletku [Method of allocation of a plan of the state procurements of agricultural products for areas and farms of Bashkir Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic on the XI five-years period]. Ufa: Bashizdat Publ., 25.
Garipov, F. N., Baymuratova, Kh. G. & Pechatkin, V. V. (2001). Energeticheskaya effektivnost agrarnogo sektora ekonomiki [Power efficiency of agrarian sector of economy]. Ufa: Gilem Publ., 95.
Panitchpakdi, S. (2009). The Global Economic Crisis: System Failures and Multilateral Remedies. N.Y.: UN, 80.
Ivanov, V. A. & Terentyev, V. V. (2009). Regionalnyye aspekty prodovolstvennoy bezopasnosti [Regional aspects of food security]. Ekonomicheskie i sotsialnyye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz [Economic and social changes: facts, tendencies, forecast], 3(7), 45–54.
Vaynberg, E. (2013). Prostranstvo, rasselenie i modernizatsiya ekonomiki Rossii [Space, resettlement and modernization of the economy of Russia]. Federalizm [Federalism], 1, 25–38.
Ivanovsky, S. (2010). Problemy razvitiya selskogo khozyaystva sovremennoy Rossii [Development problems of the agriculture of modern Russia]. Voprosy ekonomiki [Questions of economy], 1, 57–72.
Treysi, M. (1995). Selskoye khozyaystvo i prodovolstvie v ekonomike razvitykh stran: Vvedenie v teoriyu, praktiku i politiku: per. s angl. [Agriculture and foodstuffs in economy of the developed countries: Introduction into the theory, practice and policy: trans. from English]. Ekonomicheskaya shkola [Economic school]. St. Petersburg: Ekonomicheskaya shkola Publ., 431.
Gizatullin, Kh. N. & Garipov, F. N. (2014). Sintez modeley V. Leontyeva i L. Kantorovicha dlya upravleniya strukturnymi preobrazovaniyami v ekonomike [Synthesis of the V. Leontyev and L. Kantorovich models for management of structural transformations in economy]. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii [Journal of economic theory], 2, 21–28.
Robbins, L. (2013). Istoriya ekonomicheskoy mysli. Lektsii v Londonskoy shkole ekonomiki: per. s angl. [History of economic thought. Lectures in the London School of Economics: trans. from English]. Moscow: Gaydar Institute Publ., 496.
Bellman, R. & Dreyfus, S. (1965). Prikladnyye zadachi dinamicheskogo programmirovaniya: per. s angl. [Applied problems of dynamic programming: trans. from English]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 460.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Fanus Nagimovich Garipov, KhamidNurislamovich Gizatullin, Zukhra Fanusovna Garipova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
