The Role of Russia and China in Shaping the Integration Contours of the Greater Eurasian Partnership
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2025-3-4Keywords:
Greater Eurasian Partnership, integration contour, civilizational partnership, levels of partnership, partnership spheres, partnership directions, prospective cooperation space, transformation of global economic relationsAbstract
In light of Russia’s goal to strengthen economic ties with EAEU members and key partners, an essential research task is to examine how the resources of Greater Eurasian Partnership (GEP) participants complement each other, as resource complementarity directly shapes the partnership’s integration patterns. This study aims to substantiate the key contours of GEP integration and assess the respective contributions of Russia and China to its development. The underlying hypothesis is that their cooperation acts as a driving force behind the GEP. The GEP is conceptualized as a distinctive form of “civilizational partnership,” which enhances the roles of Russia and China in the Eurasian space. Using methods of economic-geographical, statistical, historical, and logical analysis, the study systematizes EAEU agreements with external partners and examines the geographical and sectoral contours of the GEP. It also evaluates the roles of Russia and China within this framework. The study demonstrates how Russia and China are advancing an inter-civilizational partnership across Eurasia. It identifies the levels of integration intensity across key spheres of cooperation within the GEP: natural resources and energy, food, technology, human capital, R&D, infrastructure, and monetary-financial systems. The analysis highlights significant economic complementarity between Russia and China, alongside a notable imbalance favouring China. This disparity is especially pronounced in the technological sector, where China holds 69.9 % of manufacturing capacities compared to Russia’s 4.1 %; in R&D, with China accounting for 95.4 % of patent applications versus Russia’s 1.3 %; and in infrastructure, where China controls 60.6 % of container port traffic compared to Russia’s 1.2 %. These integration advantages should be harnessed to shape the future development of the GEP. In order to achieve this, it is necessary to redefine Russian-Chinese cooperation by taking into account each country’s economic strengths and to leverage advanced manufacturing technologies that enhance energy, food, technological, and infrastructure security. These findings may inform policy planning and economic cooperation strategies between Russia and its international partners.
References
Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2005). Ethnic Diversity and Economic Performance. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(3), 762–800.
Andreeva, E. L., Sapir, E. V., Karkh, D. A., & Karachev, I. A. (2019). Comparative Analysis of Foreign Economic Development of Pharmaceutical Sector in Russia and the USA. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 15(2), 576–589. https://doi.org/10.17059/2019-2-20 (In Russ.)
Babaev, K. V. (2024). The idea of Greater Eurasia and the Russian economy’s turn to the East. Ekonomika Tsentral’noi Azii [Journal of Central Asia Economy], 8(2), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.18334/asia.8.2.121012 (In Russ.)
Babaev, K. V., Kortunov, A. V., Feng, Y., & Gao, J. (2023). Rossiisko-kitaiskii dialog: model’ 2023 [Russian-Chinese Dialogue: The 2023 Model]. Moscow: RIAC, 88. (In Russ.)
Bordachev, T. V. (2015). New Eurasianism – how to make interface working. Rossiya v global’noi politike [Russia in Global Affairs], 13(5), 194–205. (In Russ.)
Diamond, A. (2024). A globalization diversity ideology. SN Social Sciences, 4, 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-024-00847-3
Fomina, M. N. (2022). New model of dialogue in context of the Russian-Chinese humanitarian cooperation. Bol’shaya Evraziya: razvitie, bezopasnost’, sotrudnichestvo [Greater Eurasia: development, security, cooperation], (5-1), 556–558. (In Russ.)
Gavritukhin, A. V., & Ivanova, N. I. (2023). Characteristics of developing Russian-Chinese foreign economic relations in 2019–2023. Ekonomicheskie otnosheniya [Journal of International Economic Affairs], 13(4), 819–830. https://doi.org/10.18334/eo.13.4.119250 (In Russ.)
Gerasimov, V. I., & Kodaneva, S. I. (2023). Greater Eurasia: National and civilizational aspects of development and cooperation. Vek globalizatsii [Age of globalization], (2), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.30884/vglob/2023.02.08 (In Russ.)
Giddens, A. (2000). Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping Our Lives. Routledge.
Glazyev, S. Yu. (2021). How to Build a Great Eurasian Partnership? Evraziiskaya integratsiya: ekonomika, pravo, politika [Eurasian integration: economics, law, politics], 15(3), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.22394/2073–2929-2021-03-9-14 (In Russ.)
Glazyev, S. Yu. (2024). On the Agenda of Advanced Development in the New World Economic Order. Evraziiskaya integratsiya: ekonomika, pravo, politika [Eurasian integration: economics, law, politics], 18(3), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.22394/2073–2929-2024-03-9-10 (In Russ.)
Gross-Gołacka, E., & Martyniuk, A. (2024). Globalisation and the Challenges of Managing Cultural Diversity: From Multiculturalism to Interculturalism. Journal of Intercultural Management, 16(3), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.2478/joim-2024–0010
He, M., Shkvarya, L. V., & Wang, X. (2020). China: socio-economic development and foreign trade. Aziya i Afrika segodnya [Asia and Africa Today], (11), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.31857/S032150750012178-7 (In Russ.)
Huntington, S. P. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster, 369.
Jixiang, G., & Jing, J. (2022). Scientific, Technological and Innovation Cooperation Between China and Russia in the New Era: Reshaping the Model and Choosing an Approach from the Perspective of Chinese Experts. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 33(6), 656–662. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700722060053
Karpova, A. A. (2022). Sino-Russian Trade and Economic Cooperation in the Arctic. Rossiiskii vneshneekonomicheskii vestnik [Russian Foreign Economic Journal], (3), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.24412/2072–8042-2022-3-113-120 (In Russ.)
Koopmans, R. (2013). Multiculturalism and Immigration: A Contested Field in Cross-National Comparison. Annual Review of Sociology, 39(1), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312–145630
Li, Y. (2018). The greater Eurasian partnership and the Belt and Road Initiative: Can the two be linked? Journal of Eurasian Studies, 9(2), 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2018.07.004
Li, Z. (2017). The Greater Eurasian Partnership: Remodeling the Eurasian Order?. China International Studies, 46-65.
Lukin, A. V. (2020). Russia and China in Greater Eurasia. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies], (5), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.05.04 (In Russ.)
Lukonin, S., & Vakhrushin, I. (2023). Russian-Chinese Trade and Economic Cooperation amid Anti-Russian Sanctions. Rossiya i ATR [Russia and the Pacific,] (1), 160–180. https://doi.org/10.24412/1026–8804-2023-1-160-180 (In Russ.)
Rakova, K. V. (2021). The clash or cooperation of civilizations? Current reviews of Huntington’s theory from western specialists. Problemy tsivilizatsionnogo razvitiya [Civilization studies review], 3(2), 20–50. https://doi.org/10.21146/2713–1483-2021-3-2-20-50 (In Russ.)
Rodrik, D. (1997). Has Globalization Gone Too Far?. Institute for International Economics.
Rybina, M. V. (2013). Civilizational approach: opportunities and prospects. Izvestiya MGTU “MAMI”, 7(1-6), 70–77. https://doi.org/10.17816/2074–0530-67795 (In Russ.)
Sanai, M. (2015). Globalization and multi-culturalismus: changing in terms and backgrounds. Vek globalizatsii [Age of globalization], (2), 48–58. (In Russ.)
Sankin, L. A. (Ed.) (2008). Dialog kul’tur i partnerstvo tsivilizatsii: VIII Mezhdunarodnye Likhachevskie nauchnye chteniya, 22-23 maya 2008 g. [Dialogue of cultures and partnership of civilizations: VIII International scientific readings named after D. Likhachev (May, 22-23, 2008)]. Saint-Petersburg: Saint-Petersburg University of the Humanities and Social Sciences Publ., 528. (In Russ.)
Sen, A. (2006). Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny. W. W. Norton & Company.
Shkvarya, L. V., & Frolova, E. D. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Foreign Trade Development in the Digital Segment by World Regions. Ekonomika region [Economy of regions], 18(2), 479–493. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-2-13 (In Russ.)
Spartak, A. N. (2018). Sovremennye transformatsionnye protsessy v mezhdunarodnoi torgovle i interesy Rossii [Contemporary transformation processes in international trade and interests of Russia]. Moscow: Russian Foreign Trade Academy, 456. (In Russ.)
Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and Its Discontents. W.W. Norton & Company.
Zhao, H. (2018). Greater Eurasian Partnership: Chinas Perspective. China International Studies, 68(1), 68–84.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Андреева Елена Леонидовна , Ратнер Артем Витальевич , Ильясов Пётр Владимирович
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
