Approaches to Achieving Technological Sovereignty in the European Union, Russia, and China: Theory and Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2025-3-13Keywords:
technological sovereignty, conceptual model of technological sovereignty, emerging technologies, technology transfer, innovations, industrial potential, sanctions, autarky, localization, import substitution, international scientific cooperationAbstract
In recent years, technological sovereignty, its constituent elements, and the pathways to achieving it have become a central focus of academic discussion both internationally and in Russia. For Russia, the issue has become especially important in the face of sanctions imposed to restrict access to advanced technologies, the outcomes of international research, and broader global cooperation. This article examines both the theoretical foundations and practical dimensions of achieving technological sovereignty in the EU, Russia, and China. It identifies distinct strategic patterns: the EU’s emphasis on multilateral cooperation, Russia’s reliance on domestic capabilities, and China’s strategy of technology acquisition followed by domestic adaptation and scaling. The study relies on content analysis and a retrospective review of empirical materials, including international rankings (competitiveness, innovation capacity, cybersecurity, etc.), strategic and regulatory policy documents from the given countries, as well as analytical reports and scholarly publications (2014–2024). It proposes a conceptual model of technological sovereignty comprising four universal structural components: (1) emerging technologies, (2) a scientific and production base supported by innovation infrastructure, (3) effective state-led economic policy instruments, and (4) exclusive national resources (natural, intellectual, and financial). While these core elements remain constant, the mechanisms for their implementation differ depending on the specific developmental conditions of each state. The findings provide a foundation for further cross-national analysis of technological sovereignty as a driver of industrial and innovation capacity among the world’s leading economies.
References
Afanasyev, A. A. (2022). Technological sovereignty as a scientific category in the contemporary knowledge system. Ekonomika, predprinimatel’stvo i pravo [Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law], 12 (9), 2377–2394. https://doi.org/10.18334/epp.12.9.116243 (In Russ.)
Aganbegyan, A. G. (2022). Russia: From stagnation to sustainable socio-economic growth. Nauchnye trudy Vol’nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii [Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia], 237 (5), 310–362. https://doi.org/10.38197/2072–2060-2022-237-5-310-362 (In Russ.)
Amosov, A. I. (2024). Goal setting and strategy for ensuring technological sovereignty. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost’ [Economic security], 7 (3), 693–718. https://doi.org/10.18334/ecsec.7.3.120766 (In Russ.)
Andreeva, O. V. (2014). Technological and financial sovereignty of the Russian Federation: Challenges, contradictions and facilitating mechanisms. Voprosy regulirovaniya ekonomiki [Journal of Economic Regulation], 5 (4), 126–135. (In Russ.)
Bauer, M., & Erixon, F. (2020). Europe’s quest for technology sovereignty: Opportunities and pitfalls. ECIPE occasional paper, (02/2020). Brussels: European Centre for International Political Economy (ECIPE), 42.
Baydarov, D. Y., & Faykov, D. Y. (2023). Diversifikatsiya v atomnoi otrasli Rossii. Metodologicheskie i prakticheskie aspekty [Diversification in the Russian nuclear industry. Methodology and practical aspects]. Moscow: Pero, 237. (In Russ.)
Baydarov, D. Y., Polosin, A. V., & Faykov, D. Y. (2023). Formation of a new model of the domestic economy in the context of technological sovereignty: principles and mechanisms. Voprosy innovatsionnoi ekonomiki [Russian Journal of Innovation Economics], 13 (2), 669–688. https://doi.org/10.18334/vinec.13.2.117949 (In Russ.)
Binz, C., & Truffer, B. (2017). Global Innovation Systems–A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts. Research Policy, 46 (7), 1284–1298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.012
Chuprova, O. G., & Billier, J. -C. (2021). Transfer of technologies and knowledge in France: intermediary structures and their role. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba [Public Administration], 23 (6(134)), 83–90. (In Russ.)
Crespi, F., Caravella, S., Menghini, M. & Salvatori, C. (2021). European technological sovereignty: An emerging framework for policy strategy. Intereconomics, 56 (6), 348–354. DOI 10.1007/s10272-021-1013-6
Danilin, I. V., & Sidorova, E. A. (2024). The concept of technological sovereignty in the transforming world. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii [Journal of the New Economic Association], (3(64)), 238–243. https://doi.org/10.31737/22212264_2024_3_238-243 (In Russ.)
Dementiev, V. E. (2023). Technological sovereignty and priorities of localization of production. Terra Economicus, 21 (1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.18522/2073–6606-2023-21-1-6-18 18 (In Russ.)
Drozhzhin, D. I. (2024). Arrangements for achieving technological sovereignity: international expertise and russian realities. Gorizonty ekonomiki [Horizons of Economics], (4(84)), 77–85. (In Russ.)
Edler, J., Blind, K., Frietsch, R., Kimpeler, S., Kroll, H., Lerch, C., Reiss, T., Roth, F., Schubert, T., Schuler, J, & Walz, R. (2020). Technology sovereignty. From demand to concept. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, 32. https://doi.org/10.24406/publica-fhg-300409
Efimov, A. V., & Tikhonovskova, S. A. (2022). Technological sovereignty of Russia in the context of strategic goals for the development of the regional economy. Drukerovskii vestnik [Drucker’s Bulletin], (4), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.17213/2312–6469-2022-4-165-172 (In Russ.)
Faltsman, V. K. (2018). Statistical Measurements of Russia’s Technological Sovereignty. Sovremennaya Evropa [Contemporary Europe], (3(82)), 83–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/soveurope320188391 (In Russ.)
Fuenfschilling, L., & Binz, C. (2018). Global socio-technical regimes. Research Policy, 47 (4), 735–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.003
Glazunova, V. V. (2024). Measuring technological development and sovereignty. Ekonomika nauki [Economics of Science], 10 (3), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2024-10-3-22-33 (In Russ.)
Glazyev, S. Yu. (2021). Strategic planning as an integrative feature in development management system. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii [The Economic Revival of Russia], 3 (69), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.37930/1990–9780-2021-3-69-14-19 (In Russ.)
Gushchina, E. A., Makarenko, G. I., & Sergin, M. Y. (2018). Ensuring information and technological sovereignty of the state under the conditions of development of digital economy. Pravo.by [Law.by], (6 (56)), 59–63. (In Russ.)
Huotari, M., Weidenfeld, J., & Wessling, C. (Eds.) (2020). Towards a “principles-first approach” in Europe’s China policy. Drawing lessons from the Covid-19 crisis. Merics papers on China, (9). Berlin: MERICS, 96.
Kapoguzov, E. A., & Pakhalov, A. M. (2024). Technological sovereignty: Conceptual approaches and perceptions by the Russian academic experts. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii [Journal of the New Economic Association], (3(64)), 244–250. https://doi.org/10.31737/22212264_2024_3_244-250 (In Russ.)
Konstantinov, I. B., & Konstantinova, E. P. (2022). Technological sovereignty as a strategy for the future development of the Russian economy. Vestnik Povolzhskogo instituta upravleniya [Bulletin of the Volga Region Institute of Administration], 22 (5), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.22394/1682–2358-2022-5-12-22 (In Russ.)
March, С., & Schieferdecker, I. (2021). Technological Sovereignty as Ability, Not Autarky. CESifo Working Papers, (9139). Munich: Society for the Promotion of Economic Research — CESifo GmbH, 39.
Medvedeva, N. V. (2024). Approaches to technological sovereignty assessment. Voprosy innovatsionnoi ekonomiki [Russian Journal of Innovation Economics], 14 (1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.18334/vinec.14.1.120653 (In Russ.)
Mojsejchik, G. I., & Faradzhov, T. I. (2015). Financial and technological sovereignty as a development principle for a global social market economy paradigm. Oikonomos: Journal of Social Market Economy, (2(3)), 47–67. (In Russ.)
Pishik, V. Ya., & Alekseev, P. V. (2022). Features and Directions of Transformation of the Management Model of the Financial and Economic System of Russia in the Context of Increasing Global Challenges. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo [Economics, taxes & law], 15 (4), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2022-15-4-6-16 (In Russ.)
Ponomarenko, E. V. (2023). Transition to a multipolar world and competition for global technological leadership: politico-economic issues. Gorizonty ekonomiki [Horizons of Economics], (6(79)), 5–15. (In Russ.)
Ponomarenko, E. V. (2024). Technological sovereignty of Russia: theoretical and practical issues. Nauchnye trudy Vol’nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii [Scientific works of the free economic society of Russia], 248 (4), 580–590. https://doi.org/10.38197/2072–2060-2024-248-4-580-590 (In Russ.)
Ponomarenko, E. V., & Oddo, V. (2021). Introducing innovation: how to turn administrative barriers into administrative springboards? Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba [Public Administration], 23 (6(134)), 75–82. (In Russ.)
Potapceva, E. V., Akberdina, V. V., & Ponomareva, A. O. (2024). The Concept of Technological Sovereignty in the State Policy of Contemporary Russia. AlterEconomics, 21 (4), 818–842. https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2024.21-4.9
Shkodinsky, S. V., Kushnir, A. M., & Prodchenko, I. A. (2022). The impact of sanctions on Russia’s technological sovereignty. Problemy rynochnoi ekonomiki [Market economy problems], (2), 75–96. (In Russ.)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Пономаренко Елена Васильевна , Дрожжин Денис Игоревич

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

