Assessing Spatial Development Priorities in Sverdlovsk Oblast (Russia) Through SAR Modelling and Autocorrelation Analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2024-4-9

Keywords:

priorities of spatial development, distribution of productive forces, spatial autocorrelation analysis, spatial autoregressive modelling SAR, spatial mutual influences, municipalities

Abstract

Disparities in the socio-economic development of regions necessitate clearer priority-setting for their spatial growth and sustainable economic progress. The hypothesis of this study is that the primary goal for the region’s spatial development should be to establish “growth poles” in municipalities with a high concentration of resources and strong connections to surrounding areas. The study aims to develop a method to identify and justify these spatial development priorities, using municipalities in Sverdlovsk oblast as a case study. Within the proposed methodology, territories were divided into two subgroups within the quadrants of P. Moran’s scatter plot, based on spatial interaction levels, to identify both existing and emerging growth poles, as well as areas of strong and moderate influence. The effectiveness of selected priorities was assessed by applying a differentiated approach to building spatial SAR models. As a result, two groups of territories were categorized: spatially interconnected areas, which include growth poles and regions forming spatial clusters along with their influence zones, and spatially remote areas. Findings indicate that the spatial development priorities of Sverdlovsk oblast should focus on establishing growth poles in municipalities with a high concentration of enterprises, labour, and investment resources (e.g., Nizhny Tagil and Kamensk-Uralsky), as well as in municipalities within the strong influence zone of an active growth pole (e.g., Berezovsky, Verkhnyaya Pyshma, and others). It is essential to strengthen cooperative relationships between municipalities, particularly in the influence zone of Ekaterinburg agglomeration, as highlighted by P. Moran’s spatial autocorrelation analysis.

Author Biographies

Natalia L. Nikulina , Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Senior Researcher of the Laboratory of Modelling of the Spatial Development of the Territories; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6882-3172; Scopus Author ID: 55960144700 (29, Moskovskaya St., 620014, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation; e-mail: nikulina.nl@uiec.ru).

Ilya V. Naumov , Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS

Сand.Sci. (Econ.), Head of the Laboratory of Modelling of the Spatial Development of the Territories; http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2464-6266; Scopus Author ID: 57204050061 (29, Moskovskaya St., 620014, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation; e-mail: naumov.iv@uiec.ru).

References

Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Springer Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7799-1

Bandman, M. K. (1980). Territorial’no-proizvodstvennye kompleksy: teoriya i praktika predplanovykh issledovanii [Territorial-production complexes: theory and practice of pre-planned research]. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 256. (In Russ.)

Belyaeva, A. V. (2012). Spatial models in mass appraisal of real estate. Komp’yuternye issledovaniya i modelirovanie [Computer research and modeling], 4 (3), 639-650. (In Russ.)

Boudeville, J. R. (1966). Problems of regional economic planning. Edinburgh U.P.

Bychkova, A. A. (2024). Possibilities of using econometrical methods in studying of interregional interactions of migration in transportation. Vestnik Universiteta, (2), 86-94. https://doi.org/10.26425/1816–4277-2024-2-86-94 (In Russ.)

Demidova, O. A. (2014). Spatial-autoregressive model for the two groups of related regions (eastern and western parts of Russia). Prikladnaya ekonometrika [Applied Econometrics], (34(2)), 19-35. (In Russ.)

Dubrovskaya, Ju. V. (2020). Analysis of heterogeneity of economic development of territories in the conditions of digitalization. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya «Ekonomika» [Herald of Omsk University. Series “Economics”], 18 (2), 102-113. https://doi.org/10.24147/1812–3988.2020.18(2).102-113 (In Russ.)

Karim, A., Suhartono & Prastyo, D. D. (2020). Spatial Spillover Effect on Transportation Infrastructure on Regional Growth. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of regions], 16 (3), 911-920. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-3-18

Kolomak, E. (2013). Uneven Spatial Development in Russia: Explanations of New Economic Geography. Voprosy Ekonomiki, (2), 132-150. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042–8736-2013-2-132-150 (In Russ.)

Kolosovsky, N. N. (1969). Teoriya ekonomicheskogo raionirovaniya [The Theory of Economic Zoning]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., 336. (In Russ.)

Kovalenko, E. G., Polushkina, T. M., Yakimova, O. Yu., & Akimova, Yu. A. (2021). Tools to Overcome Internal Socio-Economic Inequality. Regionologiya [Regionology], 29 (3), 611-641. https://doi.org/10.15507/2413–1407.116.029.202103.611-641 (In Russ.)

Krasnykh, S. S. (2023). Measuring the level of digitalisation of Russian regions from the position of inter-regional interaction. Informatsionnoe obshchestvo [Information Society], (3), 120-128. (In Russ.)

Lavrikova, Yu. G., & Suvorova, A. V. (2020). Optimal spatial organization of regional economy: search for parameters and dependencies. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 16 (4), 1017–1030. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-4-1 (In Russ.)

Lesh, A. (2007). Prostranstvennaya organizatsiya khozyaistva [The spatial order of the economy: An investigation of the location, economic areas and international trade]. Moscow: Nauka, 663. (In Russ.)

Manaeva, I. V., & Rastvortseva, S. N. (2021). Prostranstvennoe razvitie gorodov Rossii: teoriya, analiz, modelirovanie: monografiya [Spatial development of Russian cities: theory, analysis, modeling: monograph. Belgorod Belgorod State National Research University, 196. (In Russ.)

Marshall, A. (1910). Principles of Economics. Macmillan and Co.

Minakir, P. A. (2011). Spatial heterogeneity of Russia and regional policy objectives. Zhurnal novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii [Journal of the New Economic Association], (10(10)), 150-153. (In Russ.)

Moran, P. A. (1948). The interpretation of statistical maps. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 10 (2), 243-251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517–6161.1948.tb00012.x

Naumov, I. V., & Nikulina, N. L. (2023a). Assessment and Modelling of Spatial Interactions in the Development of Research Personnel in Russian Regions. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of regions], 19 (3), 782-800. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-3-13 (In Russ.)

Naumov, I. V., & Nikulina, N. L. (2023b). Modeling Spatial Effects of Innovative Development in Russia’s Regions. Problemy razvitiya territorii [Problems of Territory’s Development], 27 (6), 121-140. https://doi.org/10.15838/ptd.2023.6.128.8 (In Russ.)

Naumov, I. V., & Sedelnikov, V. M. (2023). Forecasting the impact of investments on spatial heterogeneity in the development of the livestock industry. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz [Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast], 16 (2), 88-111. https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2023.2.86.5 (In Russ.)

Pavlov, Y. V., & Koroleva, E. N. (2014). Spatial Interactions: Evaluation with the Help of Global and Local Moran’s Index. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika [Spatial Economics], (3), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.14530/se.2014.3.95-110 (In Russ.)

Perroux, F. (2007). Economic space: Theory and applications. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika [Spatial Economics], (2), 77-93. (In Russ.)

Porter, M. (1993). Mezhdunarodnaya konkurentsiya. Konkurentnye preimushchestva stran [Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance]. Moscow: International relations, 378. (In Russ.)

Sapozhnikova, A. G. (2011). Heterogeneity of spatial location of Russian big businesses. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gos. un-ta. Ser. 3, Ekonomika. Ekologiya [Journal of Volgograd State University. Ser. 3, Economics. Ecology], (2(19)), 120-126. (In Russ.)

Thünen, J. von (1926). Izolirovannoe gosudarstvo [The isolated state in relation to agriculture and economics]. Moscow: Ekonomicheskaya zhizn’, 326 (In Russ.)

Timiryanova, V. M., Grishin, K. E., Solodilova, N. Z., & Malikov, R. I. (2022). Economic Growth of Municipalities in Russia: Assessment of Unevenness in Time and Space. Journal of Applied Economic Research, 21 (3), 514-544. http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2022.21.3.018 (In Russ.)

Timiryanova, V. M., Zimin, A. F., & Yusupov, K. N. (2021). Economic Activity of Territories: Comparative Analysis of the Spatial Effects Assessing Methods. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika [Spatial Economics], 17 (4), 41-68. https://doi.org/10.14530/se.2021.4.041-068 (In Russ.)

Weber, A. (1926). Teoriya razmeshcheniya promyshlennosti [Theory of industrial location]. Leningrad – Moscow: Kniga Publ., 119. (In Russ.)

Published

29.12.2024

How to Cite

Nikulina Н. Л. ., & Naumov И. В. . (2024). Assessing Spatial Development Priorities in Sverdlovsk Oblast (Russia) Through SAR Modelling and Autocorrelation Analysis. Economy of Regions, 20(4), 1102–1119. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2024-4-9

Issue

Section

Regional Economy