Russia And Germany: Search For A New Model Of Neo-Industrial Social State

Authors

  • Yelena Leonidovna Andreyeva Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
  • Marion Date Friedrich Schiller University Jena; “Interculture.de” Consulting Agency
  • Artem Vitalyevich Ratner Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17059/2015-1-15

Keywords:

neo-industrial social state, economic humanism, social market economy, social progress, social responsibility and motivation, strategy and policy of socio-economic development

Abstract

Russia and Germany are traditionally reputed as countries with socially oriented economies. Namely, these countries are also close by the index of the share of real sector of economy at GDP. And however, Germany is a founder of social market household largely defined its leadership in world economy, in current conditions of crisis of “the state of general welfare” the search of a new model of development for Germany is also important as for Russia stood on the way of modernization and neo-industrialization. In the article, the hypothesis about forming of the new model of development uniting the social orientation of economy, processes of neoindustrialization, and globalization is made. At the same time, the social orientation is the main aim of socio-economic development, neo-industrialization is a way to achieve it, and globalization is a criterion presupposing more effective use of resources. Theoretical backgrounds of development of “social state” are generalized in the works of German and Russian classics put the backgrounds of economic humanism, it has allowed to prove the fatality of modernization process without considering of deep mental backgrounds and civilization codes of the nation development. The methodological approaches to development of a new model of neo-industrial social state with emphasizing different levels: global, national, local, individual are worked out; and the technique for estimation of factors and conditions of its development is proposed. The technique is tested on the example of Russia and Germany, The comparative analysis conducted has allowed to make the conclusion about similarity of target guidelines, initial conditions, problems and ways of their solving in these countries, that is to be considered both in a strategy and a policy of socio-economic development of these countries and by their international partnership.

Author Biographies

Yelena Leonidovna Andreyeva, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Head of the Center of Regional Comparative Research, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (29, Moskovskaya St., Yekaterinburg, 620014, Russia, e-mail: elenandr@mail.ru).

Marion Date, Friedrich Schiller University Jena; “Interculture.de” Consulting Agency

Doctor of Philology at the Department of Intercultural Communication in Economy of Friedrich Schiller University Jena (Germany), Head of “Interculture.de” Consulting Agency ((77, Lutherstr, Jena 07743, Germany, e-mail: dialog@interculture.de).

Artem Vitalyevich Ratner, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

PhD in Economics, Research Assistant at the Center of Regional Comparative Research, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (29, Moskovskaya St., Yekaterinburg, 620014, Russia, e-mail: aratner@inbox.ru).

References

Ratnikov, A. Tyulpan zavyal. Korol Niderlandov obyavil o zavershenii epokhi «vseobshchego blagosostoyaniya» [The tulip faded. The king of the Netherlands declared the end of the «general welfare» era]. Lenta.ru. Available at: http://lenta.ru/articles/2013/09/19/netherlands (date of access: 15.1.2015).

Sozialbudgetleistung. Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschlands. Available at: https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/GesellschaftStaat/Soziales/Sozialbudget/Tabellen/SozialbudgetLeistung2009_2010.html (Zugang: 21.5.2014).

Henkel, H.O. (2008). Jetzt oder nie. Berlin.

Kartsev, D. (2011, November 27). Vtoraya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya [The second industrial revolution]. Russkiy reportyor [Russian reporter], 42.

Arkhangelskiy, Yu. (2014). Neoindustializatsiya. Nekotoryye polemicheskie soobrazheniya [Neoindustrialization. Some polemic thoughts]. Ekonomist [Economist], 5, 3.

Veshkanov, G. (2014). Demagogiya protiv novoy industrializatsii, ili popytka s negodnymi sredstvami [Demagogy against new industrialization, or an attempt with improper means]. Ekonomist [Economist], 7, 3.

Hirsch-Kreinsen, H. (2014). Wandel von Produktionsarbeit — „Industrie 4.0“. Soziologisches Arbeitspapier, 38.

Schoessler, M. (2013). Welche Innovationspolitik brauchen wir in Deutschland? Zukunft der Innovation.

Seeber, S. & Vassiliadis, M. (2013). Die Zukunft der Arbeitswelt — Auf dem Weg ins Jahr 2030. Bericht der Kommission «Zukunft der Arbeitswelt» der Robert Bosch Stiftung mit Unterstützung des Instituts für Beschäftigung und Employability IBE.

Abschlussbericht des Staatssekretärsausschusses zu «Rechtsfragen und Herausforderungen bei der Inanspruchnahme der sozialen Sicherungssysteme durch Angehörige der EU-Mitgliedstaaten». Bundesministerium des Innern, Bundesministerium fuer Arbeit und Soziales. Available at: http://www.bmi.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Broschueren/2014/abschlussbericht-armutsmigration.pdf?__blob=publicationFile (Zugang: 13.1.2015).

Kuzmin, A. I., Lavrikova, Yu. G., Neklyudova, N. P., Struin, N. L., Ilinbayeva, Ye. A. & Tretyak, A. N. (2014). Mezhstranovyy obmen mneniyami po problemam sotsialnogo zdorovya inostrannykh trudovykh migrantov [Intercountry exchange of opinions on issues of social health of foreign labor migrants]. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii [Journal of economic theory], 2, 150-152.

Stein, L. von. (1850). Geschichte der sozialen Bewegung in Frankreich vom 1789 bis auf unsere Tage. Leipzig.

Biryukov, S. Klassik gosudarstvennogo sotsializma. Sintez Lassalya [Classic of the state socialism. Lassal’s synthesis]. Available at: http://www.apn.ru/publications/article17656.htm (date of access: 13.1.2015)

Mueller-Armack, A. (1981). Soziale marktwirtschaft. 1956. Handwörterbuch der Sozialwissenschaften, wieder abgedruckt. Wirtschaftsordnung und Wirtschaftspolitik, 3. Aufl. Bern und Stuttgart, 243-249.

Erkhard, L. (1991). Blagosostoyanie dlya vsekh [Well-being for all]. Moscow, Ekonomika [Economics].

Solovyov, V. S. (1990). Sochineniya: v 2-kh t. T.1 [Essays in 2 vol. Vol.1]. Moscow, Mysl.

Stozhko, K. P. (1995). Ekonomicheskiy gumanizm v Rossii [Economic humanism in Russia]. Yekaterinburg, Izd-vo Ural. gos. prof.-ped. un-ta [Ural State Professional and Pedagogical University Publ.].

Bogomolov, O. T. (2003). Razmyshleniya o nasushchnom [Considerations on vital]. Moscow, Ekonomika [Economics].

Nekipelov, A. D. (2013). K voprosu ob ekonomicheskom roste i ekonomicheskom razvitii [To a question of economic growth and economic development]. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii [Journal of economic theory], 4, 10-12.

Doklad Komissii po otsenke ekonomicheskikh rezultatov i sotsialnogo progressa [Report of the Commission on the assessment of economic results and social progress]. Voprosy statistiki [Questions of statistics], 11, 12-21.

Mast, K., Schurer, E. & Kapschack, R. Arbeits- und Sozialhaushalt 2015: Investitionen in die Zukunft. SPD — Bundestagsfraktion. 27.11.2014. Available at: http://www.spdfraktion.de/presse/pressemitteilungen/arbeits-und-sozialhaushalt-2015-investitionen-die-zukunft (Zugang: 13.1.2015)

Kozlova, O. A., Shelomentsev, A. G. & Petrovskaya A. A. (2014). Metodicheskie voprosy otsenki sotsialnoy rezultativnosti proektov gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnyorstva v sfere zdravookhraneniya [Methodical questions of an assessment of social productivity of projects of public-private partnership in the health sector]. Vestnik Orenburgskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Orenburg University], 8(169), 20-23.

Bax. M. Wie funktionert eine duale Ausbildung. Bildungsxperten. Available at: http://www.bildungsxperten.net/wissen/wie-funktioniert-eine-duale-ausbildung/ (Zugang: 13.1.2015)

Tatarkin, A. O. & Andreyeva, Ye.L. (2014). Formirovanie postindustrialnogo sotsialnogo gosudarstva: vektor razvitiya chelovecheskogo potentsiala [Development of the post-industrial social state: vector of human development]. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya [Problems of the theory and practice of management], 7, 24-31.

Fuchs, T. Arbeit & Prekariat. Ausmaβ und Problemlagen atypischer Beschäftigungsverhältnisse. Hans Böckler Stiftung. Available at: http://www.boeckler.de/pdf_fof/S-2005-722-3-2.pdf (Zugang: 13.1.2015).

Hevitt, A. (2013). Die Bedeutung freiwilliger Nebenleistungen beim Gehalt steigt. Lohn- und GehaltsPROFI aktuell. Ausgabe 2. [Elektronische Quelle].

Downloads

Published

26.03.2015

How to Cite

Andreyeva, Y. L., Date, M., & Ratner, A. V. (2015). Russia And Germany: Search For A New Model Of Neo-Industrial Social State. Economy of Regions, 11(1), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.17059/2015-1-15

Issue

Section

Research articles