Государство - регион - отрасль - предприятие: каркас системной устойчивости экономики России. Часть 2
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2015-3-1Ключевые слова:
economics system stability, subjects ofeconomy, system structure of subject, system structure of subject environment, balance of system complex, new economic systems theoryАннотация
Part 2 In the article, the factors of a stability of the Russian economy are investigated from the systematic positions as a multilevel, multisubject and multidimensional socio-economic system. The concept of economics system stability as abilities to keep prerequisites for growth with the support and effective use of system structure of economy is formulated. The leading role of all economic subjects of different levels (including government as a subject of the international relations, regions as the subjects of Federation, enterprises as economic entities) in economic stability is shown. The need of "extension" of a network of subjects due to strengthening of the subjectivity of economic fields is emphasized. Research of an internal basic system structure of an economic subject and external structure of its immediate environment in socioeconomic, administrative-and-managerial, and market spaces with the use of the results of the new theory of economic systems leads to a conclusion of similarity of these structures. It is shown that each of these system complexes includes (together with a subject) four systems of various types - object, environmental, processed, and designed. The system environment of a subject in the administrative-and-managerial space of inter-level interactions has the same structure. It gives the chance to reduce a problem of subjects' resistance to a question of balance of system structures of the complexes forming an internal filling and an external environment of subjects. The method of balance index of similar complexes is given. Recommendations on a choice of the measures of economic policy for providing economics system stability of Russia during the crisis are formulated. It is shown that such policy has to be developed with the principles of a subject-preservation, system balance of internal filling and external environment of subjects, a corporate solidarity of subjects despite their level in the administrative hierarchy.Библиографические ссылки
Makarov, V. L. & Bakhtizin, A. R. (2013). Sotsialnoye modelirovanie — novyy kompyuternyy proryv (agent-oriyentirovannyye modeli) [Social modeling — new computer breakthrough (agent-based models)]. Moscow: Ekonomika Publ., 295.
Makarov, V. L., Ayvazyan, S. A., Afanasyev, M. Yu., Bakhtizin, A. R. & Nanavyan, A. M. (2014). Otsenka effektivnosti regionov RF s uchyotom intellektualnogo kapitala, kharakteristik gotovnosti k innovatsiyam, urovnya blagosostoyaniya i kachestva zhizni naseleniya [Efficiency estimation of Russian regions based on population intellectual capital, characteristics of readiness for innovation, level of welfare and quality of life]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 4, 22-30.
Kleiner, G. B. (2013). Sistemnaya ekonomika kak platforma razvitiya sovremennoy ekonomicheskoy teorii [System economy as а platform for development of modern economic theory]. Voprosy ekonomiki [Questions of economy], 6, 4-28.
Kornai, J. (1998). The System Paradigm. William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 278. William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan, 26.
Kornai, J. (2002) Sistemnaya paradigma [The System Paradigm]. Voprosy ekonomiki [Questions of economy], 5, 4-22.
Bertalanffy, L. von. (1956). General System Theory. General Systems, I, 1-10.
Boulding, K. E. (1956). General systems theory — the skeleton of science. Management Science, 2(3), 197-208.
Hodgson, G. M. (1987). Economics and Systems Theory. Journal of Economic Studies, 14 (4), 65-86.
Minakir, P. A. & Demyanenko A. N. (2010). Prostranstvennaya ekonomika: evolyutsiya podkhodov i metodologiya [The spatial economy: evolution of approaches and methodology]. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii [Economic science of modern Russia], 3, 7-26.
Asada, T., Ishikawa, T. (2007). Time and Space in Economics. Springer, 314.
Kachalov, R. M. & Yakovleva, N. V. (2014). Kompleksnyy podkhod k analizu kachestva upravleniya sotsialno-ekonomicheskim razvitiem regiona [Complex approach to analysis of management quality of region socioeconomic development]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 4, 129-139.
Kleiner, G. B. (2011). Sistemny resurs ekonomiki [The system resource of the economy]. Voprosy ekonomiki [Questions of economy], 1, 89-100.
Georgiou, I. (2007). Thinking Through Systems Thinking. Routledge, 264.
Blaug, M. (1994). Ekonomicheskaya mysl v retrospektive [Economic thought in retrospective]. Moscow: Delo Ltd. Publ., 720.
Kleiner, G. B. (2004). Nanoekonomika [Nanoeconomics]. Voprosy ekonomiki [Questions of economy], 12, 70-93.
Inshakov, O. V. (2003). Strukturnoye utochnenie soderzhanie ekonomicheskoy teorii: potentsial mnogourovnevogo podkhoda [Structural content clarification of economic theory: potential of multi-level approach]. Rossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal [Russian economic journal], 3, 84-86.
Yevstigneyeva, L. P. & Yevstigneyev R. N. (2012). Ekonomika kak sinergeticheskaya sistema [Economics as a synergetic system]. 2-e izd. [Second edition]. Moscow: Librokom Publ., 266.
Mezoekonomika perekhodnogo perioda: rynki, otrasli predpriyatiya [Mesoeconomics of transition period: markets, branches, enterprises]. (2001). Kollektivnaya monografiya pod red. chl.-korr. RAN G. B. Kleinera [The collective monograph ed. by corresponding member of RAS G. B. Kleiner]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 516.
Mezoekonomika razvitiya [Mesoeconomics of development]. (2011). Kollektivnaya monografiya pod red. chl.-korr. RAN G.B. Kleinera [The collective monograph ed. by corresponding member of RAS G. B. Kleiner]. Moscow: Nauka [Publ.], 805.
Kleiner, G. B. (2013). Kakaya ekonomika nuzhna Rossii i dlya chego? (opyt sistemnogo issledovaniya) [What economy does Russia need and for what? (experience of system analysis)]. Voprosy ekonomiki [Questions of economy], 10, 4-27.
Kleiner, G. B. (2014). Kakaya mezoekonomika nuzhna Rossii? Regionalniy razrez v svete sistemnoy ekonomicheskoy teorii [What mesoeconomics does Russia need? Regional economy in the light of system economic theory]. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Financial University], 4, 6-22.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Как цитировать
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2015 Клейнер Георгий Борисович

Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.

