Region Effective Production Assets and Their Assessment By The Production Function Method

Authors

  • Vladimir Konstantinovich Gorbunov Ulyanovsk State University
  • Vladimir Pavlovich Krylov Ulyanovsk State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17059/2015-3-27

Keywords:

regional production functions, production investments, effective fixed assets, analysis of economics

Abstract

Effective production assets of region or country are the assets that really commit in production development. According to the neoclassical rationality principle of economic agents, the effective assets have to be considered in the production functions representing the mathematical models of large production facilities (production associations, sectors, economies of regions and countries). Existence of adequate production function allows making the deep economic analysis of facility and solving planning and forecasting problems. However, the researchers have only information on the balance funds, which are often poorly reflecting the real state of economy. The indistinct effective fund concept can be formalized and assessed quantitatively within the method of the production functions (PF) on the basis of V. K. Gorbunov and A. G. Lvov’s model (2012) of the standard macroeconomic PF development, one of which factors - the capital according to the statistical information on production investments. Effective funds are estimated together with the PF parameters and the main indicators of fund dynamics: amortization and initial value. In the article, the coefficient of marketability on investment, which is a share of real use of the allocated production investments, is additionally introduced into the dynamic equation. The comprehensive assessment results of the PF parameters and effective funds for economies of the Volga and Ural Federal Districts with use of several classes of two-factorial PF are given. As the second factor, the work and energy consumption are alternatively considered. As the result of development of region PF, the macroeconomic indicators: average and marginal returns of factors, factorial elasticity, marginal rate of factor substitution, elasticity of substitution, are calculated. It increases the quality of the quantitative analysis of regional economies and objectivity of their comparison.

Author Biographies

Vladimir Konstantinovich Gorbunov, Ulyanovsk State University

Doctor of Physics and Mathematics, Professor, Senior Research Associate, Ulyanovsk State University (42, L. Tolstogo St., Ulyanovsk, 432017, Russian Federation; e-mail: vkgorbunov@mail.ru).

Vladimir Pavlovich Krylov, Ulyanovsk State University

Research Engineer, Ulyanovsk State University (42, L. Tolstogo St., Ulyanovsk, 432017, Russian Federation; e-mail: kvp88emm@rambler.ru).

References

Bessonov, V. A. (2002). Problemy postroyeniya proizvodstvennykh funktsiy v rossiyskoy perekhodnoy ekonomike [Problems of production function development in the Russian transition economy]. Bessonov, V. A., Tsukhlo, S. V. Analiz dinamiki rossiyskoy perekhodnoy ekonomiki [Dynamic analysis of the Russian transition economy]. Moscow: Institut ekonomiki perekhodnogo perioda Publ. 5-89.

Bessonov, V. A. & Voskoboynikov, I.B. (2006). O dinamike osnovnykh fondov investitsiyv rossiyskoy perekhodnoy ekonomike [On dynamics of fixed assets and investments in the Russian transition economy]. Ekonomicheskiy zhurnal VShE [HSE Economic Journal], 10, 2, 193-228.

Voskoboynikov, I.B. (2004). O korrektirovke dinamiki osnocnykh fondov v rossiyskoy ekonomike [On dynamic correction of fixed assets in the Russian economy]. Ekonomicheskiy zhurnal VShE [HSE Economic Journal], 1, 3-20.

Voskoboynikov, I. B. & Drabina, Ye. V. (2010). Istoricheskaya statistika osnovnykh fondov rossiyskoy promyshlennosti v 1970-2004 godakh [Historical statistics of fixed assets of the Russian industry in 1970-2004]. Voprosy statistiki [Questions of statistics], 3, 28-45.

Gorbunov, V. K. & Lvov, A. G. (2012). Postroyenie proizvodstvennykh funktsiy po dannym ob investitsiyakh [Production function development according to the investment data]. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody [Economics and mathematical methods], 2, 95-107.

Gorbunov, V.K. (2014). O razmernostnoy probleme v ekonomike: proizvedstvennaya funktsiya kak psevdo chyornyy yashchik [On dimensional problem in economics: production function as pseudo black box]. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii [Journal of economic theory], 1, 199-212.

Keyn, E. (1977). Ekonomicheskaya statistika i ekonometriya [Economic statistics and econometrics], 2. Moscow: Statictika Publ.

Kleyner, G.B. (1986). Proizvodstvennyye funktsii. Teoriya, metody, primenenie [Production functions. Theory, methods, application]. Moscow: Finansy i statistika [Finances and statistics], 239.

Lvov, A. G. (2012). Razvitie metodov postroyeniya proizvodstvennykh fuktsiy: diss. ... kand. ekon. nauk (08.00.13) [Development of methods of production function constructions: published summery of a PhD thesis]. Ufa: UGATU Publ., 109.

Makarov, V. L. & Afanasyeva, A. A. (2014). O razrabotke imitatsionnoy CGE-Modeli denezhnogo obrashcheniya rossiyskoy ekonomiki s tenevym i korruptsionnym sektorom [On development of imitating CGE Model of the Russian economy monetary circulation with shadow and corruption sector]. Strategicheskoye planirovaniye i razvitie predpriyatiy. Sektsiya 2. Mat-ly pyatnadtsatogo vserossiyskogo simpoziuma. Moskva, 15-16 aprelya 2014 g. [Strategic planning and development of business. Section 2. Proceedings of 15th All-Russian Symposium. Moscow, 2014, April, 15-16]. Edited by corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, G. B. Kleyner. Moscow: CEMI RAS Publ., 131-133.

Syuan, Yan (2007). Faktory i strategii razvitiya malogo promyshlennogo biznesa. Na primere Rossii i Kitaya: avtoref. diss. ... kand. ekon. nauk [Factors and development strategy of small industrial business. On the example of Russia and China: published summery of a PhD thesis]. Moscow: CEMI RAS Publ.

Khanin, G. I. & Fomin, D. A. (2007). Potreblenie i nakoplenie osnovnogo kapitala v Rossii. Alternativnaya otsenka [Consumption and accumulation of fixed capital in Russia. Alternative assessment]. Problemy prognozirovaniya [Forecasting problems], 1, 26-51.

Doms, M. (1996). Estimating capital efficiency schedules within production functions. Economic Inquiry, 34(1), 78-92.

Hackman, S. T. (2008). Production Economics: Integrating the Microeconomic and Engineering Perspectives. Berlin: Springer, 520.

Nocedal, J. & Wright, S. (2006). Numerical Optimization. New York: Springer, 664.

Robinson, J. (1953). The Production Function and the Theory of Capital. Review of Economic Studies, 21(2), 81-106.

Published

21.09.2015

How to Cite

Gorbunov, V. K., & Krylov, V. P. (2015). Region Effective Production Assets and Their Assessment By The Production Function Method. Economy of Regions, 11(3), 334–347. https://doi.org/10.17059/2015-3-27

Issue

Section

Research articles