Structural Transformations of the Economy in the Pacific Region of Russia and Efficiency Trends

Authors

  • Peter Yakovlevich Baklanov Pacific Institute of Geography, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
  • Anatoly Vladimirovich Moshkov Pacific Institute of Geography, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17059/2016-1-4

Keywords:

Pacific Russia, territorial structures of economy, added value, latitudinal economic zones, main economic activities, latitudinal profiles, mining industries, processing industries, structural transformations of economy

Abstract

Pacific Russia is considered as an aqua-territorial macro-region entering the Far Eastern Federal Okrug and its adjacent water area within a 200-mile sea economic zone. 7he macro-region has the richest nature-resource potential of a dry land and the sea, the possibilities to use the sea transport for communications of Russia and Europe with the countries of the Asian-Pacific region. In Pacific Russia, two latitudinal zones are allocated: the northern and southern ones, consisting of the territories of the Far Eastern Federal Okrug of Russia. Combinations of activities by the subjects and by the latitudinal zones are considered as the territorial structures of economy. 7he distinctions of these latitudinal zones by their socio-economic potential and the level of development are shown. By the changes of homogeneous activities in the subjects and their ratios, measured in the shares of the added cost, the assessment of the structural transformation of economy was carried out in the latitudinal zones from 2004 to 2013. The tendencies of the transformation of the territorial structures of economy were revealed in the latitudinal zones. The greatest changes of the structures of economy occurred in the northern zone for this period. In the southern zone, the structural transformations of economy were a little less, except for Sakhalin. In this case, in both latitudinal zones, a share of processing manufactures reduced and that of the extracting industries increased. The generalized assessment of the changes in social and economic efficiency (by increased personal income, labor productivity, profits) in correlation with the structural changes in the economy of the regions of Pacific Russia has been made. The authors note that an important premise for building a sufficiently sustainable system of interregional division of labor in Pacific Russia is the location of extractive industries and initial stages of the manufacturing industry activities in the northern zone, while the major manufacturing industries and interregional transport and logistics services are located in the southern zone. The article is intended for the experts and the students, interested in the problems of the development of the eastern regions of Russia.

Author Biographies

Peter Yakovlevich Baklanov, Pacific Institute of Geography, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Doctor of Geography, Member of RAS, Head of the Institute, Pacific Institute of Geography of the Far East Branch of RAS (7, Radio St., Vladivostok, Primorsky Kray, 690041, Russian Federation; e-mail: pbaklanov@tig.dvo.ru).

Anatoly Vladimirovich Moshkov, Pacific Institute of Geography, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Doctor of Geography, Professor, Head of Laboratory, Pacific Institute of Geography of the Far East Branch of RAS (7, Radio St., Vladivostok, Primorsky Kray, 690041, Russian Federation; e-mail: mavr@tig.dvo.ru).

References

Baklanov, P. Ya (Ed.). (2012). Tikhookeanskaya Rossiya: stranitsy proshlogo, nastoyashchego, budushchego [Pacific Russia: the pages of the past, the present, the future]. Vladivostok: Dalnauka Publ., 406.

Baklanov, P. Ya. (2007). Territorialnyye struktury khozyaystva v regionalnom upravlenii [The territorial structures of economy in regional governance]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 239.

Animitsa, E. G., Novikova, N. V. & Sukhikh, V. A. (2008). Dinamika, izmenenie proportsiy i soderzhaniya strukturnykh transformatsiy v ekonomike Permskogo kraya [Dynamic, changes in the proportions and the content of the structural transformations in the economy of Perm Krai]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 2, 99–115.

Bochko, V. S. (2015). Uskoryayushchie i sderzhivayushchie faktory skoordinirovannogo i sbalansirovannogo razvitiya regionov [Accelerating and constraining factors of coordinated and balanced development of regions]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 1(41), 39–52.

Granberg, A. G. (1983). Issledovanie ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Sibiri v razreze shirotnykh zon i mezoregionov [The studies of the economic development of Siberia in the context of latitudinal zones and mesoregions]. Izvestiya Sibirskogo otdeleniya Akademii nauk SSS [Bulletin of the Siberian Branch of the USSR Academy of Sciences], 3(11), 59–67. (Series: Societal Sciences).

Granberg, A. G. (Ed.) (1985). Ekonomika Sibiri v razreze shirotnykh zon [Economy of Siberia in a context of latitudinal zones]. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publ., 256.

Lamin, V. A., Malov, V. Yu et al. (Eds). (2012). Aziatskaya chast Rossii: modelirovanie ekonomicheskogo razvitiya v kontekste opyta istorii [he Asian part of Russia: modeling of economic development in the context of historical experience]. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo SO RAN Publ., 462. (Integratsionnye proekty SO RAN; Vyp. 34 [he Asian part of Russia: modeling of economic development in the context of historical experience; issue 34]).

Baklanov, P. Ya. & Moshkov, A. V. (2015). Prostranstvennaya differentsiatsiya struktury ekonomiki regionov arkticheskoy zony Rossii [Spatial differentiation of the structure of economy of the regions of the Arctic zone of Russia]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 1(41), 53–63.

Baklanov, P. Ya. & Romanov, M. T. (Eds). (2012). Geosistemy Dalnego Vostoka Rossii na rubezhe XX–XXI vekov. T. III. Territorialnyye sotsialno-ekonomicheskie struktury [The geosystems of the Russian Far East on the boundary of the 20th-21st centuries. Volume III. Territorial socio-economic structures]. Vladivostok: Dalnauka Publ., 364.

Baklanov, P., Romanov, M., Karakin, V. & Lankin, A. (2015). Projects of Development of Transcontinental Transport-Economic Belts in Northern Eurasia. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 6(2), 110–113.

Kosmachev, K. P. (1974). Pionernoye osvoenie taygi. Ekonomiko-geograficheskie problemy [The Pioneer development of Taiga (economic-geographical problems)]. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publ., 142.

Pilyasov, A. N., Kuleshov, V. V. & Seliverstov, V. E. (2013). Arkticheskaya politika v epokhu globalnoy nestabilnosti: opyt i uroki dlya Rossii [Arctic politics in the epoch of global instability: an experience and the lessons for Russia]. Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya [Region: economy and sociology], 4, 61–94.

Prisyazhnyy, M. Yu. (2010). Problemy sovershenstvovaniya form osvoeniya regionov Severa v perekhodnyy period i na perspektivu [The problems of improvement of the North regions development in a transition period and for the future]. Regionalnyye problemy preobrazovaniya ekonomiki [The regional problems of economic transformation], 3, 42–46.

Romanov, M. T. (2009). Territorialnaya organizatsiya khozyaystva slaboosvoyennykh regionov Rossii [The economic territorial organization of the undeveloped regions of Russia]. Vladivostok: Dalnauka Publ., 318.

Tatarkin, A. I. (2005). Sotsialno-ekonomicheskiy status sredinnogo regiona Rossii [Socio-economic status of the middle region of Russia]. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika [Spatial economy], 4, 21–39.

Tatarkin, A. I., Romanova, O. A., Chenyonova, R. I. & Makarova, I. V. (2012). Regionalnaya promyshlennaya politika: ot makroekonomicheskikh usloviy formirovaniya k novym institutam razvitiya [Regional industrial policy: from the formation of macro-economic conditions to the development of new institutions]. Ekaterinburg: IE UrO RAN Publ., 360.

Minakir, P. A. (2004). Ekonomicheskaya integratsiya: prostranstvennyy aspekt [The economic integration: the spatial aspect]. Ros. akad. nauk, Dal’nevostochnoe otd-nie, In-t ekon. issledovaniy [Russian Academy of Sciences, Far Eastern Branch, Economic Research Institute]. Moscow: Ekonomika Publ., 352.

Dongm S., Li, Z., Li, Y., Shi, G., Yu, H., Wang, J., Li, J., Mao, Q. & Huang, Y. (2015). Resources, Environment and Economic Patterns and Sustainable Development Modes of the Silk Road Economic Belt. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 6(2), 65–72.

Newell, J. (2004). The Russian Far East.A reference guide for conservation and development. 2nd ed. California: Daniel & Daniel Publishers, Inc., 468.

Akaha, T. (Ed.). (1997). Politics and Economics in the Russian Far East. Changing Ties with Asia-Pacific. London — N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe, 233.

Kotkin, S. & Wollf, D. (Eds) (1995). Rediscovering Russia in Asia. Siberia and the Russian Far East. London — N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe, 356.

Allen, L. C. & Koh N. (1997, July/August). Structural Reform of the Mining Industry in Asia and the Pacific Region. Asian Journal of Mining, 28–42.

Haruyama, S. & Shiraiwa, T. (Eds). (2015). Environmental Change and the Social Response in the Amur River Basin. Tokyo; Heidelberg; New York: Springer, 262.

Kuznets, S. (1973, June). Modern Economic Growth: Findings and Reflections. American Economic Review, 63(3), 247–258.

Kuznets, S. (1968). Toward a Theory of Economic Growth. New York: W.W. Norton, 122.

Savaley, V. V. & Filicheva, T. P. (2002). Regionalnaya ekonomika i finansy [Regional economy and finances]. Vladivostok: VGUES Publ., 196.

Published

21.03.2016

How to Cite

Baklanov, P. Y., & Moshkov, A. V. (2016). Structural Transformations of the Economy in the Pacific Region of Russia and Efficiency Trends. Economy of Regions, 12(1), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.17059/2016-1-4

Issue

Section

Research articles