Estimation of Flexibility of an Organization on the Ground of the Calculation of Profit Margin Rate

Авторы

  • Olga Gennadevna Rybakova Industrial University of Tyumen
  • Irina Anatolyevna Kislukhina Industrial University of Tyumen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17059/2016-4-25

Ключевые слова:

flexible development of an organization, flexibility grading, crisis, adaptability to the external environment, flexible production system, flexibility ranking score, profit margin, relative profit margin, loss-maker, cumulative cost

Аннотация

The article deals with the problem of the flexibility of an organization as the ability to adapt effectively to the external environment. The authors have identified and investigated different approaches to estimating the flexibility of an organization on the ground of flexibility grading, calculation of the general index of flexibility as well as the calculation of flexibility's ranking score. We have identified the advantages and disadvantages of these approaches. A new method of the estimation of an organization's flexibility on the ground of the calculation of relative profit margin has been developed. This method is the multifunctional assessment tool of enterprise's functionability in the current context of difficult and volatile economic environment. It allows in the early stage to identify negative trends in the production and financial figures and thus, it enables the organizational leadership to take steps in advance in order to avert a crisis in its activity. Keeping the profit margin at the same rate at the forced contraction of output, because of the negative impact of external factors, will confirm that the organization has adapted to the external environment and, therefore, it is flexible. The organization can be considered with margin rate beginning to low up to zero value as an organization with an insufficient level of flexibility that is at the “zone of crisis” and it is characterized by the depletion of reserved funds and reduction of current assets. Loss-maker is nonflexible and the presence of loss means that the organization has an evident sign of crisis and it can be bankrupt.

Биографии авторов

Olga Gennadevna Rybakova, Industrial University of Tyumen

PhD in Cultural Studies, Associate Professor, Industrial University of Tyumen (2/P, Lenina St., Nizhnevartovsk, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Area — Yugra, 628600, Russian Federation; e-mail: olgryb@gmail.com).

Irina Anatolyevna Kislukhina, Industrial University of Tyumen

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Department of Humanities and Economics and Natural Sciences, Industrial University of Tyumen (2/P, Lenina St., Nizhnevartovsk, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Area — Yugra, 628600, Russian Federation; e-mail: irina_for@mail.ru).

Библиографические ссылки

Fedotov, A. I. (Ed.). (1989). Gibkieproizvodstvennye sistemy sborki [Flexibleproduction assembly systems]. Leningrad: Engineering. Leningradskoye otdelenie Publ., 349.

Lishchinsky, A. L. (Ed.). Gibkieproizvodstvennyye sistemy Yaponii [Flexibleproduction systems of Japan]. Trans. from Japanese. Moscow: Mashinostroenie Publ., 232.

Ansoff, I. (1989). Strategicheskoe upravlenie [Strategical management]. Short translation from English. Moscow: Ekonomika Publ., 519.

Tompson, A. A. & Striklend, A. J. (1998). Strategicheskiy menedzhment: iskusstvo razrabotki i realizatsii strategii [Crafting & Executing Strategy: The Quest for Competitive Advantage]. Trans. from English. Moscow: Banki i birzhi Publ.; YuNITI Publ., 576.

Elbing, A. O. (1974). On the Applicability of Environmental Models. N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 283.

Sheffi, Y. (2006). Zhiznestoykoye predpriyatie: kak povysit nadyozhnost tsepochki postavok i sokhranit konkurentnoye preimushchestvo [Viable company: how to improve the reliability of supply chains and to keep the competitive position]. Trans. from English. Moscow: Alpina Business Books Publ., 301.

Byk, F. L. & Kitushin, V. G. (2007). Ponyatiynye aspekty novoy paradigmy upravleniya [Conceptual aspects of new management paradigm]. Menedzhment vRossii i za rubezhom [Management in Russia and abroad], 5, 3-8.

Druker, P. F. (2000). Zadachi menedzhmenta vXXI veke [Theproblems of management it the 21st century]. Trans. from English. Moscow: Wiliams Publ., 272.

Klok, K. & Goldsmit, J. (2004). Konets menedzhmenta i stanovlenie organizatsionnoy demokratii [The end of management and formation of organizational democracy]. St. Petersburg: Piter Publ., 368.

Kovi, S. R. (2008). Liderstvo, osnovannoye na printsipakh [The leadership based on rules]. Trans. from English by P. Samsonov. Moscow: Alpina Business Books Publ., 312.

Sergeev, A. L. (2005). Instituty upravlencheskoy paradigmy[The institutions of management paradigm]. Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom [Management in Russia and abroad], 2, 55-66.

Pfeling, N. (200). Upravlenie na osnove gibkikh tseley. Vne byudzhetirovaniya: kak prevzoyti konkurentov v XXI veke [Management on the ground of flexible objectives. Out of budgeting: how to outperform competitor in the 21st century]. Trans. from German by a. Druzenko. Moscow: Belyy gorod Publ., 280.

Biryukov, P. A. & Kuzmina, M. V. (2000). Problema adaptatsii lesozagotovitelnykh predpriyatiy v rynochnoy srede [The problem of adaptation of wood cutting companies in market environment]. Lesnoy zhurnal [Forest journal], 5-6, 62-65.

Gurkov, I. B. (1997). Adaptatsiya promyshlennoy firmy: teoriya i praktika [Adaptation of an industrial firm: theory and practice]. Moscow: VShE Publ., 134.

Marshev, V. I. & Ayvazyan, Z. S. (1996). O strategii vyzhivaniya rossiyskikh predpriyatiy v perekhodnyy period (Opyt upravlencheskogo konsultirovaniya) [About Russian business enterprises survival strategy in economic rebound (the experience of management consulting)]. Moscow: Dialog-MGU Publ., 51.

Gurkov, I. B. (1994). Strategii adaptatsii promyshlennykh predpriyatiy [The adaptation strategies of industrial enterprises]. Rossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal [Russian economics journal], 2, 3-11.

Nabiulina, E. S. (1993). Predpriyatiya v usloviyakh reformy: novyye modeli povedeniya [Business enterprises in the conditions of market reform: new behaviour model]. Moscow: Ekspertnyy institut RSPP Publ., 48.

Risin, I. E. (1996). Upravlenie predpriyatiem v reformiruemoy ekonomike Rossii [Enterprise management in reformed Russian economics]. Voronezh: VGU Publ., 109.

Dolgopyatova, T. (1996). Perekhodnaya model povedeniya rossiyskikh promyshlennykh predpriyatiy [Enterprise management in reformed Russian economics]. Voprosy ekonomiki [Question of economy], 11, 119-130.

Vasilyev, V. N. & Sadovskaya, T. G. (1988). Organizatsionno-ekonomicheskie osnovy gibkogo proizvodstva [Organizational and economical grounds of flexible production]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola Publ., 272.

Samochkin, V. N. (2000). Gibkoye razvitiepredpriyatiya: analiz iplanirovanie [Flexible development of an organization: analysis and planning]. 2-nd ed., corrected and added. Moscow: Delo Publ., 376.

Whellen, T. & Hunger, D. (1992). Strategic Management & Business Policy [Strategic management & business policy]. N.Y.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., 326.

Zhdanov, S. A. (2001). Etalony normalnogo i krizisnogo funktsionirovaniya predpriyatiy [Samples of standard and crisis enterprises performance]. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 216

Загрузки

Опубликован

2016-12-28

Как цитировать

Rybakova, O. G., & Kislukhina, I. A. (2016). Estimation of Flexibility of an Organization on the Ground of the Calculation of Profit Margin Rate. Экономика региона, 12(4), 1253–1262. https://doi.org/10.17059/2016-4-25

Выпуск

Раздел

Исследовательские статьи