Testing Kuznets’ Hypothesis for Russian Regions: Trends and Interpretations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2016-2-20Keywords:
inequality of income distribution, economic growth, Gini coefficient, competitiveness of regions, regression modeling, gross regional product, income, post-crisis period, regional policy, poverty reductionAbstract
The paper established a number of "stylized facts", one of which is a confirmation of the S. Kuznets’ hypothesis of the nonlinear dependence between the degree of inequality in income distribution and welfare economic systems on the example of a group of Russian regions for the period 2002-2012. It is shown that, for a given sample, the welfare and economic growth factors amplify their influence on inequality in income distribution in the post-crisis period. The monotonous growth of income inequality which was observed before the crisis of 2008 is slowing in the process of raising the per capita gross regional product (GRP) during the post-crisis period, and for the foreseeable future, in some regions, its direction can be reversed, while maintaining a trend of socio-economic development. Despite the persistence over time of a convex nature of S. Kuznets’ curve for Russian regional data, its parameters changed during the reporting 2002-2012 period. The maximum point of the curve shifts to the left, its convexity increases. These facts indicate that the income inequality growth of the Russian regions’ as a result of growth of per capita GRP is slowing. For some regions in the post-crisis period, the income inequality does not grow with the growth of per capita GRP, or it even reduces. This fact can be attributed to the implementation of the Russian federal socially oriented projects and programs in recent years. The results can be used for the development of regional economic policy in order to regulate the level of income distribution inequality in the regions of Russia.References
Barro, R. J. (2000). Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries. Journal of Economic Growth, 5(1), 5-32.
Barro, R. J. (1996). Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study (No. w5698). National Bureau of Economic Research, 118.
Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1-28.
Anand, S. & Kanbur, S. R. (1993). The Kuznets Process and the Inequality -Development Relationship. Journal of Development Economics, 40(1), 25-52.
Anand, S. & Kanbur, S. R. (1993). Inequality and Development. A critique. Journal of Development Economics, 41(1), 19-43.
Ahluwalia, M. S. (1976). Inequality, Poverty and Development. Journal of Development Economics, 3(4), 307-342.
Ahluwalia, M. S. (1976). Income Distribution and Development: Some Stylized Facts. The American Economic Review, 128-135.
Ceriani, L. & Verme, P. (2012). The Origins of the Gini Index: Extracts from Variabilité e Mutabilité (1912) by Corrado Gini. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 10(3), 421-443.
Gini, C. (1912). Variabilita e Mutabilita, Contributo Allo Studio Delle Distribuzioni: Relazione Statische. Studi Economico-Giuridici Della R. Universita Di Cagliari.
Papanek, G. F. & Kyn, O. (1986). The Effect on Income Distribution of Development, the Growth Rate and Economic Strategy. Journal of Development Economics, 23(1), 55-65.
Huang, H.-C. R. (2004). A Flexible Nonlinear Inference to the Kuznets Hypothesis. Economics Letters, 84(2), 289296.
Litvintseva, G. P., Voronkova, O. V. & Stukalenko, E. A. (2007). Regionalnoye neravenstvo dokhodov i uroven bed-nosti naseleniya Rossii: analiz s uchetom pokupatelnoy sposobnosti rublya [Regional inequality of the income and level of poverty of the population of Russia: the analysis taking into account purchasing power of ruble]. Problemy prognozirovaniya [Problems of Forecasting], 6, 119-131.
Cowell, F. A. (2000). Measurement of Inequality. Handbook of Income Distribution. Atkinson A. B., Bourguignon F., 87-166.
Li, H., Xie, D. & Zou H.-f. (2000). Dynamics of Income Distribution. Canadian Journal of Economics, 937-961.
Ram, R. (1988). Economic Development and Income Inequality: Further Evidence on the U-Curve Hypothesis. World Development, 16(11), 1371-1376.
MacDonald, R. & Majeed, M. T. (2010). Distributional and Consequences of Globalization: A Dynamic Comparative Analysis for Developing Countries.
Panizza, U. (2002). Income Inequality and Economic Growth: Evidence from American Data. Journal of Economic Growth, 7(1), 25-41.
Rooth, D. O. & Stenberg, A. (2012). The Shape of the Income Distribution and Economic Growth-Evidence from Swedish Labor Market Regions. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 59(2), 196-223.
Williamson, J. G. (1991). British Inequality During the Industrial Revolution: Accounting for the Kuznets Curve. Income Distribution in Historical Perspective. Brenner Y. S. et al. Cambridge University Press, 261.
Partridge, M. D. (1997). Is Inequality Harmful for Growth? Comment. The American Economic Review, 1019-1032.
List, J. A. & Gallet, C. A. (1999). The Kuznets Curve: What Happens After the Inverted-U? Review of Development Economics, 3(2), 200-206.
Tribble, R. (1996). The Kuznets-Lewis Process within the Context of Race and Class in the US Economy. International Advances in Economic Research, 2(2), 151-164.
Tribble, R. (1999). A Restatement of the S-Curve Hypothesis. Review of Development Economics, 3(2), 207-214.
Mushinski, D. W. (2001). Using Non-Parametrics to Inform Parametric Tests of Kuznets' Hypothesis. Applied Economics Letters, 8(2), 77-79.
Amos, O. M. (1988). Unbalanced Regional Growth and Regional Income Inequality in The Latter Stages of Development. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 18(4), 549-566.
Ram, R. (1991). Kuznets's Inverted-U Hypothesis: Evidence from a Highly Developed Country. Southern Economic Journal, 1112-1123.
Ram, R. (1993). Kuznets's Inverted-U Hypothesis: Reply. Southern Economic Journal, 528-532.
Fosu, A. K. (1993). Kuznets's Inverted-U Hypothesis: Comment. Southern Economic Journal, 523-527.
Hsing, Y. & Smyth, D. J. (1994). Kuznets's Inverted-U Hypothesis Revisited. Applied Economics Letters, 1(7), 111-113.
Levernier, W., Rickman, D. S. & Partridge, M. D. (1995). Variation in US State Income Inequality: 1960-1990. International Regional Science Review,18(3), 355-378.
Jacobsen, P. W. & Giles, D. E. (1998). Income Distribution in the United States: Kuznets' Inverted-U Hypothesis and Data Non-Stationarity. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 7(4), 405-423.
Gallet, C. A. & Gallet, R. M. (2004). US Growth and Income Inequality: Evidence of Racial Differences. The Social Science Journal, 41(1), 43-51.
Ohtani, K., Kakimoto, S. & Abe, K. (1990). A Gradual Switching Regression Model with a Flexible Transition Path. Economics Letters, 32(1), 43-48.
Naghshpour, S. (2005). The Cyclical Nature of Family Income Distribution in the United States: An Empirical Note. Journal of Economics and Finance, 29(1), 138-143.
Kim, D. H., Huang, H. C. & Lin, S. C. (2011). Kuznets Hypothesis in a Panel of States. Contemporary Economic Policy, 29(2), 250-260.
Pesaran, M. H. & Smith, R. (1995). Estimating Long-Run Relationships from Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 79-113.
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled Mean Group Estimation of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(466), 621-634.
Dincer, O. C. & Gunalp, B. (2012). Corruption and Income Inequality in the United States. Contemporary Economic Policy, 30(2), 283-292.
Arellano, M. & Bover, O. (1995). Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-Components Models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29-51.
Blundell, R. & Bond, S. (1998). Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143.
Huang, H.-C. R., Fang, W., Miller, S. M. & Yeh, C.-C. (2015). The Effect of Growth Volatility on Income Inequality. Economic Modelling, 45, 212-222.
Byrne, J. P. & Davis, E. P. (2005). Investment and Uncertainty in the G7. Review of World Economics, 141(1), 1-32.
Byrne, J. P. & Philip Davis, E. (2005). The Impact of Short-and Long-run Exchange Rate Uncertainty on Investment: A Panel Study of Industrial Countries. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 67(3), 307-329.
Ratnikova, T. & Furmanov, K. (2010). Ekonomicheskiy rost i neravenstvo dokhodov v regionakh Rossii: proverka gipotezy Kuznetsa [Economic growth and inequality of the income in regions of Russia: test of the Kuznets hypothesis]. Sistemnoye modelirovanie sotsialno-ekonomicheskikh protsessov. Mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya shkola-seminar imeni akademika S. S. Shatalina [System modelling of socio-economic processes. International scientific workshop named after the Academician S. S. Shatalin]. Zvenigorod: Voronezh State University Publ., 275-276.
Demidova, O. A. (2008). Proverka gipotezy S. Kuznetsa dlya rossiyskikh regionov [Test of the Kuznets hypothesis for the Russian regions]. Obozrenie prikladnoy i promyshlennoy matematiki [Review of applied and industrial mathematics], 15(4), 664-666.
Shevyakov, A. Yu. & Kiruta, A. Ya. (2009). Neravenstvo, ekonomicheskiy rost i demografiya: neissledovannye vzaimosvyazi [Inequality, economic growth and demography: unexplored interrelations]. Moscow: M-Studio Publ., 192.
Malkina, M. Yu. (2014). Issledovanie vzaimosvyazi urovnya razvitiya i Stepeni neravenstva dokhodov v regionakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Research of interrelation of the level of development and degree of the income inequality in the regions of the Russian Federation]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 2, 238-248.
Glazyrina, I. P. & Klevakina, E. A. (2013). Ekonomicheskiy rost i neravenstvo po dokhodam v regionakh Rossii [Economic growth and inequality according to the income in the regions of Russia]. EKO. Vserossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal [ECO. All-Russian economic journal], 11(473), 113-128.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 James R. Alm, Ruslan Arkadievich Grigoryev, Marat Vladimirovich Kramin, Timur Vladimirovich Kramin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
