The Impact of the Russian Environmental Policy on Regional Investments in Environmental Protection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-1-15Keywords:
environmental protection, environmental policy instruments, industry specialization of regions, regional investments, environmental expenditures, investments in fixed assets, charges for emission limits, charges for exceeding emission levels, expenditures on eco-control, interbudgetary transfersAbstract
The implementation of the sustainable development determines economic growth while reducing the negative impact on the environment. To achieve this, investments in environmental protection are required, which should be stimulated by the national environmental policy. The article aimes at assessing the impact of environmental policy instruments (charges for emission limits, charges for exceeding emission limits, fines, costs for eco-control, interbudgetary transfers, mandatory environmental insurance, regional tax incentives) on the development of regional investments in environmental protection in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation based on Federal State Statistics Service data. The research methods are panel regressions with fixed and random effects, the typology of regions by industry specialization based on the values of the localization coefficients, various types of analysis (structural, groupings). Our findings demonstrate that the Russian environmental policy contributed to a slight increase in current environmental expenditures in the regions, primarily agricultural ones, but did not stimulate an increase in environmental investments in fixed assets. As a result, environmental quality indicators did not improve in the majority of Russian regions. Eco-control costs (in industrial regions), and charges for emission limits (in industrial and agro-industrial regions) have the greatest incentive to increase environmental costs. Fines, interbudgetary transfers, mandatory environmental insurance, regional tax incentives do not have a significant impact on environmental investment in fixed assets in Russian regions. To improve the efficiency of the state environmental policy the authors propose to increase the charge for exceeding emission limits and fines for environmental law violation, to revise the target nature of interbudgetary transfers in terms of stimulating environmental investments in fixed assets, and to implement pilot projects to introduce environmental policy instruments that comply with best international practices.
References
Chepurnykh, N. V., Novoselov, A. L. & Merzlov, A. V. (2006). Regionalnoe razvitie: selskaya mestnost [Regional development: rural area]. Moscow: Nauka, 383. (In Russ.)
Clark, T. S. & Linzer, D. A. (2015). Should I use fixed or random effects? Political Science Research and Methods, 3(2), 399–408.
Doonan, J., Lanoie, P. & Laplante, B. (2005). Determinants of environmental performance in the Canadian pulp and paper industry: An assessment from inside the industry. Ecological Economics, 55(1), 73–84.
Druzhinin, P. V., Shkiperova, G. T. & Potasheva, O. V. (2019). Issledovanie vzaimosvyazi ekologicheskikh i ekonomicheskikh pokazateley: modelirovanie i analiz raschetov [Study of the relationship between environmental and economic indicators: modeling and analysis of calculations]. Institute of Economics, Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Petrozavodsk: KarRC RAS, 126. (In Russ.)
Elie, L., Granier, C. & Rigot, S. (2021). The different types of renewable energy finance: A Bibliometric analysis. Energy Economics, 93. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104997.
Howlett, M., Perl, A. & Ramesh, M. (2009). Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 308.
Ilyin, V. A., Shabunova, A. A., Gulin, K. A. & Mao. D. (Eds.) (2017). Ekonomicheskoe razvitie regionov: opyt Rossii i Kitaya [Economic development of the regions: experience of Russia and China]. Vologda: Institute of Socio-Economic Development of Territories of RAS, 400. (In Russ.)
Iraldo, F., Testa, F., Melis, M. & Frey, M. A. (2011). Literature Review on the Links between Environmental Regulation and Competitiveness. Environmental Policy and Governance, 21, 210–222.
Kemp, R. P. M. (1995). Environmental Policy and Technical Change: A Comparison of the Technological Impact of Policy Instruments. Maastricht: Universitaire Pers Maastricht, 318.
Kortelainen, M. (2008). Dynamic environmental performance analysis: A Malmquist index approach. Ecological Economics, 64(4), 701–715.
Kravchenko, A. A. & Zayats, A. V. (2019). The relationship of economic development and environmental problems in modern China. Aziatsko-tikhookeanskiy region: ekonomika, politika, pravo [Pacific Rim: Economics, Politics, Law], 2, 40–50. (In Russ.)
Kuosmanen, T. & Kortelainen, M. (2005). Measuring Eco-efficiency of Production with Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(4), 59–72.
Kuosmanen, T. & Kuosmanen, N. (2009). How not to measure sustainable value (and how one might). Ecological Economics, 69(2), 235–243.
Liang, Z., Zhang, M., Mao, Q., Yu, B., & Ma, B. (2018). Improvement of Eco-Efficiency in China: A Comparison of Mandatory and Hybrid Environmental Policy Instruments. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15, 1473. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15071473
Mirzekhanova, Z. G. (2020). Implementing the Green Economy Concepts in the Russian Far East: Environmental Preconditions. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 16(2), 449-463. (In Russ.)
Myakshin, V. N. (2013). Strategiya gosudarstvennogo upravleniya strukturnymi preobrazovaniyami v ekonomike regiona: monografiya [The strategy of state management of structural transformations in the regional economy: monograph]. Arkhangelsk: IPC NArFU, 241. (In Russ.)
Okhrimenko, A. I. & Troitskaya, L. I. (2018). Otsenka proektnykh resheniy v ispolzovanii zemelnykh resursov i obespechenii ekologicheskoy bezopasnosti regiona [Assessment of design solutions in the use of land resources and ensuring the environmental safety of the region: monograph]. Irkutsk: BSU Publishing House, 110. (In Russ.)
Rykova, I. N. & Yurieva, A. A. (2020). Analysis of the effectiveness of state support in the field of nature management and environmental protection: foreign and Russian experience. Vestnik Instituta druzhby narodov Kavkaza [Bulletin of the Institute of Friendship of the Peoples of the Caucasus], 3(55), 59-70. (In Russ.)
Semyachkov, A. I., Gao, R. & Atamanova, E. A. (2021). Management of Regional Natural Resources based on the Variability of Environmental and Economic Indicators. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 17(2), 520-537. DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-2-12. (In Russ.)
Shershunov, V. A. & Zenyakin, V. E. (2006). Problemy natsionalnogo i regionalnogo razvitiya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Problems of national and regional development in the Russian Federation]. Moscow: Algorithm-B, 158. (In Russ.)
Sulakshin, S. S. (Ed.). (2008). Gosudarstvennaya ekonomicheskaya politika i Ekonomicheskaya doktrina Rossii. K umnoy i nravstvennoy ekonomike: v 5 tomakh. Tom 2 [State economic policy and Economic doctrine of Russia. Towards a smart and moral economy: monograph: in 5 volumes. Vol. 2]. Center for Problem Analysis and Public Administration Design. Moscow: Scientific expert, 1883. (In Russ.)
Val’ko, D. V. (2018). An event-oriented approach to the assessment of the quality of public administration of the regional socio-ecological-economic system of the Chelyabinsk oblast. Regionalnaya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika [Regional economics: theory and practice], 16(7), 1284-1302. DOI: 10.24891 / re. 16.7.1284. (In Russ.)
Verzhitsky, D. G. & Starchenko, E. N. (2016). Usloviya razvitiya rynochnykh institutov ekologizatsii ekonomiki regiona [Conditions for the development of market institutions for the greening of the region’s economy]. Moscow: RUSAYNS, 129. (In Russ.)
World Bank. (1998). Five Years after Rio: Innovations in Environmental Policy. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, 53. DOI: 10.1596/0-8213-3957-5
Zemtsov, S., Barinova, V., Kidyaeva, V. & Lanshina, T. (2020). Ecological efficiency and sustainable regional development in Russia during the 20 years of resource-based growth. Ekonomicheskaya politika [Economic policy], 15(2), 18–47. (In Russ.)
