Organizational and Economic Forms and Effective Methods of State Regulation of Agriculture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2015-2-22Keywords:
multistructurality, agriculture, organizational and economic form, state regulation, personal subsidiary farmAbstract
The multistructurality and variety of organizational and economic forms of business pattern in agriculture are reasonably related and presented in the form of the individual and private, collective, state, and also mixed business. The individual and private type of small rural business is country farms and those personal farms, which have commodity or partially commodity character. Collective business in agro-industrial sector of the Republic of Bashkortostan is conducted on the basis of collective-share and cooperative property. All republic agricultural organizations belong to cattle breeding, cattle breeding grain, and grain cattle breeding types, at various combinations of other industries, traditional for the republic as additional. The cattle breeding of milk and meat direction is characterized for all zones of the Republic. Different organizational and economic forms of enterprises have various level of efficiency. The existing experience confirms higher efficiency of large-scale enterprises in comparison to small-scale that is determined by the economic law of production concentration (density, scale), that is economy of scale. There are also distinctions in indicators of farm efficiency. The purpose of the work is the proposal development on creation of the effective agriculture support mechanism. In preparing the study, the methods of statistical data analysis, material analysis of reports of some farms for 2006-2013, also their inspections, indicators of budget performance of the Republic, SWOT analysis of the institutional potential assessment of the internal and external factors influencing the agro-industrial complex strategy development are used. Scope of the results: system of state regulation and support of agro-industrial complex taking into account the business patterns existing in agriculture. Conclusions and main results of the analysis: 1. At the present time, various ways in agriculture, at the right choice of specialization are not competitive to each other, therefore, have the equal rights for the state support. 2. The choice of business pattern has to be carried out by each site of agricultural production independently, at own risk. 3. Structurization of functions of various level public authorities and municipal self-government in regulation of agricultural production is required.
References
Lenin, V. I. (1962). O «levom» rebyachestve i o melkoburzhuaznosti [Childishness and petty-bourgeois mentality]. Lenin V. I. Poln. sobr. soch. T. 36. Mart-iyul 1918 g. [Complete set of works. Vol. 36. 1918]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat, 296-741.
Lenin, V. I. (1963). O prodovolstvennom naloge [On a food tax]. Poln. sobr. soch. T. 43. Mart — iyul 1921 g. [Complete set of works. Vol. 43. March — July 1921]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat, 561.
Miloserdov, V. V. (1992). Agrarnyy vopros. Chemu uchit amerikanskiy opyt [Agrarian question. What we learn from the American experience]. APK. Ekonomika, upravlenie [Agro-industrial complex. Economics, management], 3, 20-29.
Suslov, I. F. & Suslova, Ye. I. (2001). Mnogoukladnost v strategii razvitiya agrarnogo sektora Rossii [Muitistructural character in the Russia agrarian sector strategy development]. Ros. akad. gos. sluzhby pri Prezidente Ros. Federatsii [The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation]. Moscow: RAGS Publ.
Trasy, M. (1995). Selskoye khozyaystvo i prodovolstvie v ekonomike razvitiykh stran. Vvedenie v teoriyu, praktiku i politiku: per s angl. [Food and Agriculture in a Market Economy: An Introduction to Theory, Practice and Policy: trans. in English]. St. Petersburg: Economic school, 431.
Kovalchuk, Yu. (1997). Eonomiko-matematicheskie modeli optimizatsii razmerov zhivotnovodcheskikh ferm i ispolzovanie ikh dlya otsenki variantov reformirovaniya APK [Economic-mathematical optimization models of the sizes of livestock farms and their use for estimation of options of reforming of agro-industrial complex]. Mezhdunarodnyy selskokhozyaystvennyy zhurnal [International agricultural journal], 3, 48-49.
Kolesnikov, A. V. (2010). Razvitie krupnotovarnogo selskokhozyaystvennogo proizvodstva Rossii. Teoriya, metodologiya, praktika: avtoref. ... dis. ... d-ra ekon. nauk [Development of Russia large marketable agricultural production. Theory, methodology, practice: published summery of a Doctoral thesis]. Moscow.
Sistema vedeniya agropromyshlennogo proizvodstva v Respublike Bashkortostan [System of conducting agro-industrial production in the Republic of Bashkortostan]. Ufa: Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Bashkortostan, Gilem, 528.
Galiev, T. A. (2004). Agrarnaya politika i ekonomika. Federalnyy i regionalnyy aspekty [Agrarian policy and economics. Federal and regional aspects]. Ufa, 292.
Institutsionalnyye osnovy modernizatsii APK regiona [Institutional modernization bases of region agro-industrial complex]. Na primere Respubliki Bashkortostan [On the example of the Republic of Bashkortostan]. Gataullin, R. F., Nusratullin, V. K., Gizatullin, Kh. N., Askarov, A. A., Garipov, F. N., Khuzhakhmetova, G. N., Yarkov, N. V.; ISEI UNTs RAN [Institute for Social and Economic Research, Ufa Scientific Center, Russian Academy of Sciences]; Edited by Doctor of Economics, prof. Gaynanov, D. A. Ufa, 200.
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting. New York; London: Free Press, 450.
Nort, D. (1997). Instituty, institutsionalnyye izmeneniya i funktsionirovanie ekonomiki [Institutes, institutional changes and operation of economy]. Moscow: Fond ekonomichesko knigi «Nachalo» [Fund of the economic book of «Beginning»], 180.
Ovchinnikov, O. G. (1999). Gosudarstvennoye regulirovanoie agrarnogo sektora SshA [State regulation of the USA agrarian sector]. Moscow: DeLI, 663.
Nusratullin, V. K., Musin, B. M., Nasratullin, I. V. & Farrakhova, F. F. (2012). Sovershenstvovanie ekonomicheskoy otsenki zemel selskokhozyaystvennogo naznacheniya [Improvement of economic appraisal of land of agricultural purpose]. Ufa: Gimlem, 168.
Deininger, K. (2005). Zemelnaya politika v tselyakh razvitiya i sokrashcheniya bednosti: per. s angl. [Land policy for growth and poverty reduction: trans. from English]. Moscow: Ves Mir, 334.
Tatarkin, A. I. (2014). Dialektika gosudarstvennogo i rynochnogo regulirovaniya sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regionov i munitsipalitetov [Dialectics of the state and market regulation of socio-economic development of regions and municipalities]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 1(37), 9-33.
Hayman, D. N. (1992). Sovremennaya mikroekonomika: analiz i primenenie: per. s angl.; v 2-kh t. T. 1. [Modern microeconomics: analysis and application: trans. from English; in 2 vol, vol. 1]. Moscow: Finances and Statistics, 384.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 R.F. Gataullin, A.A. Askarov, G.N. Khuzhakhmetova, N.V. Yarkov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
