Food Supply Security and Import Substitution as the Key Strategic Objectives of the Modern Agricultural Policy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2015-3-21Keywords:
agricultural policy, price disparity, Eurasian Economic Union, import substitution, competitiveness and competitive advantages, food supply security and independenceAbstract
A crucially new social- and economic situation has shaped up by now in the rural areas and agricultural sphere; in its many instances such situation does not fit in the national agricultural policy in effect called upon to be a long-term instrument for economic adjustment of the agro-food market and state support of the agricultural sphere, most significantly, its foundation - the farming sector. Ensuring of food supply security by import substitution in the age of the national farm product markets globalization is possible in the macro-economic conditions promoting the development of the agricultural sector. The main reason that retards this sector development is inequitable cross-sector exchange at sacrifice of the agricultural industry. The article sets forward and approbates the author's method of simple assessment procedure of how the price cross-sector relations and state financial support (in the form of subsidies) of the agricultural enterprises influence their profitability generation. Further to the assessment, the following conclusions have been made: - in view of the tangible contribution of the agricultural sector to the country economy, this sector is self-reliant for its own development, i.e. the state is reasonably in a position to increase expenses for eliminating negative consequences of inequitable crosssector exchange; - the amount of expenses for state financial support is supposed to enable the agricultural commodity producers to generate profitability to the level that can stimulate the farm workers' labour efficiency and build up a system of affordable credit facilities for the objects of techno-engineering modernization necessary to produce competitive products. - the issue of improving the competitiveness of agricultural production should be addressed in the first place at the federal level. Among the essential factors to increase the competitiveness of specific types of domestic food products and agricultural raw materials, one should consider the implementation of theoretically sustained agreements on the agricultural policy in EEU countries. The article considers the guidelines to form the common agricultural policy in the new integrated entity.References
Gosudarstvennaya programma razvitiya selskogo khozyaystva i regulirovaniya rynkov selskokhozyaystvennoy produktsii, syrya i prodovolstviya na 2013-2020 gody [State development program for agriculture and regulation of the markets of agricultural production, raw materials and food for 2013-2020]. Moscow: FGBNU Rosinformagrotekh Publ., 204.
Gumerov, R. (2010). Obespechenie prodovolstvennoy bezopasnosti strany. Udalsya li doktrinalnyy dokument? [Ensuring the food security of the country. Whether the doctrinal document was successful?]. Rossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal [Russian economic journal], 2, 11-22.
Ovchinnikov, O. G. (2015). Opyt SShA i tekushchie zadachi razvitiya agrarnogo sektora Rossii [The USA experience and the current problems of development of the Russian agrarian sector]. Ekonomika selskokhozyaystvennykh i pererabatyvayushchikh predpriyatiy [Economy of agricultural and processing enterprises], 2, 48-50.
Buzdalov, I. (2010). Rossiyskoye krestyanstvo pod pressom «perekachki» [The Russian peasantry under a press of "transfer"]. Obshchestvo i ekonomika [Society and economics], 2, 73-86.
Bespakhotnyy, G. V. (2015). Zadachi gosudarstvennogo planirovaniya APK i metody ikh resheniya [Problems of governmental planning of agro-industrial complex and methods for solution]. Ekonomika selskogo khozyaystva Rossii [Agrarian economics of Russia], 5, 2-7.
Serkov, A.F. (2014). Agrarnaya politika: vyzovy i perspektiva [Agrarian policy: challenges and prospect]. Ekonomika selskokhozyaystvennykh i pererabatyvayushchikh predpriyatiy [Economy of agricultural and processing enterprises], 12, 2-6.
Kizhlay, G. M. & Rogoleva, N. S. (2014). Trudovyye resursy i ekonomicheskaya effektivnost ikh ispolzovaniya v selskom khozyaystve [Manpower and economic efficiency of its use in agriculture]. Agrarnyy vestnik Urala [The agrarian bulletin of Ural], 7, 88-93.
Golubev, A. V. (2015). Razvitie APK na osnove otechestvennykh innovatsiy kak uslovie importozameshcheniya [Development of agro-industrial complex on the basis of national innovations as a condition for import substitution]. Ekonomika selskokhozyaystvennykh i pererabatyvayushchikh predpriyatiy [Economy of agricultural and processing enterprises], 2, 42-47.
Aganbegyan, A. G. & Porfiryev, B. N. (2015). Zameshchenie importa prodovolstviya i razvitie «zelyonoy» agroekonomiki kak strategicheskie otvety na antirossiyskie sektoralnye sanktsii [Food import substitution of food products and development of "green" agro-economy as the strategic answers to the anti-Russian sectoral sanctions]. Ekonomika selskokhozyaystvennykh i pererabatyvayushchikh predpriyatiy [Economy of agricultural and processing enterprises], 2, 16-27.
Porter, M. (2006). Konkurentsiya [The competition]. Moscow: Williams Publ., 608.
Robinson, J. Ekonomicheskaya teoriya nesovershennoy konkurentsii [Economic theory of the imperfect competition]. Moscow: Ekonomika Publ., 390.
Skakun, A. S. (2013). Prioritetnyye napravleniya po povysheniyu effektivnosti i konkurentosposobnosti agropromyshlennogo kompleksa [The priority directions on increase of efficiency and competitiveness in agro-industrial sector]. Vesti NAN Belarusi [Bulletin of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus], 1, 23–31.
Uilmson O. I. Ekonomicheskie instituty kapitalizma: firmy, rynki, otnoshencheskaya kontraktatsiya [Economic institutes of capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting]. St. Petersburg: Lenizdat Publ., 702.
Kholden, R. K. (2001). Strategiya i taktika tsenoobrazovaniya [Strategy and tactics of pricing]. St. Petersburg: Piter Publ., 404.
Gelvanovskiy, M. (2005). Chto takoye konkurentosposobnost? [What is the competitiveness?]. Voprosy ekonomiki perekhodnogo perioda [Questions of economics of transition], 7, 3-25.
Gimadi, I. E., Drokin, V. V. & Zhuravlev, A. S. (2006). Razmeshchenie i spetsializatsiya selskokhozyaystvennogo proizvodstva v industrialnom regione. Ispolzovanie konkurentnykh preimushchestv, gosudarstvennoye regulirovanie [Placement and specialization of agricultural production in the industrial region. Use of competitive advantages, state regulation]. Ekaterinburg: Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS Publ., 209.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 A.I. Altukhov, V.V. Drokin, A.S. Zhuravlev

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

