Regional Healthcare Effectiveness

Authors

  • Olga Vladimirovna Kudelina Siberian State Medical University
  • Sofya Leonidovna Eremina National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University; Siberian State Medical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17059/2016-1-16

Keywords:

regional healthcare, effectiveness of healthcare, availability of health resources, use of health resources, availability of medical care, medical care, performance indicators, healthcare expenditures, Minmax method

Abstract

An evaluation of healthcare systems effectiveness of the regions of the Russian Federation (federal districts) was conducted using the Minmax method based on the data available at the United Interdepartmental Statistical Information System. Four groups of components (i.e. availability of resources; use of resources; access to resources and medical effectiveness) decomposed into 17 items were analyzed. The resource availability was measured by four indicators, including the provision of doctors, nurses, hospital beds; agencies providing health care to the population. Use of resources was measured by seven indicators: the average hospital stay, days; the average bed occupancy, days; the number of operations per 1 physician surgical; the cost per unit volume of medical care: in outpatient clinics, day hospitals, inpatient and emergency care. Access to the resources was measured by three indicators: the satisfaction of the population by medical care; the capacity of outpatient clinics; the average number of visits to health facility. The medical effectiveness was also measured by three indicators: incidence with the "first-ever diagnosis of malignancy"; life expectancy at birth, years; the number of days of temporary disability. The study of the dynamics of the components and indexes for 2008-2012 allows to indicate a multidirectional influence on the regional healthcare system. In some federal districts (e.g. North Caucasian), the effectiveness decreases due to resource availability, in others (South, North Caucasian) - due to the use of resources, in others (Far Eastern, Ural) - due to access to resources. It is found that the effectiveness of the healthcare systems of the federal districts differs significantly. In addition, the built matrix proves the variability the of effectiveness (comparison of expenditures and results) of healthcare systems of the federal districts of the Russian Federation: the high results can be obtained at high costs (the Far Eastern federal district) as well as at low costs (the Volga federal district). There is no possibility of reaching average results under any expenditures level (i.e. neither high, nor low, nor average). The proposed method of evaluation may become a basis for the creation of the strategic development programs of regional healthcare and the modeling of various scenarios for its realization while reaching the stable balance.

Author Biographies

Olga Vladimirovna Kudelina, Siberian State Medical University

PhD in Medicine, Associate Professor, Health Care and Public Health Department, Siberian State Medical University (2, Moskovsky Highway, Tomsk, 634050, Russian Federation; e-mail: feuzozz@yandex.ru).

Sofya Leonidovna Eremina, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University; Siberian State Medical University

Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Professor of Engineering Entrepreneurship Department, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University; Head of the Department of Economics, Politology, Sociology and Law, Siberian State Medical University (2, Moskovsky Highway; 30 Lenina Ave., Tomsk, 634050, Russian Federation; e-mail: esofia@tpu.ru).

References

Tatarkin, A. I. (2014). Dialektika gosudarstvennogo i rynochnogo regulirovaniya sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regionov i munitsipalitetov [Dialectics of public and market regulation of the socio-economic development of regions and municipalities]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 1, 9–33.

Chereshnev, V. A., Verzilin, D. N., Maksimova, T. G. & Verzilin S. D. (2013). Ekologizatsiya i sotsioekonomicheskoye razvitie regionov. Otsenka regionalnoy differentsiatsii [Environmental and socio-economic development of regions: evaluation of regional differentiation]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 1, 33–46.

Kalashnikov, K. N., Shabunova, A. A. & Duganov, M. D. (2012). Organizatsionno-ekonomicheskie faktory upravleniya regionalnoy sistemoy zdravookhraneniya [Organizationaland economic factors of the regional health system management]. Vologda: ISERT RAN Publ., 153.

Puti, vedushchie k otsenke deyatelnosti sistemy zdravookhraneniya. Rukovodstvo po provedeniyu otsenki deyatelnosti sistemy zdravookhraneniya na natsionalnom ili territorialnom urovne [Pathways to health system performance assessment. A manual to conducting health system performance assessment at national or sub-national level]. Kopengagen: Phoenix Design Publ., 106.

Health at a Glance 2013: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing, 213.

Nadeem, E. & Walker, M. (2008). How Good Is Canadian Healthcare? 2008 Report: An International Comparison of Healthcare Systems. Vancouver: Fraser Institute, 122.

Rovere, M. & Skinner, B. J. (2012). Value for Money from Health Insurance Systems in Canada and the OECD. Fraser Alert, 4, 1–18.

Eremina, S. & Kudelina, O. (2014). Effektivnost zdravookhraneniya. Regionalnyy aspekt [Efficiency of health care. Regional aspect]. Obshchestvo i ekonomika [Society and economics], 4, 141–157.

Eremina, S. L. & Kudelina, O. V. (2014). Mirovoy opyt otsenki effektivnosti zdravookhraneniya [World experience of health system performance assessment]. EKO [ECO], 10, 133–145.

Krivenko, N. V. (2013). Sistema upravleniya organizatsionno-ekonomicheskimi izmeneniya v sfere zdravookhraneniya [Management system of organizational and economic changes in health services]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 1, 149–157.

Otsenka deyatelnosti sistem zdravookhraneniya. Instrument strategicheskogo rukovodstva zdravookhraneniem v XXI veke [Health systems performance assessment. A tool for health governance in the 21st century]. Kopengagen: Evropeyskoye regionalnoye byuro VOZ Publ., 20.

Tchouaket, E. N., Lamarche, P. A., Goulet, L., Contandriopoulos, A. P. (2012). Healthcare System Performance of 27 OECD countries. International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 27(2), 104–129.

Kelly, E. & Hurst, J. (2006). Healthcare Quality Indicators Project: Conceptual Framework Paper. OECD Health Working Papers, 23(3), 8–12.

Gwartney, J., Lawson, R. & Hall, J. (2012). Economic Freedom of the World: 2012. Annual Report. Vancouver: Fraser Institute, 322.

Barua, B. (2013). Provincial Healthcare Index 2013. Studies in Health Policy, 1, 4–20.

Starodubov, V. I., Shchepin, O. P. et al. (Eds). Obshchestvennoye zdorovye i zdravookhranenie. Natsionalnoye rukovodstvo [Public health and health system. National leadership]. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media Publ., 624.

Nechaev, V. S. (2011). Strategicheskiy menedzhment v zdravookhranenii i vyzovy globalizatsii [Strategic management in the health system and challenges of globalisation]. Menedzhment kachestva v sfere zdravookhraneniya i sotsialnogo razvitiya [Quality management in health system and social development], 4(10), 19–22.

Levitsky, S. R. (2013). Integrating Law and Health Policy. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 9, 33–50.

Rosenberg, L. (2012). Is Healthcare Leaders Ready for the Real Revolution? The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 39(3), 215–219.

Downloads

Published

21.03.2016

How to Cite

Kudelina, O. V., & Eremina, S. L. (2016). Regional Healthcare Effectiveness. Economy of Regions, 12(1), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.17059/2016-1-16

Issue

Section

Research articles