Institutional Analysis of Knowledge Generation Resource Potential at the Enterprises of Regional Military-Industrial Complex
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2016-3-19Keywords:
institutional economics, knowledge generation, innovation, methodological tools, military-industrial complex, public enterprises, resource potential, institutional spiral, product life cycle, state orderAbstract
The article is devoted to the processes of knowledge generation at the enterprises of military-industrial complex, which are the leaders of the regional innovative activity. The target of the research is to develop the methodology based on the use of resource application potential for increasing the efficiency of knowledge generation at the instrument-making enterprises of military-industrial complex. The system analysis of the knowledge generation processes is conducted at one of them. It allows to draw a conclusion that such enterprises have a lack of the institutes of knowledge generation processes. The authors are offered a technique of the development of the knowledge generation system at the military-industrial enterprises based on the accounting of assets and opportunities of the enterprise in the realization of intellectual activity. The developed technique is based on the determination of the horizontal resource potential of knowledge generation and allows to determine the potential of resource application at each stage of product life cycle. The comparison of the actual and theoretical values of horizontal resource potential allows to correct the distribution of a share of each of resources within a stage, and therefore, to optimize the realization of tasks at a specific stage. The offered tools were implemented in 2015 at one of the regional military-industrial enterprises. The methodological tools of the research include the methods of expert assessment, mathematical statistics and the institutional analysis. On the basis of the offered technique and received empirical results, the institutional spiral of knowledge generation during the fiiling of state order at the military-industrial enterprise is developed. Its implementation will promote the decrease in the level of uncertainty during the whole life cycle of innovative activity product. The developed institutional spiral of knowledge generation at instrument-making military-industrial enterprises assumes the stimulation of knowledge generation processes at each of the stages of product life cycle. The results of this research can be used for the creation of the knowledge generation scheme as well as for the use of the efficiency increase mechanism of the knowledge generation processes at the enterprises of military-industrial complex.References
Dyatlov, S. A. & Selishcheva, T. A. (2009). Oboronno-promyshlennyy kompleks Rossii kak osnova dlya innovatsionnogo razvitiya ekonomiki strany [Military-industrial complex of Russia as basis for innovative development of national economy]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Omsk University], 4, 6–20. (Series: Economics).
Saakyan, A. M. (2012). Stimulirovanie innovatsionnoy deyatelnosti predpriyatiy OPK. Printsipy i instrumenty vybora form [Stimulation of innovative activity of military-industrial enterprises: principles and tools of a choice of forms]. Sovremennyye tekhnologii upravleniya [Modern technologies of management], 16, 32–37.
Kuzmenko, M. A. (2008). Teoreticheskie osobennosti organizatsii intellektualnoy deyatelnosti, napravlennoy na sozdanie korporativnogo intellektualnogo kapitala v OPK [Theoretical features of the organization of the intellectual activity directed on creation of the corporate intellectual capital in military-industrial complex]. Izvestiya Irkutskoy gosudarstvennoy akademii [News of Irkutsk State Academy], 5, 34–36.
Esaulov, V. N. (2012). 20 let raboty predpriyatiy OPK v rynochnoy ekonomike [20 years of the work of military-industrial enterprises in the market economy]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Tomsk State University], 3(19), 11–18.
Karavaev, I. E. (2012). Sushchnost i osobennosti innovatsionnogo razvitiya predpriyatiy oboronno-promyshlennogo kompleksa v sovremennykh usloviyakh [The essence and features of innovative development of the enterprises of military-industrial complex in modern conditions]. Rossiyskoye predprinimatelstvo [Russian entrepreneurship], 13(211), 82–87.
Makarov, V. L. (2003). Ekonomika znaniy. Uroki dlya Rossii [Economy of knowledge: lessons for Russia]. Vestnik RAN [Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 73(5), 450–456.
Kleyner, G. B. (2005). Stanovlenie obshchestva znaniy v Rossii. Sotsialno-ekonomicheskie aspekty [Development of the society of knowledge in Russia: social and economic aspects]. Obshchestvennyye nauki i sovremennost [Social sciences and the present], 3, 56–69.
Bogomolov, O. T. (2000). Rossiyskoy normoy dolzhna stat sotsialno-orientirovannaya rynochnaya ekonomika [Socially-focused market economy should become the Russian standard]. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii [Economic science of modern Russia], 5, 37–40.
Bagrinovskiy, K. A. & Isaeva, M. K. (2002). Bazovaya model mekhanizma upravleniya tekhnologicheskim razvitiem [Basic model of the management mechanism for technological development]. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii [Economic science of modern Russia], 3, 31–39.
Makarov, V. L. & Kleyner, G. B. (2007). Mikroekonomika znaniy [Microeconomics of knowledge]. Moscow: Ekonomika Publ., 204.
Schumpeter, J. (1947). Captialism, Socialism and Democracy (2nd ed.). London: Allen and Unwin, 431.
Loury, G. C. (1979). Market Structure and Innovation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93(3), 395–410.
Lee, T. & Wilde, L. L. (1980). Market Structure and Innovation: A Reformulation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94(2), 429–436.
Sah, R. & Stiglitz, J. (1987). The Invariance of Market Innovation to the Number of Firms. The RAND Journal of Economics, 18(1), 98–108.
Delbono, V. & Denicolo, V. (1991). Incentives to Innovate in a Cournot Oligopoly. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(3), 951–961.
García-Manjón, J. V. & Romero-Merino, M. E. (2012). Research, Development, and Firm Growth. Empirical Evidence from European top R&D Spending Firms. Research Policy, 41, 1084–1092.
Dasgupta, P. & Maskin, E. (1987). The Simple Economics of Research Portfolios. The Economic Journal, 97(387), 581–595.
Harison, E. & Koski, H. (2009). Applying Open Innovation in Business Strategies: Evidence from Finnish Software Firms. Research Policy, 39, 351–359.
Dahlander, L. & Gann, D. M. (2010). How Open is Innovation? Research Policy, 39, 699–709.
Ferrary, M. (2011). Specialized Organizations and Ambidextrous Clusters in the Open Innovation Paradigm. European Management Journal, 29, 181–192.
Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In: Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 646 (619–625).
Reinganum, J. F. (1983). Uncertain Innovation and the Persistence of Monopoly. The American Economic Review, 73(4), 741–748.
Teece, D. (2010). Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(1), 172–194.
Festel, G. (2014). Reasons for Corporate Research and Development Spin-Outs — The Chemical and Pharmaceutical Industry as Example. R&D Management, 44, 398–408.
Scotchmer, S. (1991). Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 29–41.
Denicolo, V. (2000). Two-Stage Patent Races and Patent Policy. Rand Journal of Economics, 31, 488–501.
O’Donoghue, T, Scotchmer, S. & Thisse, J. (1998). Patent Breadth, Patent Life, and the Pace of Technological Improvement. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 7, 1–32.
Hunt, R. (2004). Patentability, Industry Structure, and Innovation. Journal of Industrial Economics, 52(3), 401–425.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375–387.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Leaning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.
Bierly, P. & Chakrabarti, A. (1996). Generic Knowledge Strategies in the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Winter Special Issue), 123–135.
Hamel, G. & Prahaland, C. K. (1994). Competing for the Future. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. MA, 20.
Nekipelov, A. D., Tatarkin, A. I. & Popov, E. V. (2011). Imperativy sovremennoy ekonomicheskoy teorii [Imperatives of the modern economic theory]. Vestnik RAN [Belletin of RAS], 81(2), 169–174.
Padalkin, V. Yu. & Vorontsova, E. I. (2012). Ispolzovanie metodov analiza finansovykh rezultatov dlya otsenki ustoychivogo razvitiya ekonomiki predpriyatiy OPK [The use of the methods of the analysis of financial results for the assessment of a sustainable development of the business economics of military-industrial complex]. Teoriya i tekhnika radiosvyazi [Theory and equipment of radio communication], 4, 119–123.
Batkovskiy, A. M., Trofimets, V. Ya. & Trofimets, E. N. (2014). Razvitie metodicheskogo apparata reytingovoy otsenki finansovo-ekonomicheskogo sostoyaniya predpriyatiy oboronno-promyshlennogo kompleksa. [Development of the rating assessment method for the financial and economic condition of the enterprises of military-industrial complex]. Finansy i kredit [Finances and credit], 48(624), 34–45.
Shashkarova, M. V. (2015). Otsenka effektivnosti realizatsii innovatsionnykh proektov na predpriyatiyakh oboronnopromyshlennogo kompleksa [Efficiency evaluation of the implementation of innovative projects at the military-industrial enterprises]. Innovatsii i investitsii [Innovations and investments], 5, 10–13.
Namitulina, A. Z. & Kalashnikova, O. V. (2015). Osobennosti formirovaniya i ispolneniya federalnogo byudzheta v sfere oboronno-promyshlennogo kompleksa Rossii [Specifics of development and administration of the federal budget in the sphere of military-industrial complex of Russia]. MIR. Modernizatsiya. Innovatsii. Razvitie [MIR. Modernization. Innovation. Development], Vol. 6, 2(22), 43–49.
Popov, E. V., Vlasov, M. V. & Shishkina, A. Yu. (2014). Prioritety generatsii znaniy na gosudarstvennykh predpriyatiyakh [Priorities of knowledge generation at the state enterprises]. Natsionalnyye interesy. Prioritety i bezopasnost [National interests: priorities and safety], 26, 2–11.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 E.V. Popov, M.V. Vlasov, A. Yu. Shishkina, A.V. Yakimova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
