Convergence of Russian Regions: Different Patterns for Poor, Middle and Rich
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-4-8Keywords:
Russian regions, convergence, conditional convergence, gross regional product, economic growth, spatial-econometrics models, spatial effects, poor regions, rich regions, economic growthAbstract
The Strategy of Spatial Development of the Russian Federation until 2025 aims at the economic growth acceleration and reduction of the intra-regional socio-economic differences. Therefore, the factors affecting the economic growth of regions, convergence of regions, spillover effects from the neighbouring regions are of importance. Russian regions are very different and do not converge to a unique equilibrium path. 80 Russian regions were divided into the groups of poor, middle and rich regions. Three main hypotheses were considered, based on the differences in the 1) convergence speed, 2) influence of the same factors, 3) different mutual influence of regions. They were tested using a modified spatially autoregressive model for the three groups using the Russian regional data for 2000–2017. Beta-convergence was found only for the middle and rich regions, the rate of convergence was higher in the rich regions. The poor regions did not grow faster than the other regions, confirming the relevance of the Strategy of Spatial Development. The similarities and differences were identified in the factors ensuring the economic growth of regions belonging to the three groups. The growth in all regions is stimulated by the regional economy openness. The growth of rich regions can be achieved by increasing the investment and reducing the investment risk. However, the investments in the poor and middle regions are not effective. The poor and middle regions receive positive spillovers from the growth of the neighbouring regions. It is possible to expect reduced differences in the living standards between the poor and rich regions.
References
Solanko, L. (2008). Unequal fortunes: a note on income convergence across Russian regions. Post-Communist Economies, 20(3), 287–301. DOI: 10.1080/14631370802281399.
Gluschenko, K. P. (2012). Myths about beta-convergence. William Davidson Institution Working Paper no. 1040, 21.
Kholodilin, K. A., Oshchepkov, A. & Siliverstovs, B. (2012). The Russian regional convergence process: Where is it leading? Eastern European Economics, 50(3), 5–26. DOI: 10.2753/EEE0012–8775500301.
Vakulenko, E. (2015). Analysis of the relationship between regional labour markets in Russia using Okun’s model. Prikladnaya ekonometrika [Applied Econometrics], 40(4), 28–48 (In Russ.).
Guriev, S. & Vakulenko, E. (2012). Convergence between Russian Regions. Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR) no. w0180, 82.
Berkowitz, D. & DeJong, D. N. (2005). Entrepreneurship and Post-socialist Growth. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 67, 25–46.
Berkowitz, D. & DeJong, D. N. (2011). Growth in post-Soviet Russia: A tale of two transitions. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 79(1–2), 133–143.
Leonard, C. S., Nazarov, Z. & Vakulenko, E. S. (2016). The impact of sub-national institutions. Economics of Transition, 24(3), 421–446. DOI: 10.1111/ecot.12095.
Alexeev, M. & Chernyavskiy, A. (2015). Taxation of natural resources and economic growth in Russia’s regions. Economic Systems, 39(2), 317–338. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2014.10.007.
Libman, A. (2013). Natural resources and sub-national economic performance: Does sub-national democracy matter? Energy Economics, 37, 82–99. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2013.02.003.
Vainberg, A. & Rybnikova T. (2006). Institutsionalnye i Geograficheskie Faktory Razvitiya Regionov Rossii [Institutional and Geographic Factors of Development of Russian Regions]. Mimeo. Retrieved from: http://data.cemi.rssi.ru/isepweb/anal/geofact.htm (Date of access: 10.12.2021) (In Russ.)
Elhorst, J. P. (2014). Spatial econometrics. From Cross–Sectional Data to Spatial Panels. Series: Springer Briefs in Regional Science, 119. DOI: 10.1007/978–3-642–40340–8.
Buccellato, T. (2007). Convergence across Russian regions: a spatial econometrics approach. UCL, Economics Working Paper 72, 27.
Lugovoy, O., Dashkeyev, V., Mazayev, I., Fomchenko, D., Polyakov. E. & Hecht, A. (2007). Analysis of Economic Growth in Regions: Geographical and Institutional Aspect. Consortium for Economic Policy Research and Advice. Moscow: IET, 130.
Kolomak, E. (2011). Spatial Externalities as a Source of Economic Growth. Regional Research of Russia, 2(1), 114–119). Moscow: Springer.
Bufetova, A. N. (2017). Trends in the concentration of economic activity and disparities in Russia’s spatial development. Regional Research of Russia, 7(2), 120–126. DOI: 10.1134/S2079970517020022
Zubarevich, N. V. & Gorina, E. A. (2015). Sotsialnye raskhody v Rossii: federalnyy i regionalnyy byudzhety [Social expenditures in Russia: federal and regional budgets]. Moscow: Higher School of Economics, 62. (In Russ.)
Barro, R. J. & Sala-i-Martin, X. I. (2004). Economic growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 625.
Doppelhofer, G. & Miller, R. I. (2004). Determinants of long-term growth: A Bayesian averaging of classical estimates (BACE) approach. American economic review, 94(4), 813–835.
Spence, M., Annez, P. C. & Buckley, R. M. (Eds.). (2009). Urbanization and Growth: Commission on Growth and Development. World Bank, 255.
Turok, I. & McGranahan, G. (2013). Urbanization and economic growth: the arguments and evidence for Africa and Asia. Environment and Urbanization, 25(2), 465–482. DOI: 10.1177/0956247813490908.
Chen, M., Zhang, H., Liu, W. & Zhang, W. (2014). The global pattern of urbanization and economic growth: evidence from the last three decades. PloS ONE, 9(8), e103799. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103799.
Castells-Quintana, D. (2017). Malthus living in a slum: Urban concentration, infrastructure and economic growth. Journal of Urban Economics, 98, 158–173. DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2016.02.003.
Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94.
Nwaogu, U. G. (2012). Essays on spatial analysis of foreign direct investment and economic growth determinants in developing countries. Western Michigan University, 135.
Huang, H. & Wei, Y. D. (2016). Spatial inequality of foreign direct investment in China: Institutional change, agglomeration economies, and market access. Applied Geography, 69, 99–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.12.014.
Harrison, A. (1996). Openness and growth: A time-series, cross-country analysis for developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 48(2), 419–447.
Sachs, J. D., Warner, A., Aslund, A. & Fischer, S. (1995). Economic reform and the process of global integration. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 26(1), 1–118.
Yanikkaya, H. (2003). Trade openness and economic growth: a cross-country empirical investigation. Journal of Development economics, 72(1), 57–89. DOI: 10.1016/S0304–3878(03)00068–3.
Wacziarg, R. & Welch, K. H. (2008). Trade liberalization and growth: New evidence. The World Bank Economic Review, 22(2), 187–231. DOI: 10.1093/wber/lhn007.
Huchet-Bourdon, M., Le Mouël, C. & Vijil, M. (2018). The relationship between trade openness and economic growth: Some new insights on the openness measurement issue. The World Economy, 41(1), 59–76. DOI: 10.1111/twec.12586.
Barro, R. J. & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of political Economy, 100(2), 223–251.
Ivanova, V. I. (2017). Spatial Convergence of Real Wages in Russian Cities. The Annals of Regional Science, 61(1), 1–30. DOI: 10.1007/s00168–017–0855–0.
Kadochnikov, S. M. & Fedyunina, A. (2018). Explaining The Performance of Russian Export: What Role Does the Hard and Soft Infrastructure Play? International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, 11(6), 541–559. DOI: 10.1504/IJEPEE.2018.095930.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Economy of Regions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
