Impact of Deficit Financing and Trade Openness on Private Consumption in India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-4-25Keywords:
ARDL, consumption expenditure, deficit financing, Ricardian equivalence, trade openness, fiscal policy, fiscal deficit, IndiaAbstract
The Ricardian equivalence hypothesis claims that private consumption is neutral to the fiscal deficit and its mode of financing (debt vs tax). The study reinvestigates the Ricardian equivalence hypothesis in India by taking private consumption as the dependent variable, whereas government expenditure, government debt, tax, domestic income, and trade are considered as independent variables. In the Indian context, the Ricardian view raises an interesting point. If the Ricardian equivalence holds in the Indian economy, households alter their spending patterns and consequently increase their savings, making the policy changes ineffective. The autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) bound testing approach was applied to the annual time series data from 1988 to 2021. The estimates confirm a significant long-run and short-run relationship between the variables; the results reject the Ricardian Equivalence and propound the Keynesian approach that the mode of financing the fiscal deficit (debt vs tax) does matter to the private consumption expenditure. The estimates also assert the long-run relation between trade openness and private consumption spending. The positive and significant coefficient shows that an open economy leads to an increase in consumption, which indirectly supports the Compensation Hypothesis. Given that deficit financing and trade openness have a substantial influence on India’s consumer spending, it can be concluded that expansionary fiscal and liberal trade policies should be carefully devised and supported. This study contributes to the existing literature on the Ricardian equivalence and trade openness by presenting new evidence on designing sustainable fiscal policy by spending wisely without imperilling the country’s consumption expenditure and global presence.
References
Acquah, H. de-G. (2010). Comparison of Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) in selection of an asymmetric price relationship. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 2 (1), 1–6.
Badaik, S., & Panda, P. K. (2022). Ricardian equivalence, Feldstein–Horioka puzzle and twin deficit hypothesis in Indian context: An empirical study. Journal of Public Affairs, 22 (1). https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2346
Banday, U. J., & Aneja, R. (2019). Ricardian Equivalence: Empirical Evidences From China. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 46 (1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00927678.2019.1639003
Banerjee, A., Dolado, J. J., & Mestre, R. (1998). Error-correction mechanism tests for cointegration in a single-equation framework. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 19 (3), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9892.00091
Barro, R. J. (1976). Perceived Wealth in Bonds and Social Security and the Ricardian Equivalence Theorem: Reply to Feldstein and Buchanan. Journal of Political Economy, 84 (2), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1086/260437
Barth, J. R., Iden, G., & Russek, F. S. (1986). Government debt, government spending, and private sector behavior: Comment. The American Economic Review, 76 (5), 1158–1167.
Benarroch, M., & Pandey, M. (2008). Trade openness and government size. Economics Letters, 101 (3), 157–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2008.06.016
Benarroch, M., & Pandey, M. (2012). The relationship between trade openness and government size: Does disaggregating government expenditure matter? Journal of Macroeconomics, 34 (1), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2011.11.002
Bernheim, B. D., & Bagwell, K. (1988). Is Everything Neutral? Journal of Political Economy, 96 (2), 308–338. https://doi.org/10.1086/261538
Buiter, W. H., & Patel, U. R. (1992). Debt, deficits, and inflation: An application to the public finances of India. Journal of Public Economics, 47 (2), 171–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(92)90047-J
Buiter, W. H., & Tobin, J. (1978). Debt neutrality: A brief review of doctrine and evidence. Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers, 731.
Butkus, M., Cibulskiene, D., Garsviene, L., & Seputiene, J. (2021a). The Heterogeneous Public Debt–Growth Relationship: The Role of the Expenditure Multiplier. Sustainability, 13 (9), 4602. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094602
Butkus, M., Cibulskiene, D., Garsviene, L., & Seputiene, J. (2021b). Empirical Evidence on Factors Conditioning the Turning Point of the Public Debt–Growth Relationship. Economies, 9 (4), 191. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9040191
Diamond, P. A. (1965). National debt in a neoclassical growth model. The American Economic Review, 55 (5), 1126–1150.
Dixit, V. (2014). Relation between Trade Openness, Capital Openness and Government Size in India. Foreign Trade Review, 49 (1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0015732513515987
Elmendorf, D. W., & Mankiw, N. G. (1999). Government debt. In: Handbook of macroeconomics. Vol. 1 (pp. 1615–1669). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0048(99)10038-7
Evans, P. (1988). Are Consumers Ricardian? Evidence for the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 96 (5), 983–1004. https://doi.org/10.1086/261572
Feldstein, M. (1982). Government deficits and aggregate demand. Journal of Monetary Economics, 9 (1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(82)90047-2
Feldstein, M., & Elmendorf, D. W. (1990). Government debt, government spending, and private sector behavior revisited: comment. The American Economic Review, 80 (3), 589–599.
Ghatak, A., & Ghatak, S. (1996). Budgetary deficits and Ricardian equivalence: The case of India, 1950–1986. Journal of Public Economics, 60 (2), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(95)01551-5
Graham, F. C. (1995). Government debt, government spending, and private-sector behavior: comment. The American Economic Review, 85 (5), 1348–1356.
Graham, F. C., & Himarios, D. (1991). Fiscal Policy and Private Consumption: Instrumental Variables Tests of the “Consolidated Approach.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2 3(1), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.2307/1992763
Graham, F. C., & Himarios, D. (1996). Consumption, Wealth, And Finite Horizons: Tests Of Ricardian Equivalence. Economic Inquiry, 34 (3), 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1996.tb01395.x
Gu, Y., Guo, J., Liang, X., & Zhao, Y. (2022). Does the debt-growth link differ across private and public debt? Evidence from China. Economic Modelling, 114, 105930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.105930
Gupta, K. L. (1992). Ricardian equivalence and crowding out in Asia. Applied Economics, 24 (1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036849200000099
Hye, Q. M. A., & Lau, W.-Y. (2014). Trade Openness And Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence From India. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16 (1), 188–205. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2012.720587
Karras, G. (2003). Trade openness and economic growth can we estimate the precise effect? Applied Econometrics and International Development, 3 (1), 7–25.
Kaur, B., & Mukherjee, A. (2012). Threshold level of debt and public debt sustainability: The Indian experience. Reserve Bank of India Occasional Papers, 33 (1–2), 1–29.
Keho, Y. (2016). Impact of Budget Deficit on Private Consumption inWAEMU Countries: Evidence from Pooled Mean Group Estimation. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 8 (3), 189-195. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v8n3p189
Kormendi, R. C. (1983). Government debt, government spending, and private sector behavior. The American Economic Review, 73 (5), 994–1010.
Kormendi, R. C., & Meguire, P. G. (1995). Government debt, government spending, and private-sector behavior: Reply. The American Economic Review, 85 (5), 1357–1361.
Kumari, R., Shabbir, M. S., Saleem, S., Yahya Khan, G., Abbasi, B. A., & Lopez, L. B. (2023). An empirical analysis among foreign direct investment, trade openness and economic growth: evidence from the Indian economy. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 12 (1), 127–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-06-2020-0199
Kusairi, S., Maulina, V., & Margaretha, F. (2019). Public debt and private consumption in Asia Pacific countries: Is there evidence for Ricardian equivalence? Journal of International Studies, 12 (1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2019/12-1/3
Mehta, D. (2023). Impact of Trade and Capital Openness on the Government Size of Russia. R-Economy, 9 (2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2023.9.2.011
Mehta, D., & Mallikarjun, M. (2023). Impact of fiscal deficit and trade openness on current account deficit in India: new evidence on twin deficits hypothesis. EconomiA, 24 (2), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECON-07-2022-0091
Modigliani, F., & Sterling, A. (1986). Government debt, government spending and private sector behavior: comment. The American Economic Review, 76 (5), 1168–1179.
Modigliani, F., & Sterling, A. G. (1990). Government debt, government spending, and private sector behavior: a further comment. The American Economic Review, 80 (3), 600–603.
Mohanty, R. (2019). Does Fiscal Deficit Crowd Out Private Corporate Sector Investment In India? The Singapore Economic Review, 64 (05), 1201–1224. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590816500302
Mohanty, R. K., & Panda, S. (2020). How Does Public Debt Affect the Indian Macroeconomy? A Structural VAR Approach. Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 14 (3), 253–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973801020920092
Moore, M. J. (1987). The Irish consumption function and Ricardian equivalence. The Economic and Social Review, 19 (1), 43–60.
Munir, K., & Mumtaz, K. (2021). Dynamics of Twin Deficits, Ricardian Equivalence, and Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle in South Asian Countries. Studies of Applied Economics, 39 (8), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i8.4066
Nguea, M. (2020). Openness and Government Size in Sub-Saharan African countries. Economics Bulletin, 40 (4), 2669–2676.
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16 (3), 289–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616
Pickson, R. B., & Ofori-Abebrese, G. (2018). Ricardian Equivalence Hypothesis in the Sub-Sahara African Countries. Journal of Economic Integration, 33 (3), 466–487. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2018.33.3.466
Pradhan, K. (2016). Ricardian Approach to Fiscal Sustainability in India. Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 10 (4), 499–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973801016659799
Ramsey, F. P. (1928). A Mathematical Theory of Saving. The Economic Journal, 38 (152), 543-559. https://doi.org/10.2307/2224098
Rangarajan, C., & Srivastava, D. K. (2005). Fiscal Deficits and Government Debt: Implications for Growth and Stabilization. Economic and Political Weekly, 40, 2919-2934
Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments? Journal of Political Economy, 106 (5), 997–1032. https://doi.org/10.1086/250038
Sardoni, C. (2021). The public debt and the Ricardian equivalence: Some critical remarks. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 58, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2021.05.006
Seater, J. J., & Mariano, R. S. (1985). New tests of the life cycle and tax discounting hypotheses. Journal of Monetary Economics, 15 (2), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(85)90064-9
Singh, T. (2017). Ricardian equivalence and the public and private saving nexus in India. Applied Economics, 49 (36), 3579–3598. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1265072
Suhartoko, Y., Pratikto, A. P., & Kirana, I. (2022). Ricardian Equivalence in Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Trisakti, 2 (1), 167–198. https://doi.org/10.25105/jet.v2i1.13565
Yellen, J. L. (1989). Symposium on the Budget Deficit. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3 (2), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.3.2.17
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Мехта Дхьяни , Малликарджун М.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
