Regional Maternity Capital Programmes: Impact on Fertility in Russia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-4-10Keywords:
fertility, total fertility rate, maternity capital, regional maternity capital programmes, demographic policyAbstract
Despite an active demographic policy, the birth rate in Russia has been declining since 2015. Since 2007, federal maternity capital (FMC) programme has been implemented. In 2011, some Russian regions additionally introduced regional maternity capital (RMC). The paper aims to assess the impact of RMC on fertility in Russian regions. To this end, econometric models using panel data from the Federal State Statistics Service for 1996-2020 were utilised. A positive impact of regional maternity capital for a second child on fertility was revealed. The study demonstrated that this support measure is most effective in predominantly Orthodox regions, as well as in regions with a higher total fertility rate (more than 1.7). According to the analysis, it is necessary to raise RMC payments for a second child to the level of federal maternity capital, all other things being equal, in order to increase the average total fertility rate to 1.7. Fertility is negatively correlated with the average per capita income, housing costs, unemployment rate and preschool enrolment, as well as positively correlated with federal maternity capital and marriage rate. As a result, the state has to continue and improve maternity capital programmes for the purchase of housing for families with children, support them in the labour market, improve preschool infrastructure, and also to pursue a pro-natalist policy aimed at strengthening the family institution and preserving family values. Due to the specificity of data, an influence of regional maternity capital on changes in birth timing and purposes of the capital’s possible spending were not considered. Further research should focus on determining priority forms of providing regional maternity capital according to the intended use.
References
Archangelskiy, V. N. (2015). Assistance to families with children in Russia: an assessment of demographic efficiency. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], 3, 56-64. (In Russ.)
Becker, G. S. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In: G. S. Becker (Ed.), Demographic and economic change in developed countries (pp. 209–240). Princeton: Princeton university press.
Becker, G. S. (1981). A treatise on the Family: Enlarged Edition. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press, 424.
Breen, R. (1997). Risk, recommodification and stratification. Sociology, 31 (3), 473–489.
Butz, W. P., & Ward, M. P. (1979). The Emergence of Countercyclical U.S. Fertility. American Economic Review, 69 (3), 318–328.
Chen, D. L. (2011). Can Countries Reverse Fertility Decline? Evidence from Frances Marriage and Baby Bonuses, 1929-1981. International Tax and Public Finance, 18 (3), 253-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-010-9156-6
Cohen, A., Dehejia, R., & Romanov, D. (2013). Financial Incentives and Fertility. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95 (1), 1–20.
Davis, K. (1945). The World Demographic Transition. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 237 (1), 1-11.
Dickert-Conlin, S., & Chandra, A. (1999). Taxes and the Timing of Births. Journal of Political Economy, 107 (1), 161-177.
Driscoll, J., & Kraay, A. (1988). Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel Data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 80 (4), 549–560.
Gans, J., & Leigh, A. (2009). Born on the First of July: An (un) Natural Experiment in Birth Timing. Journal of Public Economics, 93 (1-2), 246-263.
Gonzalez, L. (2013). The Effect of a Universal Child Benefit on Conceptions, Abortions, and Early Maternal Labor Supply. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5 (3), 160–188.
Israeli, O. (2007). A Shapley-based decomposition of the R-square of a linear regression. Journal of Economic Inequality, 5 (2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-006-9036-6
Kazenin, K. (2021). Birth Rate in Russia in 2020: Regional Dynamics. Ekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii [Russian Economic Development], 28 (3), 50-54. (In Russ.)
Kazenin, K., & Kozlov, V. (2020). Regional measures of support for families with three and more children: An overview. Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsialnoy politiki [The Journal of Social Policy Studies], 18 (2), 191-206. https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2020-18-2-191-206 (In Russ.)
Lesthaeghe, R. (2014). The second demographic transition: A concise overview of its development. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111 (51), 18112–18115. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1420441111
Levkovskaya, N., Andryuschenko, O., & Svischeva, V. (2017). Peculiarities of realizing the right to maternity capital. Sotsium i vlast [Society and Power], 3 (65), 41–45. (In Russ.)
Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988). A Theory of Marriage Timing. American Journal of Sociology, 94 (3), 563–591. https://doi.org/10.1086/229030
Populyakh, Yu. G., Mamash, Ye. A., Oydup, T. M. (2009). Analysis of Correlation Between Total Birth Rate and Average Income per Person in Differend Federal Districts. Regionalnaya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika [Regional Economics: Theory and Practice], 7 (18), 44-51. (In Russ.)
Rybakovskiy, L. L. (2016). “Efficiency” as basic index for the state and trends in natality. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies], 4, 23–30. (In Russ.)
Rybakovsky, O. L., & Tayunova, O. A. (2018). Objectives of the Russian migration development. Narodonaselenie [Population], 21 (1), 22-30. (In Russ.)
Slonimczyk, F., & Yurko, A. (2014). Assessing the impact of the maternity capital policy in Russia. Labour Economics, 30, 265-281.
Sorvachev, I, & Yakovlev, E. (2020). Short- and Long-Run Effects of a Sizable Child Subsidy: Evidence from Russia. IZA Discussion Papers, 13019, 60.
Svistilnik, Ya. O. (2022). Research of the Impact of regional maternity capital in the regions of Russia. In: Materialy Aprelskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii molodykh issledovateley Novaya ekonomika, biznes i obshchestvo, 11 apr. — 19 maya 2022 g., g. Vladivostok [Materials of the April Scientific and Practical Conference of Young Scientists “New Economy, Business and Society” (April 11 — May 19, 2022, Vladivostok)] (p. 84-89). Vladivostok: Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation; Far Eastern Federal University; School of Economics and Management. (In Russ.)
Trynov, A. V., Kostina, S. N., & Bannykh, G. A. (2020). Examination of Socio-economic Determinants of Fertility based on the Regional Panel Data Analysis. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 16 (3), 807–819. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-3-10 (In Russ.)
Zakharov, S. (2012). What will be the birth rate in Russia? The second demographic transition and the change in the age pattern of fertility. Demoskop Weekly [Demoscope Weekly], 495-496. Retrieved from: https://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2012/0495/s_map.php (Date of access: 28.07.2022) (In Russ.)
Zhuravleva, T., & Gavrilova, Ya. (2017). Analysis of Fertility Determinants in Russia: What do RLMS Data Say? Ekonomicheskiy zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki [HSE Economic Journal], 21 (1), 145–187. (In Russ.)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Вакуленко Елена Сергеевна , Ивашина Наталья Викторовна , Свистильник Яна Олеговна
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
