Development of the Theory of Capitalist Crises: Political Economy Traditions and Modernity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2015-2-3Keywords:
economic crisis, causes of crisis, economic schools and crises, accumulation of capital, current crisis and political economyAbstract
The article discusses the development history of the theory of economic crises under capitalism conditions. The author believes that economic science is being developed in two directions. The first direction is represented by science schools that deny any objective grounds for crises of overproduction in the market economy and develop new models of crisis-free growth. The opposite direction is supported by science schools acknowledging the existence of objective causes of crises, which is of practical significance for development of effective anti-crisis measures. The study is summarized by the conclusion about actualization of the political economy approach to analysis of the recent global crisis and its consequences. Its implementation anticipates special attention to different versions of overaccumulation of capital which played a key role in the origin of crisis processes in the world economy.References
Sismondi, J. S. (1936). Novyye nachala politicheskoy ekonomii ili o bogatstve v ego otnoshenii k narodonaseleniyu . Moscow: Sotsekizdat.
Ricardo, D. (1955). Nachalo politicheskoy ekonomii i oblozheniya . Moscow: Gospolitizdat.
Smith, A. (1993). Issledovanie o prirode iprichinakh bogatstva narodov , B. 1-3. Moscow: Nauka.
Marx, K. (1961). Kapital . Vol. 3. Book III. Protsess kapitalisticheskogo proizvodstva, vzyatyy v tselom . K. Marx, F. Engels, works, 2d ed., vol. 25, P. I. Moscow: Politizdat, 265-405.
Leontiev, V.V (1990). Ekonomicheskie esse . Moscow: Politizdat, 102-103.
Mankiw, N.G. (2009). Makroekonomist kak uchyonyy i inzhener . Voprosy Ekonomiki , 5, 86-103.
Schumpeter, J. (2007). Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya. Kapitalizm, sotsializm, demokratiya . Moscow: Eksmo, 179.
Haberler, G. (2005). Protsvetanie i depressiya. Teoreticheskiy analiz tsiklicheskikh kolebaniy . Chelyabinsk: Sotsium, 474.
Varga, E.S. (1974). Ekonomicheskie krizisy . Moscow: Nauka, 504.
Mendelson, L. A. (1959-1964). Teoriya i istoriya ekonomicheskikh krizisov i tsiklov , B. 1-3. Moscow: Sotsialno-Ekonomicheskaya Literatura.
Ekonomicheskiy tsikl. Analiz avstriyskoy shkoly . (2005). Chelyabinsk: Sotsium, 78-159.
Mises, L. (1994). Liberalizm v klassicheskoy traditsii . Moscow: Nachala-Press, 87.
Friedman, M. (1998). Esli by dengi zagovorili . Moscow: Delo, 160.
Krugman, P. (2013). Vykhod is krizisa est! . Moscow: Azbuka Biznesa, 138.
Keynes, J. M. (1978). Obshchaya teoriya zanyatosti, protsenta i deneg . Moscow: Progress, 200-389.
Ryazanov, V. T. Ekonomicheskaya politika posle krizisa. Stanet li ona snova keynsianskoy? // Ekonomika Ukrainy. 2014. № 5, Р. 4-27.
Krugman, P. How Did Economists Get It So Wrong? Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/magazine/(date of access: 07.19.2014).
Skidelsky, R. (2011). Keyns. Vozvrashchenie mastera . Moscow: United Press, 208.
Ryazanov, V. T. Politicheskaya ekonomiya. Iz proshlogo v buduscheye // Gorizonty Economiki. 2012. № 2. Р. 81-98.
Brenner, R. (2014). Ekonomika globalnoy turbulentnosti: razvityye kapitalisticheskie ekonomiki ot dolgogo buma do dolgogo spade, 1945-2005 . Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 552.
Greenspan, A. (2010). Epokha potryaseniy. Problemy i perspektivy mirovoy finansovoy sistemy . Moscow: United Press, 479.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 V.T. Ryazanov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
