New Interaction Paradigm of Ecological, Social and Economic Structures of Human Activity

Authors

  • Natalya Yevgenyevna Buletova Volgograd Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation
  • Irina Valerievna Gorelova Volgograd Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation
  • Ada Vladimirovna Golomanchuk Volgograd Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation
  • Yelena Roaldovna Orlova Institute for System Analysis of the Russian Academy of Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17059/2015-2-5

Keywords:

paradigm of stationary economy, transformation of institutional matrix, priorities through parities, ecological literacy

Abstract

Realities of the XXI century demand searching and grounding measures on changing economic, political, and the main thing, ideological institutions that determine trends of evolution and managing vital human activity at national and over-national levels. Using synergetic approach, the authors made an attempt to synthesize conclusions and main theses of neo-institutionalism theory, onto-psychology, as well as results of biological evolution for determining the way to overcome global ecological crisis at nano-level and to form a model of the mankind's optimal evolution on the base of principle “priorities through parities”, using DNA-symbol as a code of survival, through co-evolution of economy and ecology. The main problem, existing even in economically developed countries, is the realization of the fact that the paradigm of the stationary economy is the only condition for the mankind's survival. To solve this problem serious transformation of ideological institutions is necessary, at the expense of comprehensive and based on onto-psychological methods program of ecological literacy, that should harmonically blend with the presented by the authors triads of state strategic management and achieving the goal of development. It is the transformation of the national matrix, content and direction of which are set in order to ensure a balance of interests of all participants in ecological and economic development, will lay the necessary rules, both formal and informal, in the style of human behavior, social groups, the national economy. Realization of the program ecological literacy within the national policy on ecological development of the regions is one of the most important conditions for a natural, not imposed from the outside, prepare to use the paradigm of a sustainable economy as the basis of economic, political and ideological institutions of modern society, which is primarily the formation of a new paradigm of human device - devices nano-level decision-making, consumer behavior.

Author Biographies

Natalya Yevgenyevna Buletova, Volgograd Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation

Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Accounting, Analysis and Audit, the Volgograd Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation (8, Gagarin St., 400131 Volgograd, Russia; e-mail: bdv1968@mail.ru).

Irina Valerievna Gorelova, Volgograd Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation

Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Accounting, Analysis and Audit, the Volgograd Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation (8, Gagarin St., 400131 Volgograd, Russia; e-mail: tonechka0606@yandex.ru).

Ada Vladimirovna Golomanchuk, Volgograd Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation

Doctor of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor of Constitutional and Administrative Law, the Volgograd Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation (8, Gagarin St., 400131 Volgograd, Russia; e-mail: golomanchukav@mail.ru).

Yelena Roaldovna Orlova, Institute for System Analysis of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Laboratory Chief of the Institute for System Analysis of the Russian Academy of Sciences (9, 60 let Oktiabria Av., 117312 Moscow, Russia; e-mail: orlova@isa.ru).

References

Akimova, T. A. (2013). Osnovy ekonomiki ustoychivogo razvitiya . Moscow, Economika Publ.

Kharitonov, A. S. (2002). Minimalnoye chislo parametrov, kharakhterizuyushchikh sotsialno-ekonomicheskoye razvitie re-gionov . Audit i finansovyy analiz , 1, 193-208.

Kirdina, S. G. (2004). X-i Y-ekonomiki: institutsianalnyy analiz . Moscow: Nauka.

Maslow, A. (1999). Motivatsiya i lichnost . Translated by A. M. Tatlybaeva. St. Petersburg: Eurasia Publ.

Kuznetsova, O. V. (2013). Piramida faktorov sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regionov . Voprosy ekonomiki , 2, 121-131.

Menegetti, A. (2007). Uchebnik po ontopsikhologii . Trans. from Italian by Non-commercial Non-state Charity Fund “Ontopsychology”. Moscow: Non-commercial Non-state Charity Fund “Ontopsychology”.

Ung, K. G. (1991). Arkhetip i simvol . Translated by V.V. Selenskiy. Moscow: Renaissance Paubl.

Varshavskiy, A. Ye. (2012). Etika, ekonomika i innovatsii . Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody , 1, 3-18.

Timofeyeva, G. V. (2012). Innovatsionno-insestitsionnyy mekhanizm razvitiya sotsialnoy sfery regiona . Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Ekonomika. Ekologiya , 1, 205-210.

North, D. (1981). Structure and Change in Economic history. N.-Y.: Norton.

North, D. & Thomas, R. (1973). The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History. Cambridge, Cambridge University Hress.

Polanyi, K. (2001). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. 2nd ed. Foreword by Joseph E. Stiglitz; introduction by Fred Block. Boston: Beacon Press, 317.

Bessonova, O. E. (2012). Institutsionalnaya matritsa dlya modernizatsii Rossii . Voprosy ekonomiki , 8, 122-144.

Khrustalyov, Ye. Yu. (2014). Intellektualnoye tekhnologicheskoye razvitie kak osnova ekonomicheskogo rosta . Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya , 11, 10-22.

Kleyner, G. B. (2013). Kakaya ekonomika nuzhna Rossii i dlya chego? (opyt sistemnogo issledovaniya) . Voprosy ekonomiki , 2, 4-5.

Orlova, N. R. & Buletova, N. Ye. (2014). Neprokhodyashchiy «kaskad bifurkatsiy» traektorii razvitiya rossiyskikh regionov: prichiny i posledstviya . Natsionalnyye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost , 20 (257), 24-38.

Downloads

Published

25.06.2015

How to Cite

Buletova, N. Y., Gorelova, I. V., Golomanchuk, A. V., & Orlova, Y. R. (2015). New Interaction Paradigm of Ecological, Social and Economic Structures of Human Activity . Economy of Regions, 11(2), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.17059/2015-2-5

Issue

Section

Research articles