Transformation of Young People's Attitude Toward Work in the Old Industrial Region: Ontogenetic Aspect

Authors

  • Boris Sergeyevich Pavlov Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17059/2015-3-12

Keywords:

young people, reproduction, employment potential, socialization, working education, family parent, child labor, health, leisure lifestyle, social deviation, consumerism

Abstract

The article emphasizes that for the countries facing the crisis of natural reproduction of human resources, the improvement of their quality is the only option for economic growth policy. According to the author's opinion, the Achilles heel of the modern system of the labor potential reproduction of society (at all its territorial and settlement levels), of the development and the utilization of human resources is a failure in the field of working education for Russian young generations at the stage of general education and professional socialization. Working activity for the developing child's personality is necessary, irreplaceable attribute of socialization. The article presents the idea that early adult students (students in the later years of high school or the early years of higher education) should participate in adequate socially useful work, which should not be limited only to the pedagogic issues. As the young people get older, not only the potential ability to work should grow. The author believes that child labor (and the following working education) in modern Russia is reduced to the rank of "outside the pedagogical law". On the basis of statistical data, the author demonstrates that the socio-economic behavior of the overwhelming majority of the early adult students of the Ural region are mainly geard toward a leisurely consumerist lifestyle. In particular, the attention is focused on the development and strengthening of the selfish behavior of students, ignoring the limited financial resources of their parents, sponsoring their studies at the institute of higher education. The particular attention is paid to the issues of the social and settlement assimilation of the young people in the Ural region. It is shown that the village youth learn the deviant subculture of urban youth, which has a significant impact on the process of destabilization of the basis of rural way of life. The findings and suggestions of the article are based on the results of a number of comprehensive sociological research conducted in 2003-2014 in urban and rural areas of the Ural region under the supervision and with the direct participation of the author.

Author Biography

Boris Sergeyevich Pavlov, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS

Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Leading Reseach Associate, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS (29, Moskovskaya St., Ekaterinburg, 620014, Russian Federation; e-mail: pavlov_boris@mail.ru).

References

Marx, K. & Engels, F. (1995). Sochineniya: 2-e izd [Works: 2nd ed.]. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo politicheskoy literatury Publ.

Luhmann, N. (1993). Risk: A Sociological Theory. N.Y.: Walter de Gruyter, Inc., 18.

Giddens, A. (1994). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity, 91.

Yanitskiy, O. N. (2013). Sotsialnyye dvizheniya: teoriya, praktika, perspektivy [Social movements: theory, practice, prospects]. Moscow: Novyy khronograf Publ., 360.

Lebedeva, L. F. & Emelyanov, E. V. (2010). Formirovanie trudovogo potentsiala v SShA [Development of labor potential in the USA]. Rossiya i Amerika v XXI veke [Russia and America in the 21st century], 1. Available at: http://www.rusus.ru/?act =read&id.

Ilinskiy, I. M. (2001). Molodezh i molodezhnaya politika. Filosofiya. Istoriya. Teoriya [The youth and youth policy. Philosophy. History. Theory]. Moscow: Golos Publ., 696.

Pavlov, B. S. (2014). Vosproizvodstvo chelovecheskogo potentsiala v regione. Teoreticheskie i metodicheskie aspekty sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo analiza. Na primere Urala [Reproduction of human potential in a region. Theoretical and methodical aspects of the socio-economic analysis. On the example of the Ural region]. Ekaterinburg: In-t ekonomiki UrO RAN Publ., 575.

Shatalova, N. I. (1999). Teoretiko-metodologicheskie problemy sotsiologicheskogo izucheniya trudovogo potentsiala rabotnika: avtoref. dis. d-ra sotsiol. nauk. [Theoretical and methodological issues of sociological studying of employee’s labour potential: published summary of a Doctoral thesis]. Ekaterinburg, 40.

Slutskiy, E. G. (Ed.). (2004). Yuvenologiya i yuvenalnaya politika v XXI veke. Opyt kompleksnogo mezhdistsiplinarnogo issledovaniya [Youth studies and juvenile policy in the 21st century. Experience of integrated interdisciplinary research]. St. Petersburg: Znanie Publ., 734.

Kislitsyna, O. A. (2011). Zdorovye detey — bogatstvo natsii. Tendentsii, faktory riska, strategii sberezheniya [The health of children is the wealth of the nation. Tendencies, risk factors, saving strategy]. Moscow: MAKS Press Publ., 268.

Pavlov, B. S. (2014). The Phenomenons of "Health" and "Physical Culture" in the Social Consciousness of Ural Youth. Eastern European Scientific Journal, 4, 40-44.

Ushinskiy, K. D. (1968). Izbrannyye pedagogicheskie proizvedeniya [Selected pedagogical works]. Moscow: Mysl Publ., 360.

Kogan, L. N. (1992). Sotsiologiya kultury [Sociology of culture]. Ekaterinburg: UrGU Publ., 120.

Fayzullin, F. S. & Yapparova, R. R. (2010). Sotsialnye razlichiya v kachestve zhizni naseleniya krupnogo goroda [Social differences in the quality of life of the population of the major city.]. Ufa: Gilem Publ., 156.

Yanitskiy, O. N. (2002). «Kriticheskiy sluchay». Sotsialnyy poryadok v "obshchestve riska" ["Critical case". A social order in "risk society"]. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie [Sociological review], 2(2), 85-98.

Ilinskiy, I. M. (2006). Molodezh i molodezhnaya politika. Filosofiya. Istoriya. Teoriya [The youth and youth policy. Philosophy. History. Theory]. Moscow: Golos Publ., 696.

Zborovskiy, G. E. (2013). Znanie i obrazovanie v sotsiologii. Teoriya i realnost [Knowledge and education in sociology. Theory and reality]. Ekaterinburg: Gumanitarnyy universitet Publ., 484.

Golovin, V. V. & Lurye, M. L. (2008). Ideologicheskie i territorialnyye soobshchestva molodezhi. Megapolis, provintsialnyy gorod, selo [Ideological and territorial communities of youth. Megalopolis, town, village]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie [Ethnographic review], 1, 56-70.

Velikiy, P. P. & Bocharova, E. V. (2012). Raskrestyanivanie kak indikator destruktivnoy transformatsii rossiyskoy agrosfery [Liberation of peasants as indicator of destructive transformation of the Russian agrosphere]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies], 1, 126-133.

Khagurov, A. A. (2012). Sotsiologiya rossiyskogo sela: monografiya: 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. [Sociology of the Russian village: monograph: 3rd revised and enlarged edition]. Moscow: IS RAN Publ., 390.

Published

21.09.2015

How to Cite

Pavlov, B. S. (2015). Transformation of Young People’s Attitude Toward Work in the Old Industrial Region: Ontogenetic Aspect. Economy of Regions, 11(3), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.17059/2015-3-12

Issue

Section

Research articles