Substantionation of the Transformation of the Priorities of Innovation and Technological Development of Russian Regions in the Global Crisis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2016-3-25Keywords:
innovative development, technological wave, global crisis, innovation policy, regional innovation strategy, high-tech sector, innovative business, neo-industrialization, modernization, import substitutionAbstract
The purpose of the study is the substantiation of the necessity to implement the policy of neo-industrialization in Russia as a tool for overcoming the consequences of the global crisis. The hypothesis of the study consists in the assumption that the increase of Russian regions’ competitiveness during the crisis is impossible without the transformation of regional innovation priorities with the account of the modern trends in science and technology development as well as the production needs in modernization and import substitution, rapidformation of the high-tech sector. The authors suggest that one of the main reasons for modern structural crisis in the Russian Federation is ignoring of the determined impact of the level of innovative-technological development on the status of regional socio-economic systems and the country as a whole. During the test of the hypothesis, on the basis of the analysis of official statistics, there are revealed a number of negative trends that hinder overcoming the crisis by the accelerated development of modern technological waves in Russia. They are the staff reduction in the Russian science and deterioration of its quality; the increasing gap between the financial support of the scientific research in the Russian Federation and in the developed countries; the reduction of the possibility for the development of innovative business; producers’ disincentive in the innovative activities. The authors substantiate the necessity to strengthen the state innovative policy for the improvement of the socio-economic situation in the Russian Federation. The research proposes the methodological approach to the selection of the priorities for the innovative support of the economic development of the Russian regions based on a comprehensive consideration of the status and problems of the development of scientific and innovative capacity, business environment of the region, as well as its ability to create the innovative production. The calculations to assess the possibility to form the innovative activity’s centres of different types in the Russian regions are made. These centres should be aimed at increasing the share of high-tech enterprises focused on the creation of innovations to solve the current problems for Russia such as import substitution and neo-industrialization of the economy. The article is addressed to the professionals in the field of theory and practice of the management of innovative processes.References
Lvov, D. S. (1990). Effektivnoye upravlenie tekhnicheskim razvitiem [Effective management of technical development]. Moscow: Ekonomika Publ., 176.
Abalkin, L. I. (1994). Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost Rossii: ugrozy i ikh otrazhenie [Economic security of Russia: threats and their reflection]. Voprosy ekonomiki [Questions of economy], 12, 4–13.
Glazyev, S. Yu. O strategii modernizatsii i razvitiya ekonomiki Rossii v usloviyakh globalnoy depressii [Modernization strategy and development of the Russian economy in a global depression]. Retrieved from: http://www.glazev.ru/econom_polit/269/ (date of access: 04.03.2016).
Yakovets, Yu. V. (2004). Epokhalnyye innovatsii XXI veka [Landmark innovations of the 21st century]. Moscow: Ekonomika Publ., 439.
Grinberg, R. S. (2010). Osushchestvima li rossiyskaya modernizatsiya? [Does Russian modernization feasible?]. Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii [Journal of the new economic association], 1, 143–146.
Polovinkin, V. N. & Fomichev, A. B. (2014). Problemy importozameshcheniya v otechestvennoy ekonomike [Substitution problems in the domestic economy]. Ekspertnyy soyuz [Expert alliance], 12, 30–33.
Kondratyev, N. D. & Oparin, D. I. (1928). Bolshie tsikly konyunktury. Doklady i ikh obsuzhdenie v Institute ekonomiki. 1-e izd. [Great cycles of the conjuncture: reports and discussion at the institute of economics. 1st ed.]. Moscow, 287.
Glazyev, S. Yu. & Kharitonova, V. V. (Eds). Nanotekhnologii kak klyuchevoy faktor novogo tekhnologicheskogo uklada v ekonomike [Nanotechnology as a key factor in the new technological paradigm in economy]. Moscow: Trovant Publ., 246.
Mackun, P. Silicon Valley and Route 128: Two Faces of the American Technopolis. Retrieved from: http://www.netvalley.com/silicon_valley/Silicon_Valley_and_Route_128.html (date of access: 20.02.2016).
Masser, J. (1991). Technology and regional development policy: A review of Japans Technopolis Programm. Regional Stadies. Cambrige, 24(1), 42–53.
Danilov-Danilyan, A. (2015, February 24). Importozameshchenie v Rossii-2015. Chem obernetsya krizisnaya politika dlya kompaniy [Import substitution in Russia-2015: the crisis will result in policy for companies]. Kommercheskiy director [Commercial director]. Retrieved from: http://www.kom-dir.ru/article/309-importozameshchenie-v-rossii-2015 (date of access: 15.02.2016).
Romanova, O. A. (2012). Neoindustrializatsiya kak faktor povysheniya ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti staropromyshlennykh regionov [Neo-industrialization as a factor in increasing the economic security of the old industrial regions]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 2, 70–80.
Golova, I. M. (2013). Metodologicheskie problemy obosnovaniya regionalnykh prioritetov innovatsionnogo razvitiya [Methodological problems of justifing the regional priorities of innovation development]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 2, 145–156.
Golova, I. M. & Suhovey, A. F. (2015). Innovation and Technological Development of Industrial Regions under Social and Economic Insecurity. R-Economy, 1, 98–108.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 A.F. Sukhovey, I.M. Golova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

