Innovative Entrepreneurship: A Source of Economic Growth in the Region
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2016-3-24Keywords:
innovative entrepreneurship, regional economic growth, hidden champions, growth engines, study of entrepreneurs, assessment methodology, groups of entrepreneurs, model for ratio of the companies, types of regions, company development strategiesAbstract
This article presents the findings of the study on the role of innovative entrepreneurship in the regional economy. The analysis is based on the methodology developed by Hermann Simon, a German scientist who has coined the term ''hidden champions” describing the phenomenon of little-known successful companies that act as innovative growth engines in the German economy. Today, the economies in different countries are developing amid the ”new normal,” in which no expected recovery followed the global crisis of2008. This makes it necessary to rethink the role of entrepreneurship during a prolonged recession. The authors proposed and tested the hypothesis that, in this environment, the economic growth in the country and the region is increasingly determined not so much by large businesses, but by many small innovative companies. To identify Russian ”hidden champions,” we studied more than 1247 companies listed in the Innovation and Investment Market, a specialized section of the Moscow Exchange, and included in the specialized Register of Business Entities that use nanotechnology. We identified specifically Russian features of innovative entrepreneurship related to national cultural and historical characteristics and the current policy of import substitution. The authors proposed their own method for assessing the innovative entrepreneurship as a source of economic growth in the Russian regions that defines five groups of innovative entrepreneurs (global market leader, one of the global market leaders, Russian market leader, one of the Russian market leaders, not the leader in the Russian market) and compares them with large companies in terms of turnover and profit dynamics. Based on such criteria as ''number of ''hidden champions” and ''number of large enterprises per 100 thousand organizations,” we built a model for the ratio of ''hidden champions” to major companies in the Russian regions that identifies, for each criterion, three subgroups, including leaders, medium-tier and outsiders, which allowed to identify nine types of Russian regions and substantiate different development strategies for main types of regions. The study confirms that the most justified strategy for the development of innovative entrepreneurship in the region is the strategy of cooperation between different types of companies in order to overcome their weaknesses, enhance existing opportunities and activate the innovation and entrepreneurial capacity.References
Nekipelov A. D. (2013). K voprosu ob ekonomicheskom roste i ekonomicheskom razvitii . Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii , 4, 10-12.
Mikheev V. V. & Lukonin S. A. (2015). Kitay posle Boao-2015 . Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya , 8, 61-70.
Tatarkin A. I. & Romanova O. A. & Akberdina V. V. (2014). Formirovanie vysokotehnologichnogo sektora v industrialnom regione . Zhurnal novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii , 2(22), 195-200.
Vlasova N. Yu. & Jack L. N. (2009). Perspektivy razvitiya mezhmunitsipalnogo sotrudnichestva v subyektakh RF . Voprosy upravleniya , 8, 85-88.
Kuklin A. A., Bagaryakov A. V. & Nikulina N. L. (2012). Faktory i indikatory innovatsionnogo razvitiya regiona . Vestnik Zabaykalskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta , 10, 116-121.
Ruzhanskaya L. S. (2010). Gosudarstvo i izmenenie strategicheskikh aspektov korporativnogo upravleniya v rossiyskikh kompaniyakh . Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: sotsialno-ekonomicheskie nauki , 1(10), 3-16.
Sukhovey A. F. & Golova, I. M. (2015). Prioritety sovremennogo innovatsionnogo razvitiya za rubezhom i v regionakh Rossii . Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii , 2, 43-52.
Tatarkin A. I. (2013). Innovatsionnyye istochniki prostranstvennogo razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii . Innovatsii , 3(173), 10-17.
Frolov A. S. (2014). Problemy planirovaniya nauchno-tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya na gosudarstvennom urovne . Problemy prognozirovaniya , 6(147), 79-91.
Myslyakova J. V. (2008). Institutsionalizatsiya sotsialnoy otvetstvennosti biznesa: evolyutsionnyy aspekt . Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii , 3, 45-57.
Mezentseva E. S. (2014). Otsenka dinamiki i infrastruktury razvitiya malogo proizvodstvennogo predprinimatelstva v regionakh UrFO . Ekonomika i predprinimatelstvo , 11(52), 250-255.
Voronina L. V., Shelomensev A. G. & Isaeva E. D. (2014). Sravnitelnyye otsenki programm razvitiya i podderzhki predprinimatelstva v severnykh regionakh Rossii . Ekonomika i predprinimatelstvo , 8(49), 894-900.
Akberdina V. V. (2014). Optimizatsiya usloviy innovatsionnogo razvitiya dlya raznykh tipov regionov . Vestnik Uralskogo instituta ekonomiki, upravleniya i prava , 3(28), 28-33.
Pilyasov A. N. (2015). Problems of Regional Development in Economic Geographers Papers. Socio-Economic Geography in Russia. Vladivostok: Dalnauka Publ, 310 (94-102).
Diamandis P. H. & Kotler S. (2012). Abundance: The Future Is Better Than You Think. New York: Free Press, 386.
Brynjolfsson E. & McAfee A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 306.
Bostrom N. & Anissimov M. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. UK: Oxford University Press, 352.
Thiel P. A. (2014). Zero to One: Notes on Startups, or How to Build the Future. Peter Thiel with Blake Masters. New York: Crown Business, 210.
Vance A. (2015). Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future. Virgin Books.
Simon H. (2009). Hidden Champions of the 21st Century, Success Strategies of Unknown World Market Leaders. New York, 402 p.
Tatarkin A., Andreeva E. & Ratner A. (2015). Instrumenty importozameshcheniya: perspektivy rossiyskikh regionov . Problemy teorii ipraktiki upravleniya , 6, 45-53.
Grinberg R. C. (2015). Rossiyskiy put vykhoda iz krizisa: samobytnost protiv universalnogo trenda . Zhurnal novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii , 2, 190-195.
Andreeva E. L., Golovina A. N., Glukhikh P. L. & Aleksina A. S. (2015). Instituty razvitiya predprinimatelstva i ikh vzaimodeystvie s regionalnoy innovatsionnoy sistemoy . Ekonomika i predprinimatelstvo , 8-1(61-1), 909-913.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 E.L. Andreeva, H. Simon, D.A. Karkh, P.L. Glukhikh

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

