Regional Industrial Specialization as a Driver of Russia’s Industrial Sovereignty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2025-4-3Keywords:
economic complexity of regional specialization, sectoral economic complexity, high-tech activities, industrial regions, specialization diversity, technological connectivity of industriesAbstract
Macroeconomic turbulence has created the need to strengthen Russia’s industrial sovereignty by developing high-tech sectors and enhancing the complementarity between production and innovation. Given the heterogeneity of Russia’s economic space, achieving this goal requires a strategic redistribution of functions across territories, taking into account variations in industrial competencies and sectoral structures. This article develops analytical tools to assess the economic complexity of industrial structures and individual types of activity in industrial regions, aiming to optimize the portfolio of strategic specializations and identify promising areas for development to support Russia’s industrial sovereignty. The study focuses on 22 regions, covering 71 manufacturing industries of high and medium-high technology levels. The research methodology involves evaluating indicators of economic complexity, including comparative advantages of specialization, diversity, prevalence, technological connectivity, density, and inter-industry distance. The analysis draws on employment and shipped-product data for 2023–2024 from the EMISS and FIRA PRO information systems. The analysis mapped regional industrial structures, identified regions with complex industry profiles, clarified key strategic specializations, and highlighted promising industries with potential for technological and production growth. The analysis examined how the specialization structures of Yaroslavl and Kaluga regions align with their broader industrial systems, helping to identify promising types of economic activity and potential areas for policy support. The findings provide a foundation for defining industrial policy priorities, strengthening regional production and technological capacities, and advancing Russia’s industrial sovereignty.
References
Abrosimova, O. M., & Moreva, E. L. (2024). Developing a state-led approach to technological self-reliance in China’s industry. Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sociologii [The Review of Economy, the Law and Sociology], (3), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.24412/1998–5533-2024-3-8-12 (In Russ.)
Afanas’ev, M. Yu., & Gusev, A. A. (2023). About assessing the economic complexity of the regions. Cifrovaya ekonomika [Digital Economy], (1(22)), 5–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.34706/DE-2023-01-01 (In Russ.)
Akberdina, V. V., & Romanova, O. A. (red.) (2018). Mul’tisub’ktnaya promyshlennaya politika: kol. monogr. [Multisubject Industrial Policy]. Ekaterinburg: Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS, 365. (In Russ.)
Coe, N. M., Hess, M., Yeung, H. W., Dicken, P., & Henderson, J. (2004). “Globalizing” Regional Development: A Global Production Networks Perspective. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29 (4), 468–484.
Edler, J., Blind, K., Frietsch, R., Kimpeler, S., Kroll, H., Lerch, C., ... & Walz, R. (2020). Technology Sovereignty: from demand to concept (No. 02/2020). Perspectives-Policy Brief. https://doi.org/10.24406/publica-fhg-300409
Edler, J., Blind, K., Kroll, H., & Schubert, T. (2021). Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy: Defining rationales, ends and means, Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis (No. 70). FraunhoferInstitut für System – und Innovationsforschung ISI, Karlsruhe. https://doi.org/10.24406/publica-fhg-301112
Fiott, D. (Ed.) (2021). European sovereignty. Strategy and interdependence Chaillot paper, 49.
Golova, I. M. (2022). Scientific and technical capacity of regions as the foundation for technological independence of the Russian Federation. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of regions], 18 (4), 1062–1074. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-4-7 (In Russ.)
Gómez Zaldívar, F., Molina, E., Flores, M., & Gómez Zaldívar, M. de J. (2019). Complejidad económica de las Zonas Económicas Especiales en México: oportunidades de diversificación y sofisticación industrial. Ensayos Revista De Economía, 38 (1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.29105/ensayos38.1-1
Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C. A., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., Chung, S., Jimenez, J., Simoes, A., & Yıldırım, M. A. (2011). The Atlas of Economic Complexity: Mapping Paths to Prosperity. http://www.tinyurl.com/23knslay (Date of access: 29.05.2025).
Hidalgo, C. A., & Hausmann, R. (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106 (26), 10570–10575. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900943106
Kozonogova, E. V., & Tsekhmister, N. A. (2022). Methodology for determining the strategy of regional development based on the “path dependence” concept. Izvestiya DVFU. Ekonomika i upravlenie [The Bulletin of the Far Eastern Federal University. Economics and Management], 104 (4), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.24866/2311–2271/2022-4/28-46 (In Russ.)
Kroll, H. (2024). Policies for industrial development, international collaboration and technological sovereignty: Implications for emerging economies (No. 85). Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers-Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis. https://doi.org/10.24406/w-34872
Krupnov, Y. A., & Silvestrov, S. N. (2024). Technological sovereignty and diffusion of technologies. Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk [The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences], (2), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.52180/2073–6487_2024_2_31_48 (In Russ.)
Kumar, S. (2023). Development Strategy for Future India and Atmanirbhar Bharat: A Way Forward. Sovremennaya mirovaya ekonomika [Contemporary World Economy Journal], 1 (4(4)). (In Russ.)
Lee, J. D., Lee, K., Radosevic, S., & Vonortas, N. (2021). The challenges of technology and economic catch-up in emerging economies. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192896049.001.0001
Leonard, M., Pisani-Ferry, J., Ribakova, E., Shapiro, J., & Wolff, G. (2019). Redefining Europe’s economic sovereignty. Policy Contribution, (9). https://www.bruegel.org/system/files/wp_attachments/PC-09_2019_final-1.pdf (Date of access: 29.05.2025).
March, C., & Schieferdecker, I. (2021) Technological Sovereignty as Ability, Not Autarky. CESifo Working Paper (No. 9139). Munich: Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute (CESifo).
OECD (2024). OECD Roundtables on Competition Policy Papers. https://doi.org/10.1787/20758677
Otto, A., Losacker, S., & Hansmeier, H. (2025). Relatedness, complexity, and regional development paths in Germany: a sequencing approach. The Annals of Regional Science, 74 (2), 50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-025-01375-5
Plattform Industrie 4.0. (2019). Shaping Industrie 4.0. Autonomous, interoperable and sustainable. https://www.plattform-i40.de/IP/Redaktion/EN/Downloads/Publikation/2019-progress-report.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=6 (Date of access: 29.05.2025).
Pogorel, G., & Cappelletti, F. (2024). Revisiting the EU Industrial Autonomy Trilemma. Sustainable? Competitive? The EU’s Industrial Autonomy — Facts and Fantasies (pp. 9-15). European Liberal Forum.
Rastvortseva, S. N. (2020). Innovative Path of the Regional Economy’s Departure from the Previous PathDependent Development Trajectory. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 16 (1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.17059/2020-1-3 (In Russ.)
Roos, G., Voloshenko, K. Yu., Drok, T. E., & Farafonova, Yu. Yu. (2020). An economic complexity analysis of the Kaliningrad region: identifying sectoral priorities in the emerging value creation paradigm. Baltiyskiy region [Baltic Region], 12 (1), 156–180. https://doi.org/10.5922/2079–8555-2020-1-9 (In Russ.)
Shinkarenko, P. V. (2019). Estimating the export potential of the constituent entity of the Russian Federation using the Hausmann–Klinger method: Practical results and limitations. Vestnik MIRBIS, (2(18)), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.25634/MIRBIS.2019.2.17 (In Russ.)
Smorodinskaya, N. V., & Katukov, D. D. (2024). Moving towards technological sovereignty: a new global trend and the Russian specifics. Baltiyskiy region [Baltic Region], 16 (3), 108–135. https://doi.org/10.5922/2079–8555-2024-3-6 (In Russ.)
Sorokozherdyev, K. G., & Efimov, E. A. (2023). The Influence of the Regional Sectoral Structure on the Socio-economic Development of a Region. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of regions], 19 (2), 314–328. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-2-2 (In Russ.)
Tagliapietra, S., & Veugelers, R. (Eds.). (2023). Sparking Europe’s New Industrial Revolution: A Policy for Net Zero, Growth and Resilience. Bruegel.
Voloshenko, K. Y., Drok, T. E., & Farafonov, Y. Y. (2019). The economic complexity at the sub-national level as an innovative paradigm for regional development. Voprosy innovatsionnoy ekonomiki [Russian Journal of Innovation Economics], 9 (3), 735–752. https://doi.org/10.18334/vinec.9.3.40822 (In Russ.)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Правдина Наталья Викторовна , Данилова Ирина Валентиновна , Карпушкина Анжелика Викторовна
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
