Implementation of the Far Eastern Hectare Program: Effect of Incentives to Its Agents
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-4-7Keywords:
theory of property rights, land ownership, theory of privatisation, institutional changes, regional economy, municipality, agents of reforms, incentives, Far Eastern hectare, Russian Far EastAbstract
The article examines large-scale privatisation of land resources in the Russian Far East under the Far Eastern hectare program. This program transforms the institution of property in the region by transferring land to private ownership. The study explores mechanisms for implementing the program, as well as its effects. New institutional economics is applied to explain the differences in the program implementation rates across regions and municipalities and assess the correlation between reform results and incentives and performance of its agents (mostly municipal authorities). We analysed 155 observations of hectares, a survey of 200 participants of the Far Eastern hectare program, more than 20 interviews with developers, agents and program participants, comparative cases of receiving and not receiving land, participation and non-participation in the program, as well as quantitative statistics on 157,016 granted and non-granted applications for land plots submitted before May 31, 2020. The research revealed an uneven distribution of total applications for land, as well as that of rejections, ranging from 18 % to 56 % per region, with even greater disparity across municipalities. Correlation analysis identified key indicators affecting the share of rejection, including economic indicators of municipalities, as well as indicators of local revenue structure. Regression analysis showed that it is more difficult to get a hectare in economically developed regions, and that the share of granted hectares depends on current or potential benefits of their use for municipalities. It was concluded that economic incentives of municipalities contradict the goals of the Far Eastern hectare program, greatly hindering its successful implementation.
References
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation. The American Economic Review, 91 (5), 1369–1401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.5.1369
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2002). Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117 (4), 1231–1294. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302320935025
Anderson, H. L. (2011). That Settles It: The Debate and Consequences of the Homestead Act of 1862. The History Teacher, 45 (1), 117–137.
Berry, S. (1993). No Condition is Permanent: The Social Dynamics of Agrarian Change in Sub-Saharan Africa. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 288.
Berry, S. (1997). Tomatoes, Land and Hearsay: Property and History in Asante in the Time of Structural Adjustment. World Development, 25 (8), 1225-1241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(97)00039-9
Bliakher, L., E., & Bliakher, M. L. (2018). Zomia on the Amur, or State Order Against the Order Outside of State. Politiya [Politeia], 1 (88), 148-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.30570/2078-5089-2018-88-1-148-171 (In Russ.)
de Long, J. B., & Shleifer, A. (1993). Princes and Merchants: European City Growth before the Industrial Revolution. The Journal of Law & Economics, 36 (2), 671–702.
de Soto, H. (1989). The Other Path. New York, New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 271.
Demsetz, H. (1974). Toward a Theory of Property Rights. In: Classic Papers in Natural Resource Economics (pp. 163-177). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Demyanenko, A. (2003). Territorialnaya organizatsiya khozyaystva na Dalnem Vostoke Rossii [Territorial set-up of the economy in the Russian Far East]. Vladivostok, Russia: Dalnauka, 284. (In Russ.)
Dye, A., & La Croix, S. (2013). The Political Economy of Land Privatization in Argentina and Australia, 1810–1850: A Puzzle. The Journal of Economic History, 73 (4), 901–936. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022050713000831
Feoktistova, K. I. (2021). Privatization of «Far Eastern Hectares»: Why (Not) Develop? Regionalistika [Regionalistics], 8 (3), 32–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.14530/reg.2021.3.32 (In Russ.)
Libecap, G. (1986). Property rights in economic history: Implications for research. Explorations in Economic History, 23 (3), 227-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4983(86)90004-5
Lipsey, R., & Lancaster, K. (1956). The General Theory of Second Best. The Review of Economic Studies, 24 (1), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296233
Mensрchikov, A. (1911). Materialy po obsledovaniyu krestyanskikh khozyaystv Primorskoy oblasti. T. II. Starozhily-stodesyatniki: Tablitsy[Materials on the survey of peasant farms in the Primorsky Region. T. I Old-timers-centennials: Tables]. Saratov: Tip. Gub. Pravleniya. (In Russ.)
Murtazashvili, I. (2013). The Political Economy of the American Frontier (Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139094092
North, D. (1989). Institutions and economic growth: An historical introduction. World Development, 17 (9), 1319-1332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(89)90075-2
North, D. (1994). Economic Performance Through Time. The American Economic Review, 84 (3), 359–368.
North, D. C., & Thomas, R. P. (1973). The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819438
North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., & Weingast, B. R. (2013). Violence and Social Orders. A conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History [Nasilie i sotsialnye poryadki. Kontseptualnye ramki dlya interpretatsii pismennoy istorii chelovechestva]. Trans. from English. Moscow, Russia: Gaidar Institute Publishing House, 480. (In Russ.)
Olsson, O., & Hansson, G. (2011). Country size and the rule of law: Resuscitating Montesquieu. European Economic Review, 55 (5), 613-629.
Peluso, N. L. (1992). Rich Forests, Poor People: Resource Control and Resistance in Java. Berkeley: University of California Press, 321.
Rubinskiy, V. (1911). Opyty ucheta kolonizatsionnoy emkosti Primorskoy oblasti [Experiments of accounting of colonization capacity of the Primorsky region]. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of V. F. Kirschbaum. (In Russ.)
Ryzhova, N. (2014). Land and power: differences in approaches to property research (the case of informal land use of Chinese farmers). Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 17 (5), 7–35. (In Russ.)
Ryzhova, N. P., & Zhuravskaya, T. N. (2020). The idea of private property and “real” captures of land. Oykumena. Regionovedcheskie issledovaniya [Ojkumena. Regional researches], 1, 31–40. https://doi.org/10.24866/1998-6785/2020-1/31-40 (In Russ.)
Ryzhova, N. P., Guzej, Ya. S., & Karbainov, N. I. (2019). Property right over land: seizures, “recourse abundance” and features of enforcement in the Russian Far East. Oikumena. Regionovedcheskie issledovaniya [Ojkumena. Regional researches], 1, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.24866/1998-6785/2019-1/114-122 (In Russ.)
Stark, D. (1996). Recombinant Property in East European Capitalism. American Journal of Sociology, 101 (4), 993–1027.
Verdery, K. (1996). What was Socialism, and What Comes Next? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 312.
Verdery, K. (2003). The vanishing hectare: Property and value in postsocialist Transylvania. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Verdery, K., & Humphrey, C. (Eds.) (2004). Property in question: Value transformation in the global economy. Oxford: Berg, 320.
Zhuravskaia, T. N., & Feoktistova, K. I. (2019). The Program ‘Far Eastern Hectar’: Institutional Approach. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika [Spatial Economics], 15 (2), 92–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2019.2.092-109 (In Russ.)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Феоктистова Ксения Игоревна , Журавская Татьяна Николаевна
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
