Symmetrical Approaches for the Non-Survey Regionalization Techniques: Ameliorating the Flegg’s Location Quotients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2025-4-18Keywords:
Regional input-output analysis, non-survey techniques, logarithmic Flegg’s location quotients, KFLQ variation, West Greece region, employmentAbstract
In most countries, policy planners face a lack of published primary regional and local input-output (I-O) data for analysing productive networks, which has led researchers to develop various non-survey techniques for the secondary estimation of regional and local intersectoral direct requirements coefficients, serving as the basis for calculating sectoral multipliers. This study seeks to improve non-survey regionalization techniques to better capture regional and local sectoral specializations and to produce more accurate sectoral multipliers for subnational development planning. The hypothesis is that a symmetrical and unrestricted use of the simple location quotient (SLQ), as part of the adjusted Flegg’s location quotient (aFLQ), such as the proposed KFLQ variation, can provide a more reliable database for modelling regional development. Under this approach, regional and local coefficients are allowed to surpass national averages. For the empirical analysis, the productive network of the West Greece region was simulated. Weighted and non-weighted type I backward sectoral employment multipliers were estimated to illustrate the differences resulting from the application of various regionalization techniques. The hypothesis was tested using the assumption that the parameter δ should be set so that KFLQ approaches 1 when the regional-to-national size of a sector approaches its average national allocation across regions. For SLQ, this occurs for each sectoral indicator at approximately 1.5. This assumption resolves the problem of the previously arbitrary definition of the exponent δ.
References
Azorín, J. D. B., Alpañez, R. M., & Del Mar Sánchez De La Vega, M. (2022). A new proposal to model regional input–output structures using location quotients. An application to Korean and Spanish regions. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 101 (5), 1219–1238. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12692
Bonfiglio, A. (2009). On the parametrization of techniques for representing regional economic structures. Economic Systems Research, 21 (2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535310902995727
Czamanski, S. (1969). Applicability and limitations in the use of national input-output tables for regional studies. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 23 (1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01941873
Flegg, A. T., & Tohmo, T. (2013a). Regional input-output tables and the FLQ formula: A case study of Finland. Regional Studies, 47 (5), 703–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.592138
Flegg, A. T., & Tohmo, T. (2013b). A comment on Tobias Kronenberg’s “Construction of regional input-output tables using non-survey methods: The role of cross-hauling”. International Regional Science Review, 36 (2), 235–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017612446371
Flegg, A. T., & Tohmo, T. (2016). Estimating regional input coefficients and multipliers: The use of FLQ is not a gamble. Regional Studies, 50 (2), 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.901499
Flegg, A. T., & Tohmo, T. (2019). The regionalization of input-output tables: A study of South Korean regions. Papers in Regional Science, 98 (2), 601–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12364
Flegg, A. T., & Webber, C. D. (1997). On the appropriate use of location quotients in generating regional input–output tables: Reply. Regional Studies, 31 (8), 795–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/713693401
Flegg, A. T., & Webber, C. D. (2000). Regional size, regional specialization and the FLQ formula. Regional Studies, 34 (6), 563–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400050085675
Flegg, A. T., Lamonica, G. R., Chelli, F. M., Recchioni, M. C., & Tohmo, T. (2021). A new approach to modelling the input–output structure of regional economies using non-survey methods. Journal of Economic Structures, 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-021-00242-8
Flegg, A. T., Mastronardi, L. J., & Romero, C. A. (2016). Evaluating the FLQ and AFLQ formulae for estimating regional input coefficients: empirical evidence for the province of Córdoba, Argentina. Economic Systems Research, 28 (1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2015.1103703
Flegg, A. T., Webber, C. D., & Elliott, M. V. (1995). On the appropriate use of location quotients in generating regional input-output tables. Regional Studies, 29 (6), 547–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409512331349173
Fujimoto, T. (2019). Appropriate assumption of cross-hauling national input-output table regionalization. Spatial Economic Analysis, 14 (1), 106–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2018.1506151
Haggett, P. (1965[2008]). Locational analysis in human geography. In P. Hubbard, R. Kitchin and V. Gill (Eds.), Key Texts in Human Geography (ch.3). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446213742.n3
Isard, W., & Kuenne, R. E. (1953). The Impact of Steel Upon the Greater New York-Philadelphia Industrial Region. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 35 (4), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924389
Kolokontes, A. D. (2021). Reposition of forward-to-backward input-output analysis. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 68 (2), 195–232. https://doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2021–0015
Kolokontes, A. D., Kontogeorgos, A., Loizou, E., & Chatzitheodoridis, F. (2020). Decomposition analysis for the comparison and the comprehension of conventional input-output impacts’ indicators: An empirical paradigm. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 67 (2), 193–217. https://doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2020–0011
Kowalewski, J. (2015). Regionalization of national input-output tables: Empirical evidence on the use of the FLQ formula. Regional Studies, 49 (2), 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.766318
Kronenberg, T. (2009). Construction of regional input-output tables using nonsurvey methods: The role of cross-hauling. International Regional Science Review, 32 (1), 40–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017608322555
Lamonica, G. R., & Chelli, F. M. (2018). The performance of non-survey techniques for constructing sub-territorial input-output tables. Papers in Regional Science, 97 (4), 1169–1203. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12297
Lehtonen, O., & Tykkyläinen, M. (2014). Estimating regional input coefficients and multipliers: Is the choice of a non-survey technique a gamble?. Regional Studies, 48 (2), 382–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.657619
Leven, C. L. (1964). Regional and interregional accounts in perspective. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 13 (1), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01942565
Mccann, P., & Dewhurst, J. H. L. (1998). Regional size, industrial location and input-output expenditure coefficients. Regional Studies, 32 (5), 435–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409850116835
Miller, R. E. (1957). The impact of the aluminum industry on the Pacific Northwest: A regional input-output analysis. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39 (2), 200–209. https://doi.org/10.2307/1928537
Moore, F. T., & Petersen, J. W. (1955). Regional analysis: An interindustry model of Utah. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 37 (4), 368–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925851
Romero, C. A., Mastronardi, L. J., Tarelli, J. P., & Haslop, F. (2019). The regional impact of tourism when data is scarce: An application to the province of Salta. Tourism Planning and Development, 17 (4), 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2019.1673808
Round, J. I. (1978). An interregional input-output approach to the evaluation of nonsurvey methods. Journal of Regional Science, 18 (2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9787.1978.tb00540.x
Tiebout, C. M. (1967). Input-output and the firm: A technique for using national and regional tables. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 49 (2), 260–262. https://doi.org/10.2307/1928233
Tohmo, T. (2004). New developments in the use of location quotients to estimate regional input-output coefficients and multipliers. Regional Studies, 38 (1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400310001632262
Zhao, X., & Choi, S-G. (2015). On the regionalization of input-output tables with an industry-specific location quotient. The Annals of Regional Science, 54 (3), 901–926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-015-0693-x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Колоконтес Аргириос Д.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

