Spatial Scientometrics in Measuring the Geography of Knowledge and Innovation: The Case of India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2025-2-19Keywords:
spatial scientometrics, spatial bibliometrics, geography of knowledge, geography of innovation, regional innovation system, patent analysis, innovation, IndiaAbstract
The global landscape of science, technology, and innovation (STI) is increasingly shifting toward developing countries. China and India—two Asian economies with fast-growing innovation sectors—are at the forefront of this process, yet the regional dimension of their knowledge economies, especially in India, remains insufficiently studied. This article examines territorial and sectoral patterns of knowledge production and commercialization across Indian states, applying a spatial scientometric approach. The analysis draws on data from Scopus, Intellectual Property India, and the National Manufacturing Innovation Survey (2017–2022), aligned with India’s national development priorities. The study explores how regional scientific output relates to inventive and innovation activity. The results show a strong positive link between scientific productivity and both patenting and innovation, with a particularly strong connection between regional knowledge production and inventive activity. The strength of this link varies by field: the spatial distribution of patents closely aligns with publication centres in natural sciences, life sciences, and medicine, but shows the weakest association with arts and humanities. Innovation indicators—such as India’s Industrial Innovation Index and the number of innovative firms—are most strongly linked to output in life sciences and medicine as well as social sciences and management. These findings underscore the potential of scientometric indicators to complement traditional measures of innovation, particularly in data-scarce regional contexts. They offer empirical support for integrating bibliometric data into regional STI assessments and for forecasting innovation potential at the subnational level.
.
References
Acosta, M., Coronado, D., Ferrándiz, E., & León, M. D. (2010). Factors affecting inter-regional academic scientific collaboration within Europe: The role of economic distance. Scientometrics, 87(1), 63–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0305-6
Aoyama, Y., & Parthasarathy, B. (2012). Research and development facilities of multinational enterprises in India. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 53(6), 713730. https://doi.org/10.2747/1539–7216.53.6.713
Arana Barbier, P. J. (2023). The Relationship Between Scientific Production and Economic Growth Through R&D Investment: A Bibliometric Approach. Journal of Scientometric Research, 12(3), 596–602. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.12.3.057
Badran, A., & Badran, S. (2022). Ups and Downs of Science and Technology Indicators in Arab Countries. In A. Badran, E. Baydoun, J. R. Hillman (Eds.), Higher Education in the Arab World: Research and Development. Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80122-9_6
Bhardwaj, M., Sandhu, A., & Ghumman, N. (2021). Patents Commercialization Profile of Universities and Higher Education Institutes in India. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26(4), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.56042/jipr.v26i4.49278
Bielecka, E., & Burek, E. (2019). Spatial data quality and uncertainty publication patterns and trends by bibliometric analysis. Open Geosciences, 11(1), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2019–0018
Bonitz, M. (2001). About the Nalimov Memorial Issue of the Journal Scientometrics. Scientometrics, 52(2), 107–109. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017986917073
Bornmann, L., & de Moya-Anegón, F. (2019). Spatial bibliometrics on the city level. Journal of Information Science, 45(3), 416–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551518806119
Bornmann, L., & Waltman, L. (2011). The detection of “hot regions” in the geography of science — A visualization approach by using density maps. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 547–553.
Bornmann, L., Leydesdorff, L., Walch-Solimena, C., & Ettl, C. (2011). Mapping excellence in the geography of science: An approach based on Scopus data. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 537–546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.05.005
Brooks, H. (1994). The relationship between science and technology. Research Policy, 23(5), 477–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048–7333(94)01001-3
Chakrabarti, K., & Mondal, D. (2022). India’s Research Collaboration Trend with the Selected African Countries: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Scientometric Research, 10(3), 412–422. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.10.3.59
Csomós, G. (2017). Mapping spatial and temporal changes of global corporate research and development activities by conducting a bibliometric analysis. Quaestiones Geographicae, 36(1), 67–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2017–0005
Csomós, G., & Tóth, G. (2016). Exploring the position of cities in global corporate research and development: A bibliometric analysis by two different geographical approaches. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 516–532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.004
de Queiroz, A. P. (2021). Spatial analysis: A bibliometric approach (1950–2019). Earth Science Informatics, 14(1), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-020-00546-6
De Solla Price, D. (1951). Quantitative measures of the development of science. Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Sciences, (14), 85–93.
De Solla Price, D. (1965). Networks of Scientific Papers: The pattern of bibliographic references indicates the nature of the scientific research front. Science, 149(3683), 510–515.
De Solla Price, D. (1975). Science Since Babylon. (2nd ed.). Yale University Press, New Haven.
Desai, P. N. (2013). Export innovation system: Changing structure of India’s technology-intensive exports. Institutions and Economies, 5(3), 21–51.
Dwivedi, A., & Arora, A. (2020). Economic geography of innovation in India: an empirical investigation. Innovation and Development, 10(3), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2019.1679952
Gao, S. (2015). Towards a frontier of spatial scientometric studies. SIGWEB Newsl., 5, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/2749279.2749284
Garg, K. C. (2019). Whither Scientometrics in India. Journal of Scientometric Research, 7(3), 215–218. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.7.3.34
Godin, B. (2006). On the origins of bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 68(1), 109–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0086-0
Grafield, E. (1964). Science Citation Index — a New Dimension in Indexing. Science, 144, 649–654. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.144.3619.649
Hennemann, S., Wang, T., & Liefner, I. (2011). Measuring regional science networks in China: A comparison of international and domestic bibliographic data sources. Scientometrics, 88(2), 535–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0410-1
Inglesi-Lotz, R., Hakimi, A., & Pouris, A. (2018). Patents vs publications and R&D: three sides of the same coin? Panel Smooth Transition Regression (PSTR) for OECD and BRICS countries. Applied Economics, 50(45), 4912–4923. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018.1468556
Ivanova, N. I., & Mamedyarov, Z. A. (2019). R&D and innovation: Competition is growing. World Economy and International Relations, 63(5), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131–2227-2019-63-5-47-56
Jain, P. & Roy, A. (2024). Catalysts of Innovation: Advancing India’s Future Through Investments in Basic Science. In S. Trivedi, V. Grover, B. Balusamy, A. Ganguly (Eds.), Unleashing the Power of Basic Science in Business (pp. 91–117). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693–5503-9.ch006
Javed, S., Rong, Y., Zafeer, H. M. I., Maqbool, S., & Abbasi, B. N. (2024). Unleashing the potential: a quest to understand and examine the factors enriching research and innovation productivities of South Asian universities. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1147. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03674-2
Jiang, L., Zhu, N., Yang, Z., Xu, S., & Jun, M. (2018). The relationships between distance factors and international collaborative research outcomes: A bibliometric examination. Journal of Informetrics, 12(3), 618-630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.04.004
Jyoti, Banwet, D. K., & Deshmukh, S. G. (2010). Modelling the success factors for national R&D organizations: a case of India. Journal of Modelling in Management, 5(2), 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465661011061005
Kalachikhin, P. A. (2020). Forecasting Basic Research Using Scientometric Data. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 47, 126–132. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688220020100
Khachoo, Q., & Sharma, R. (2017). FDI and incumbent R&D behavior: Evidence from Indian manufacturing sector. Journal of Economic Studies, 44(3), 380–399. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-10-2015–0188
Kopala, M. R., Ashta, A., Mor, S., & Parekh, N. (2023). The Co-Evolution of India’s Policy on Science, Technology, and Innovation with University Education: The Need for Innovation in Higher Educational Institutions. Space and Culture, India, 11(2), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v11i2.1333
Krishna, V. V. (2019). Universities in the national innovation systems: Emerging innovation landscapes in Asia-Pacific. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(3), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5030043
Krishnan, R. T., & Prashantham, S. (2018). Innovation in and from India: The who, where, what, and when. Global Strategy Journal, 9(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1207
Kumar, A. (2021). Comparing scientific productivity using Scopus and Web of Science (WoS): a case of Indian R&D laboratories. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 29(3), 414–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2020.1816837
Mammen, J. T., & A. K., N. (2024). Evolution of Science Technology and Innovation policies of India: Assessing the role of the domestic and international milieu. Comparative Strategy, 43(2), 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2024.2317253
Matthiessen, C. N. W., & Schwarz, A. W. (1999). Scientific centres in Europe: An analysis of research strength and patterns of specialisation based on bibliometric indicators. Urban Studies, 36(3), 453–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098993475
Mehta, S. (2018). National Innovation System of India: An Empirical Analysis. Millennial Asia, 9(2), 203–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0976399618786343
Mesropyan, V. R., & Ovsyannikov, M. V. (2014). Prospects for the application of scientometric methods for forecasting. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 41(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688214010080
Meyer, M. (2000). Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature. Research Policy, 29(3), 409–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048–7333(99)00040-2
Mikhaylov, A. S., Hvaley, D. V., Singh, P. & Singh, V. K. (2020). Potential of Russian-Indian scientific cooperation (the case of western border regions of Russia). IKBFU’s Vestnik. Series: Humanities and social science, (3), 103–117. (In Russ.)
Mikhaylov, A. S., Kuznetsova, T. Yu., & Peker, I. Yu. (2019). Methods of spatial scientometrics in assessing the heterogeneity of the innovation space of Russia. Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania [Perspectives of science and education], (5), 549–563. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2019.5.39 (In Russ.)
Mikhaylov, A. S., Mikhaylova, A. A., Singh, V. K., & Hvaley, D. V. (2020). Knowledge geography for measuring the divergence in intellectual capital of Russia. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.34190/EJKM.18.02.003
Mondal, D., Chakrabarti, K., Banerjee, S., & Lal, D. D. (2021). Publication output with citation-based performance of selected DBT institutes in India. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 41(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.41.02.16547
Mueller, C. E. (2016). Accurate forecast of countries’ research output by macro-level indicators. Scientometrics, 109(2), 1307–1328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2084-1
Nalimov, V. V. (1966). Quantitative methods of research of scientific evolution. Voprosy Filisofii, (12), 38–47. (In Russ.)
Nalimov, V. V., & Mul’chenko, Z. M. (1969). Naukometriya. Izucheniye razvitiya nauki kak informatsionnogoprotsessa [Naukometriya, the Study of the Development of Science as an Information Process]. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)
Narin, F., & Carpenter, M. P. (1975). National publication and citation comparisons. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 26(2), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630260203
Pan, R. K., Kaski, K., & Fortunato, S. (2012). World citation and collaboration networks: Uncovering the role of geography in science. Scientific Reports, 2, 902.
Pogodina, T. V., Udaltsova, N.L., & Filushina, A. V. (2019). Paradigm shift in technological development of socio-economic system in the context of digital transformation. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 10(2), 653–662.
Popp, D. (2017). From science to technology: The value of knowledge from different energy research institutions. Research Policy, 46(9), 1580–1594, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.07.011
Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349.
Rakshit, S., & Moitra, S. (2024). Innovation and Progress: An Insight into the Indian Business Start- Ups and the Promotion of Scientific Temper for Socio-Economic Advancement. Indian Journal of Law and Justice, 15(1), 377–399.
Régnier, P. (2023). Innovation, Appropriate Technologies and Entrepreneurship for Global Sustainability Development: A Review Until the Early Twenty-first Century. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 32(2_suppl), S12–S26. https://doi.org/10.1177/09713557231201115
Salisbury, L., Tian, Y., & Smith, J. (2021). Showcasing Innovation by Analyzing the Characteristics of Patents Granted to Researchers at a Research University. Science & Technology Libraries, 41(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2021.1939835
Sattiraju, V. K., & Janodia, M. D. (2024). Analysis of science, technology and innovation (STI) policies of India from 1958 to 2020. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 15(6), 1691–1708. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-02-2022–0030
Shapira, P., & Youtie, J. (2006). Measures for knowledge-based economic development: Introducing data mining techniques to economic developers in the state of Georgia and the US South. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(8), 950–965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.05.017
Sharma, C. (2016). R&D, technology transfer and productivity in the Indian pharmaceutical industry. International Journal of Innovation Management, 20(1), 1650010. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919616500109
Sharma, G., & Haldar, S. (2020). India’s S&T indicators 2019-20: what it reveals and what remains hidden. Journal of Scientometric Research, 9(3), 352–355. https://doi.org/10.5530/JSCIRES.9.3.43
Sharma, P., Tripathi, R., Singh, V., & Tripathi, R. C. (2016). Assessing the ICT innovative position of India based on patent data and research publications. Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 6(4), 514–533. https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2016.04.07
Sharma, R., & Jain, A. (2014). Research and patenting in Indian universities and technical institutes: An exploratory study. World Patent Information, 38, 62–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2014.04.002
Shivdas, A., & Ray, S. (2021). Research and development efforts in Indian pharmaceutical industry: How much does it matter? International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing, 15(4), 534–549. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPHM-01-2020–0004
Srinivasaiah, R., Renuka, S. D., & Prasad, U. K. (2021). Impact of DST-FIST Funding on Research Publications in India (2000–2020) — A Bibliometric Investigation. Journal of Scientometric Research, 10(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.10.2.28
Venkata, S. K., I Narayan, A., Chogtu, B., & Janodia, M. (2021). A bibliometric study on the research outcome of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. F1000Research, 10. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.51337.1
Veugelers, R., & Wang, J. (2019). Scientific novelty and technological impact. Research Policy, 48(6), 1362–1372, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.019
Wang, J. J. & Ye, F. Y. (2021). Probing into the interactions between papers and patents of new CRISPR/CAS9 technology: A citation comparison. Journal of Informetrics, 15(4), 101189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101189
Wong, C.-Y., & Wang, L. (2015). Trajectories of science and technology and their co-evolution in BRICS: Insights from publication and patent analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.11.006
Zhou, P., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2009). Regional analysis on Chinese scientific output. Scientometrics, 81(3), 839–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2255-9
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Михайлов Андрей Сергеевич
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
