Import Intensity of the Russian Economy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2024-1-3

Keywords:

отраслевая структура импорта, импортоёмкость производства, импортозамещение, межотраслевой баланс, таблицы использования отечественной и импортной продукции, прямые, косвенные и полные затраты, индекс вертикальной специализации, открытость экономики, отраслевая структура экономики, факторное разложение прироста полной импортоёмкости

Abstract

In the pre-sanction period, foreign economic relations in Russia were growing in importance. While the country’s gross domestic product increased by 1.75 times in 2013 compared to 2000, imports increased by 5.7 times in comparable prices during this period. Despite actual and potential effects of comparative advantages, the growing dependence on foreign markets also had negative consequences. The study assesses the demand for imported goods, considering the existing interindustry relations in the Russian economy. The paper describes the first stage of comparison of direct and total costs for the Russian economy and presents mathematical tools used to calculate indicators of its import dependence. In the future, we are planning to extend this approach to examine the spatial economy of two macrozones, namely, the European and Asian parts of Russia. Statistics show that the direct import intensity of the Russian economy is approximately 6 %, which is less than the global average. The vertical specialisation index of about 11 % indicates a relatively low dependence of the export of domestic goods on imports. In 2014–2020, total import costs reduced the most in the pulp and paper industry (-5 %) and vehicle manufacturing industry (-3 %) mainly due to a decline in their import intensity. In general, the impact of forced import substitution turned out to be negative for most regions after 2013. The proposed methods can be used to forecast the trade balance and consequences of implementing various import substitution policies. Since that intermediate consumption flows are included in indirect and total costs, it is advisable to develop a methodology accounting for investment goods.

Author Biographies

Aleksandr I. Dushenin , Novosibirsk State University

PhD Student, Department of Economics, Novosibirsk State University; Research Assistant, Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of the Siberian Branch of RAS; https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7988-6636; Scopus Author ID: 57226569319 (1, Pirogova St., Novosibirsk, 630090; 17, Ak. Lavrenteva Ave., 630090, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation; e-mail: a.dushenin@g.nsu.ru).

Yuri S. Ershov , Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of the Siberian Branch of RAS

Research Assistant, Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of the Siberian Branch of RAS; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3526-3727; Scopus Author ID: 56556691200 (17, Ak. Lavrenteva Ave., 630090, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation; e-mail: eryus@mail.ru)

Naimdzhon M. Ibragimov , Novosibirsk State University

— Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Vice-Dean of the Department of Economics, Novosibirsk State University; Senior Research Associate, Laboratory of Modeling and Analyzing Economic Processes, Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of the Siberian Branch of RAS; Professor, Novosibirsk State Technical University; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8540-5039; Scopus Author ID: 57202757558; Researcher ID: K-9248-2018 (1, Pirogova St., Novosibirsk, 630090; 17, Ak. Lavrenteva Ave., Novosibirsk, 630090; 20, K. Marksa Ave., Novosibirsk, 630073, Russian Federation; e-mail: naimdjon.ibragimov@nsu.ru).

Published

28.03.2024

How to Cite

Dushenin А. И., Ershov Ю. С., & Ibragimov Н. М. . (2024). Import Intensity of the Russian Economy. Economy of Regions, 20(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2024-1-3

Issue

Section

Regional Economy