2072-64142411-1406

10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-4-3

Rural Digitalisation in the Context of European Approaches and Practices: Scoping Review

Цифровизация сельских территорий в контексте европейских подходов и практик: обзор предметного поля

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4041-6935

Kostyaev

Alexander I.

Костяев

Александр Иванович

galekos@yandex.ru

St. Petersburg Federal Research Center of RASСанкт-Петербургский Федеральный исследовательский центр Российской академии наук

194964984

2023

Alexander I. Kostyaev

Александр Иванович Костяев

CC BY 4.0

https://www.economyofregions.org/ojs/index.php/er/article/view/161

https://www.economyofregions.org/ojs/index.php/er/article/download/161/246

The digital transformation of rural Russia is performed in the context of the lack of complete information on European experience, as the existing reviews only examine certain aspects of this issue. To fill this knowledge gap, the present study identifies the entire set of key concepts and characteristics used in European approaches and practices for the digitalisation of rural areas. The review aims to compile publications of European authors within the subject field. The method of content analysis of relevant publications since the early 1990s until 2022 was utilised. The search was conducted using keywords in the Scopus database and other search engines. The relevance of foreign publications, citations and impact factors of journals were considered during the selection process. The emergence (1990s) of an endogenous approach to rural development and its transformation into a neo-endogenous paradigm determined the mindset and methodology of scientists in this subject field for all subsequent years. The focus on local communities, resources and control in the endogenous approach has been incorporated into the neo-endogenous paradigm. Additionally, knowledge, innovation, networks, social capital and relationships with the external environment became important components of the concept of smart and digital development. Further research is needed to examine socio-economic consequences of rural digitalisation, possibilities of smart and digital development of peripheral areas, the essence of social innovation and digital villages. The review results can be studied in order to apply European approaches and practices for the digitalisation of rural areas in Russia.

Цифровизация сельских территорий в России осуществляется при неполноте информации о европейском опыте. Существующие обзоры по странам ЕС затрагивают лишь отдельные стороны данного вопроса. Для заполнения пробела в знаниях предметным полем обзора определена вся совокупность ключевых концепций и связанных с ними характеристик в рамках европейских подходов и практик, формирующих основу цифровизации сельских территорий. Цель обзора — обобщить публикации европейских авторов в рамках предметного поля и устранить имеющийся пробел. Методы исследования: контент-анализ публикаций за период с начала 1990-х гг. по 2022 г. Поиск велся по ключевым словам в базе данных Scopus и дополнительно в других поисковых системах. Зарубежные публикации отбирались с учетом релевантности, цитируемости и импакт-фактора журналов. Результаты исследования: появление (1990-е гг.) эндогенного подхода к развитию сельских территорий и эволюционная трансформация его в неоэндогенную парадигму определили образ мышления и методологию исследования ученых в данном предметном поле на все последующие годы. Ставку на местные сообщества, местные ресурсы и местный контроль в эндогенном подходе содержит неоэндогенная парадигма. Знания, инновации, сети, социальный капитал и взаимосвязь с внешней средой дополнили сущность последней и перешли в качестве значимых компонентов в концепции умного развития и цифрового развития. Недостаточно разработанными остаются вопросы социально-экономических последствий цифровизации сельских территорий, обоснования возможностей умного и цифрового развития периферийных районов, установления сущности социальных инноваций и «цифровых деревень». Это требует проведения дальнейших исследований. Сделан вывод о необходимости исследования результатов обзора на предмет возможности применения европейских подходов и практик при цифровизации сельских территорий в России.

rural development, district, region, space, paradigm, local communities, social capital, networks, digital transformation, smart village, digital village

сельское развитие, район, регион, пространство, парадигма, местные сообщества, социальный капитал, сети, цифровая трансформация, «умная деревня», «цифровая деревня»

The article has been prepared in accordance with the plan of the St. Petersburg Federal Research Center of RAS FFZF-2022-0018.

Статья выполнена в соответствии с планом НИР ФГБУН СПб ФИЦ РАН FFZF-2022-0018.

Abdrakhmanova, G. I., Bykhovsky, K. B., Veselitskaya, N. N. et al. (2021). Tsifrovaya transformatsiya otrasley: startovye usloviya i prioritety [Digital transformation of industries: starting conditions and priorities]. Moscow: HSE Publishing House, 239. (In Russ.)

Adamowicz, M., & Zwolinska-Ligaj, M. (2020). The “Smart Village” as a Way to Achieve Sustainable Development in Rural Areas of Poland. Sustainability 12 (16), 6503. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166503

Aleksandrov, I. N., & Fedorova, M. Yu. (2019). Impact of the digital economy upon the self-development of rural territories (case of the regions of Russia’s North-Western Federal okrug). Problemy sovremennoy ekonomiki [Problems of Modern Economics], 3 (71), 246-250. (In Russ.)

Belousov, S. A., & Pavlov, A. Y. (2015). Organization of Sustainable Development of Rural Areas on the Basis of the Regional Neo-Endogenous Model. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya [Theory and practice of social development], 19, 50-53. (In Russ.)

Birnbaum, L., Wilhelm, C., Chilla, T. & Kröner, S. (2021). Place attachment and digitalisation in rural regions. Journal of Rural Studies, 87, 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.09.015

Bock, B. (2016). Rural Marginalisation and the Role of Social Innovation; A Turn Towards Nexogenous Development and Rural Reconnection. Sociologia Ruralis, 56 (4), 552–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12119

Bock, B. B. (2012). Social innovation and sustainability; how to disentangle the buzzword and its application in the field of agriculture and rural development. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 114 (2), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.7896/j.1209

Chatzichristos, G., Nagopoulos, N., & Poulimas, M. (2021). Neo-Endogenous Rural Development: A Path Toward Reviving Rural Europe. Rural Sociology, 86 (4), 911–937. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12380

Dargan, L., & Shucksmith, M. (2008). LEADER and innovation. Sociologia Ruralis, 48 (3), 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00463.x

Doyle, A., Hynes, W., & Purcell, S. M. (2021). Building resilient, smart communities in a post-COVID Era: Insights from Ireland. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 10 (2), 18-26. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijepr.20210401.oa2

Ferrari, A., Bacco, M., Gaber, K., Jedlitschka, A., Hess, S., Kaipainen, J., Koltsida, P., Toli, E., & Brunori, G. (2022). Drivers, barriers and impacts of digitalisation in rural areas from the viewpoint of experts. Information and Software Technology, 145 (1), 106816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106816

Foray, D., Eichler, M., & Keller, M. (2021). Smart specialization strategies—insights gained from a unique European policy experiment on innovation and industrial policy design. Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, 2 (1), 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43253-020-00026-z

Galdeano-Gómez, E., Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., & Pérez-Mesa, J. C. (2011). The Complexity of Theories on Rural Development in Europe: An Analysis of the Paradigmatic Case of Almería (South-east Spain). Sociologia Ruralis, 51 (1), 54-78. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00524.x

Gkartzios, M., & Lowe, P. (2019). Revisiting Neo-Endogenous Rural Development. In: M. Scott, N. Gallent, M. Gkartzios (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Rural Planning (pp. 159-169). New York: Routledge. Retrieved from: https://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/250711 (date of access: 02.02.2022).

Gkartzios, M., & Scott, M. (2014). Placing housing in rural development: Exogenous, endogenous and neo-endogenous approaches. Sociologia Ruralis, 54 (3), 241-265. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12030

Guinjoan, Е., Badia, А., & Tulla, A. F. (2016). The New Paradigm of Rural Development. Territorial Con-Siderations and Reconceptualization using the “Rural Web”. Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles, 71, 495–500. https://doi.org/10.21138/bage.2279

Habibipour, A., Lindberg, J., Runardotter, M., Elmistikawy, Y., Ståhlbröst, A., & Chronéer, D. (2021). Rural Living Labs: Inclusive Digital Transformation in the Countryside. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11 (9/10), 59–72.

Haefner, L., & Sternberg, R. (2020). Spatial implications of digitization: State of the field and research agenda. Geography Compass, 14 (12), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12544

Hanninger, L. M., Laxa, J., & Ahrens, D. (2021). A roadmap to becoming a smart village: Experiences from living labs in rural Bavaria. JeDEM — EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 13 (2), 89-109. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v13i2.635

Kaivo-oja, J., Vähäsantanen, S., Karppinen, A., & Haukioja, T. (2017). Smart Specialization Strategy and its Operationalization in the Regional Policy: Case Finland. Research Journal of Business Management, 15 (1), 28-41. https://doi.org/10.3846/bme.2017.362

Kalugina, Z. I. & Fadeev, P. V. (2009). New Paradigm of Rural Development. Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Etnologiya [Universe of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology], 18 (2), 34-49. (In Russ.)

Kasimova, Zh. V., & Kasimov, A. A. (2020). Digital Transformation of Rural Areas. Vestnik NGIEI [Bulletin NGIEI], 8 (111), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.24411/2227-9407-2020-10079 (In Russ.)

Kostyaev, A. I. (2018). To the Question about the Paradigm of Development of Rural Territories. Fundamentalnye i prikladnye issledovaniya kooperativnogo sektora ekonomiki [Fundamental and Applied Researches of the Cooperative Sector of the Economy], 6, 3–12 (In Russ.)

Lee, J., Arneson, A., Nightingale, A. J., & Shucksmith, M. (2005). Networking: Social capital and identities in European rural development. Sociologia Ruralis, 45 (4), 269-283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2005.00305.x

Löfving, L., Kamuf, V., Heleniak, T., Weck, S., & Norlén, G. (2022). Can digitalization be a tool to overcome spatial injustice in sparsely populated regions? The cases of Digital Västerbotten (Sweden) and Smart Country Side (Germany). European Planning Studies, 30 (5), 917–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1928053

Lowe, P., Murdoch, J., & Ward, N. (1995). Beyond endogenous and exogenous models: Networks in rural development. In: J. D. Ploeg, G. Dijk (Eds.), Beyond Modernization: The Impact of Endogenous Rural Development (pp. 87-105). Assen: Van Gorcum, 296.

Lowe, P., Phillipson, J., Proctor, A., & Gkartzios, M. (2019). Expertise in rural development: A conceptual and empirical analysis. World Development, 116, 28-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.12.005

Lowe, P., Ray, C., Ward, N., Wood, D. & Woodward, R. (1998). Participation in rural development: a review of European experience. Centre for Rural Economy, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, England, 90.

Magomedov, A. M. (2020). Digitalization as a Key Factor in the Development of Rural Areas and Agriculture. Sovremennye tekhnologii upravleniya [Modern Management Technology], 2 (92), 4-14. Retrieved from: https://sovman.ru/article/9204/ (Date of access: 25.04.2022) (In Russ.)

Marsden, T., & Sonnino, R. (2008). Rural development and the regional state: Denying multifunctional agriculture in the UK. Journal of Rural Studies, 24 (4), 422–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.04.001

McCann, P., & Ortega-Argiles, R. (2015). Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European Union cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 49 (8), 1291–1302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.799769

Murashova, N. V., & Kovalenko, E. G. (2022). Concept of digital Transformation of Rural Areas. Ekonomika selskogo khozyaystva Rossii [Economics of Agriculture of Russia], 1, 99-103. https://doi.org/10.32651/221-99 (In Russ.)

Murdoch, J. (2000). Networks: A new paradigm for rural development? Journal of Rural Studies, 16 (4), 407-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(00)00022-X

Naldi, L., Nilsson, P., Westlund, H., Wixe, S. (2015). What is smart rural development? Journal of Rural Studies, 40 (8), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.006

Nechiporenko, O. V. & Šljukić, S. (2014). Social Capital of Local Communities in the Development Strategies of Rural Areas: European Experience and the Russian Context. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya [Vestnik Novosibirsk State University. Series: Philosophy], 12 (4), 69-77. (In Russ.)

Neumeier, S. (2012). Why do social innovations in rural development matter and should they be considered more seriously in rural development research? — Proposal for a stronger focus on social innovations in rural development research. Sociologia Ruralis, 52 (1), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00553.x

Nikonova, G. N., Kriulina, E. N. & Tarasenko, N. V. (2016). Factors and Mechanisms to Overcome the Depressive in Rural Development. Vestnik APK Stavropolya [Agricultural Bulletin of Stavropol Region], 2 (22/1), 124-130. (In Russ.)

Nordberg, K., Mariussen, A., & Virkkala, S. (2020). Community-driven social innovation and quadruple helix coordination in rural development. Case study on LEADER group Aktion Österbotten. Journal of Rural Studies, 79, 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.001

Pělucha, M. (2019). Smart Villages and Investments to Public Services and ICT Infrastructure: case of the Czech rural development program 2007–2013. European Countryside, 11 (4), 584–598. https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2019-0032

Philips, R., & Pittman, R. H. (Eds.) (2009). An introduction to community development. New York: Routledge, 446. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203762639

Ploeg, J. D., & Long, A. (Eds.) (2004). Born from Within: Practice and Perspectives of Endogenous Rural Development. Assen, the Netherlands: Van Gorcum, 298.

Ploeg, J. D., & Marsden, T. (Eds.) (2008). Unfolding Webs: The Dynamics of Regional Rural Development. Assen, the Netherlands: Van Gorcum, 262.

Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Tradition in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 258.

Ray, C. (2001). Culture Economies: A Perspective on Local Rural Development in Europe. Centre for Rural Economy. University of Newcastle upon Tyne, 151.

Rijswijk, K., Klerkx, L., Bacco, M., Bartolini, F., Bulten, E., Debruyne, L., Dessein, J., Scotti, I., & Brunori, G. (2021). Digital transformation of agriculture and rural areas: A socio-cyber-physical system framework to support responsibilisation. Journal of Rural Studies, 85, 79-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.05.003

Rolandi, S., Brunori, G., Bacco, M., & Scotti, I. (2021). The Digitalization of Agriculture and Rural Areas: Towards a Taxonomy of the Impacts. Sustainability, 13 (9), 5172. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095172

Salemink, K., Strijker, D., & Bosworth, G. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 54 (8), 360-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001

Semenenko, I. S. (2019). The Rural Local Community in Development Policies in Europe: Discourse and Agency. Yuzhno-rossiyskiy zhurnal sotsialnykh nauk [South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences], 20 (3), 6–27. https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-20-3-6-27 (In Russ.)

Sept, A. (2020). Thinking Together Digitalization and Social Innovation in Rural Areas: An Exploration of Rural Digitalization Projects in Germany. European Countryside, 12 (2), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2020-0011

Shucksmith, M. (2000). Endogenous development, social capital and social inclusion: Perspectives from LEADER in the UK. Sociologia Ruralis, 40 (2), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00143

Shucksmith, M. (2010). Disintegrated Rural Development? Neo-endogenous Rural Development, Planning and Place-Shaping in Diffused Power Contexts. Sociologia Ruralis, 50 (1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00497.x

Slee, B. (1994). Theoretical Aspects of the Study of Endogenous Development. In: J. D. Ploeg, A. Long (Eds.), Born from Within, Practice and Perspectives of Endogenous Rural Development (pp. 184–194). Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.

Slee, B. (2019). Delivering on the Concept of Smart Villages — in Search of an Enabling Theory. European Countryside, 11 (4), 634–650. https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2019-0035

Smart Villages. (2019). Pilot Project. Briefing note, Brussels 21-22 February 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.rndr.ro/documente/smart-villages-briefing-note.pdf (Date of access 25.04.2022)

Sovetova, N. P. (2021). Rural Territories’ Digitalization: From Theory to Practice. Ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz [Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast], 14 (2), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2021.2.74.7 (In Russ.)

Steiner, A. A., & Farmer, J. (2018). Engage, participate, empower: Modelling power transfer in disadvantaged rural communities. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36 (1), 118-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654417701730

Stojanova, S., Lentini, G., Niederer, P., Egger, T., Cvar, N., Kos, A., & Stojmenova Duh, E. (2021). Smart Villages policies: Past, present and future. Sustainability, 13(4), 1663. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13041663

Stovba, E. V. (2020). Digital technologies is as an Innovative Driver of Sustainable Rural Development. APK: Ekonomika, upravlenie [AIC: Economics, Management], 7, 69–78. https://doi.org/10.33305/207-69 (In Russ.)

Szalai, Á., Varró, K., & Fabula, S. (2021). Towards a multiscalar perspective on the prospects of ‘the actually existing smart village’ — a view from Hungary. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 70 (2), 97-112. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.70.2.1

Torre, A., Corsi, S., Steiner, M., Wallet, F., & Westlund, H. (2020). Smart Development for Rural Areas. London: Routledge, 240. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429354670

Trigilia, C. (2001). Social Capital and Local Development. European Journal of Social Theory, 4 (4), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310122225244

Tyurin, G., & Tyurin, V. (2018). Kak podnyat nashu glubinku. Lokalnaya ekonomika v Rossii i v mire [How to raise our hinterland. Local economy in Russia and in the world]. St. Petersburg: Zhivaya provintsiya, 307. (In Russ.)

Vaishar, A., & Šťastná, M. (2019). Smart Village and Sustainability. Southern Moravia Case Study. European Countryside, 11 (4), 651-660. https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2019-0036

Ventura, F., Brunori, G., Milone, P., & Berti, G. (2008). The Rural Web: A Synthesis. In: J. D. Ploeg, Marsden T. (Eds.), Unfolding Webs: The Dynamics of Regional Rural Development (pp. 149-174). Assen: Van Gorcum.

Visvizi, A., Lytras, M., & Mudri, G. (2019). Smart Villages in the EU and Beyond. Emerald Publishing Limited, 208. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787698451

Ward, N., Atterton, J., Kim, T. Y., Lowe, P., Phillipson, J., & Thompson, N. (2005). Universities, the Knowledge Economy and «Neo-Endogenous Rural Development». Discussion Paper Series. Centre for Rural Economy, 15. Retrieved from: https://www.ncl.ac.uk/media/wwwnclacuk/centreforruraleconomy/files/discussion-paper-01.pdf (Date of access: 18.01.2022)

Wiesinger, G. (2007). The importance of social capital in rural development, networking and decision-making in rural areas. Journal of Alpine Research, 95 (4), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.4000/rga.354

Zavratnik, V., Kos, A., & Stojmenova Duh, E. (2018). Smart Villages: Comprehensive Review of Initiatives and Practices. Sustainability, 10 (7), 2559. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072559

Zavratnik, V., Podjed, D., Trilar, J., Hlebec, N., Kos, A., & Stojmenova Duh, E. (2020). Sustainable and Community-Centred Development of Smart Cities and Villages. Sustainability, 12 (10), 3961. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12103961

Zavratnik, V., Superina, A., & Duh, E. S. (2019). Living Labs for rural areas: Contextualization of Living Lab frameworks, concepts and practices. Sustainability, 11 (14), 3797. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143797

Zhogova, Ye. V. (2015). Rural, Urban or Regional Endogenous Development as Basis for Social and Economic Planning. Zhurnal pravovykh i ekonomicheskikh issledovaniy [Journal of Legal and Economic Studies], 2, 157–159. (In Russ.)

Абдрахманова, Г. И., Быховский, К. Б., Веселитская, Н. Н. и др. (2021). Цифровая трансформация отраслей: стартовые условия и приоритеты. Москва: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 239.

Александров, И. Н., Фёдорова, М. Ю. (2019). Влияние цифровой экономики на саморазвитие сельских территорий (на примере регионов Северо-Западного федерального округа России). Проблемы современной экономики, 3 (71), 246–250.

Белоусов, С. А., Павлов, А. Ю. (2015). Организация устойчивого развития сельских территорий на основе применения региональной нео-эндогенной модели. Теория и практика общественного развития, 19, 50-53.

Жогова, Е. В. (2015). Сельское, городское или региональное эндогенное развитие как основа социально-экономического планирования. Журнал правовых и экономических исследований, 2, 157–159.

Калугина, З. И., Фадеева, О. П. (2009). Новая парадигма сельского развития. Мир России. Социология. Этнология, 18 (2), 34–49.

Касимова, Ж. В., Касимов, А. А. (2020). Цифровая трансформация сельских территорий. Вестник НГИЭИ, 8 (111), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.24411/2227-9407-2020-10079

Костяев, А. И. (2018). К вопросу о парадигме развития сельских территорий. Фундаментальные и прикладные исследования кооперативного сектора экономики, 6, 3–12.

Магомедов, А. М. (2020). Цифровизация как ключевой фактор развития сельских территорий и сельского хозяйства. Современные технологии управления, 2 (92), 4–14. URL: https://sovman.ru/article/9204/ (дата обращения 25.04.2022)

Мурашова, Н. В., Коваленко, Е. Г. (2022). Концепция цифровой трансформации сельских территорий. Экономика сельского хозяйства России, 1, 99-103. https://doi.org/10.32651/221-99

Нечипоренко, О. В., Шлюкич, С. (2014). Социальный капитал локальных сообществ в стратегиях развития сельских территорий: европейский опыт и российская специфика. Вестник Новосибирского государственного университета. Сер. Философия, 12 (4), 69–77.

Никонова, Г. Н., Криулина, Е. Н., Тарасенко, Н. В. (2016). Факторы и механизмы преодоления депрессивности в сельском развитии. Вестник АПК Ставрополья, 2 (22/1), 124–130.

Семененко, И. С. (2019). Сельское местное сообщество в фокусе политики развития: научный дискурс и европейские политические реалии. Южно-российский журнал социальных наук, 20 (3), 6–27. https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-20-3-6-27

Советова, Н. П. (2021). Цифровизация сельских территорий: от теории к практике. Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз, 14 (2), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2021.2.74.7

Стовба, Е. В. (2020). Цифровые технологии как инновационный драйвер устойчивого развития сельских территорий. АПК: Экономика, управление, 7, 69–78. https://doi.org/10.33305/207-69

Тюрин, Г., Тюрин, В. (2018). Как поднять нашу глубинку. Локальная экономика в России и в мире. Санкт-Петербург: «Живая провинция», 307.

Birnbaum, L., Wilhelm, C., Chilla, T. & Kröner, S. (2021). Place attachment and digitalisation in rural regions. Journal of Rural Studies, 87, 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.09.015

Dargan, L., & Shucksmith, M. (2008). LEADER and innovation. Sociologia Ruralis, 48 (3), 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00463.x

Foray, D., Eichler, M., & Keller, M. (2021). Smart specialization strategies — insights gained from a unique European policy experiment on innovation and industrial policy design. Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, 2 (1), 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43253-020-00026-z